Week 12 (E) Flashcards
Three types of evaluation
Impact, outcome and process
Impact evaluation
-aims to assess the immediate effects of an intervention and can involve individual or environmental determinants
Individual determinants
-behaviour
-knowledge
-attitudes
-beliefs
-values
-perceptions
-skills
-resources
Environmental determinants
-physical
-behaviour, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, perceptions, skills, and resources of others
-characteristics, norms, practices, regulations, laws, resources, or services present in a grouping of people
Outcome evaluation
aims to asses longer-term intervention effects, including morbidity (disease), mortality (death), or disability
Process evaluation
aims to assess what happened or is happening during implementation of the intervention
Purpose of process evaluation
provide context for the results of the summative evaluation an to help improve the operation and activities of the intervention
Baranowski & Stables list of data that may be collected as part of a process evaluation
- recruitment of participants
-maintenance of participants
-context within which program operates
-resources available to program
-implementation of program
-reach into target group
-barriers to implementing program
-receptivity of target group to program
-initial and continued use of program activities
-exposure of participants to program activities
starting point for evaluation
well written objectives
what will well written objectives tell you
what you need to measure, as well as the benchmarks for a successful intervention
what elements can you add to factors to turn them into objectives
who, what, how much, when
what criteria do good objectives follow
specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time bound
data collection
refers to how health promoters plan to collect or record information concerning the project’s objectives
what data collection methods differ
collection methods for impact and outcome evaluation differ from process evaluation
Impact and outcome evaluation data
quantitative
possible sources of impact and outcome evaluation data
-self completed queationaire
-interviews
-self-completed diaries/logs
-physiological measures
-direct observations
-data already collected
-project records
-clinical exams
Process evaluation data
qualitative
possible sources of process evaluation data
-structured interviews
-focus groups
-observations
-checklists
-attendance records
-self administered evlautation forms
-meeting minutes
-reports
-protocol checklists
-project records
research designs
stragety health promoters use to evalaute their projects
designs differ depending on
whether participants are randomized into experimental and control groups, and when the data are collected
RCT
-the gold standard of quantitative research
-pretest-posttest design (data collecton before and after)
-randomly assigned to experimental or control group
Observation 1 of RCT
allows researcher to assess if the only difference between the two groups is that one group recieved intervention and one group did not
Observation 2 of RCT
allows researcher to infer that differences in the experimental groups observation 2 compared to 1 are due to intervention effects
**also allows for comparisson of control group observation 1 and 2 to verify nothing changed
Experimental Post-Test Design Only
-identical to experimental-no data collected prior to intervention
-relies on randomization to produce two groups that are equal on relevant measures
-differenences between two groups at measure are inferred to be due to intervention