Week 12 - Transnational Dimension Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

What is Tobler’s first law of geography?

A

“Everything is related to everything else, but near things are
more related than distant things.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the conflict trap?

A
  • Conflict begets conflict
  • The same countries tend to be afflicted over and over again
  • Many reasons: economic, social, emotional, etc.
  • Bottom line: Many conflicts today are directly related to
    previous conflict in the same location or between the same
    actors
    → temporal autocorrelation
  • many conflicts are related to neighbouring conflict
    –> spatial autocorrelations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the differences between clustering, diffusion and contagion?

A

Clustering: is desriptive. Conflicts often occur in regional patterns.

Diffusion: is regarding the process of spreading conflict.

Contagion: is regarding the causal mechanism. Conflict may spread through arms flows,
economic shocks, shared identity, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Galton’s Problem?

A

Two possible reasons for clustering of conflict:

  • common shock (e.g. drought )

OR

  • because of interdependence (e.g. conflict diffusion)?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

According to Buhaug & Gleditsch (2005), how can one dea with Galton’s Problem?

A

Need to account/control for
domestic factors
▶ “there is a genuine neighborhood effect of armed conflict,
over and beyond what individual country characteristics can
account for” (p. 215)
▶ degree of exposure to proximate conflicts does not seem to
matter
▶ ethnic ties to groups in neighboring states a mechanism of
CONTAGION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the differences between positive and negative externalities?

A

Positive externalities induce strategic-substitute relations
▶ Kyoto Protocol (≈ public good) → free riding (negative
interdependence)
▶ Free-riding in defensive alliances, e.g. NATO
▶ Collective action dilemma
→ negative interdependence

Negative externalities induce strategic-complements
relations
▶ Arms race (≈ private good) → competition (positive
interdependence)
→ positive interdependence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

According to Metternich & Wucherpfennig, 2020, how do negative and positive interdependences influence civil wars?

A
  • Prevalence: 50% of civil wars involve multiple non-state
    actors.
  • Puzzle: These wars tend to be longer - why?

Positive interdependence - Strategic complements (Why keep fighting?)
* Staying armed preserves ability to:
1 Negotiate
2 Spoil deals
3 Enforce outcomes
4 Protect allies

Negative interdependence - Strategic Substitutes (Why stop fighting?)
* Shared goals are public goods
* Incentivizes free-riding, reducing fighting

Finding: Rebel groups show strategic complementarity, except
in secessionist conflicts where free-riding dominates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the different causal mechanism of diffusion? (These causal mechanisms are pooled under the term contagion)

A

1 Competition
▶ Competition among actors conditions policies and can lead
to “races to the bottom” or “top”.
▶ Empirically, we have to identify who is competing with
whom to make policy predictions.

2 Coercion
▶ In the simplest form, dominant actors and their agents
directly coerce weaker actors to adopt policy changes that
those weaker actors would not otherwise have adopted.
▶ E.g. aid, sanctions, interventions

3 Learning
▶ Adopting policies with beneficial outcomes

4 Emulation
▶ Norms; social knowledge; social construction

5 Transnational Actors
▶ Migration (Franzese and Hays, 2008)
▶ Transnational civil wars (Gleditsch, 2007)
▶ Foreign fighters, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the different factors behind refugee flows?

A
  • Push factors:
    ▶ Violence (against civilians)
    ▶ Persecution
  • Pull factors:
    ▶ Proximate destination
    ▶ Political factors
    ▶ Economic and ecological factors
    ▶ Reliance on existing networks of human smugglers and
    trafficking
    ▶ Existing social networks (ethnic ties, transnational ethnic kin and their proximity)
  • Both can be “weaponized” (Greenhill 2016)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

According to Salehyan & Gleditsch, 2007, and Bohnet et al. 2018, what are the mechanisms behind refugees and onset of civil war?

A

1 Direct fighting
▶ Refugee flows may imply the direct “importation” of
combatants, arms, and ideologies from neighboring states
that facilitate the spread of conflict.
▶ In many cases, refugees are able to set up complex political
structures in exile and can challenge the host government
directly

2 Indirect support
▶ Rather than fighting openly with the host government,
refugee populations can provide resources and support to
domestic opposition groups of a similar ethnicity or political
faction

3 Changing balance of power
▶ Refugee flows can change the ethnic balance in a country,
sparking discontent among local populations toward the
refugees as well as the government that allows access.
▶ Minority groups may feel that the influx of foreigners further
dilutes their strength.
▶ The sudden influx of refugees can aggravate ethnic
problems and further complicate the picture by changing
the domestic balance of power.

4 Refugees as “threat”
▶ Refugees may pose actual or perceived negative economic
externalities.
▶ Immigrants and refugees compete with locals over scarce
resources such as employment, housing, land, and water,
constituting an economic “threat”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are Polo & Wucherpfennig’s (2022) findings in their on Refugee inflows influencing terrorism?

A

Refugee inflows per se do not influence terrorism in the host

  • Limited evidence of “Trojan Horse” effect: OECD countries
    immune from this (overblown concerns)
  • Refugees more likely to become targets of terrorist attacks
    by frightened/hostile locals, especially in rich countries
  • Current debates in media and politics miss a central issue:
    refugees as targets of terrorism
  • Policies/discourses that fuel hostility and fear
    → more terrorism against out-groups in Western
    democracies
    → worse integration → more terrorism
  • Travel bans and immigration restrictions: ineffective against
    fear mechanism and fail to protect immigrants from attacks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is tangible contagion, according to Forsberg 2016, and Chavez & Swed, 2024

A
  • Tangible spillovers-like weapons, refugees, and economic
    shocks-raise the risk of conflict in nearby states.
  • Arms flows: After Gaddafi’s fall in 2011, weapons from
    Libya fueled conflict in Mali.
  • Economic disruption: Civil wars in Liberia and Sierra
    Leone in the 1990s triggered economic instability in
    neighboring Ivory Coast and Guinea.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is intangible contagion?

A
  • Conflict spreads not just through weapons, but through
    ideas and perceptions.
  • Demonstration effects: success in one rebellion inspires
    others elsewhere.
  • Strategic learning: groups learn tactics and mobilization
    strategies from conflicts abroad.
  • Ethnic kinship: cross-border ethnic ties can mobilize
    shared identity and solidarity

Example:
Kosovo - Macedonia (early 2000s)
* Ethnic Albanians in Macedonia were inspired by the
Kosovo Liberation Army’s success in achieving autonomy.
* Led to armed mobilization of Albanian groups in
Macedonia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are “regional conflict complexes” in terms of connectedness of conflicts? according to Gurses, 2015, Forsberg 2016, Gleditsch 2017

A
  • Conflicts often become intertwined through shared actors,
    issues, and cross-border networks.
  • These dynamics form “regional conflict complexes”.
  • Conflicts in such regions reinforce each other and are
    difficult to resolve in isolation.

Example: The Great Lakes region (1990s-2000s)
* Rwandan genocide - influx of Hutu militants into DRC.
* Congolese civil war drew in Rwanda, Uganda, Angola,
Zimbabwe.
* Conflicts became deeply interlinked - “Africa’s First World
War.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the role of external support and War economies in connectedness of conflicts?

A
  • External actors support rebels and governments-militarily
    and financially.
  • War economies emerge, sustained by cross-border trade
    in arms, drugs, and resources.
  • These links incentivize continued fighting and complicate
    peacebuilding.

Example: Liberia and Sierra Leone
* Charles Taylor (Liberia) supported Sierra Leone’s RUF in
exchange for “blood diamonds.”
* Regional arms-for-resources networks made conflict
profitable and self-sustaining.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the implications of contagion an connectedness for peacebuilding?

A
  • More external actors = more stakeholders, more spoilers.
  • Regional dynamics make national peace harder-conflict
    often just moves across borders.
  • Illicit trade and ex-combatants can destabilize neighboring
    countries if not demobilized.

Key Point: Durable peace requires regional solutions-not just
national ones. Peacekeeping and peacebuilding must address regional dynamics, not just national settlements.

Example: Failure of DDR in Sierra Leone and Liberia
* Weapons and ex-fighters crossed borders into Guinea and
Ivory Coast.
* Incomplete reintegration - new violence elsewhere.

17
Q

What are three key transnational mechanism?

A

▶ Clustering: Conflicts often occur in regional patterns.

▶ Contagion: Conflict may spread through arms flows,
economic shocks, shared identity, etc.

▶ Connectedness: Overlapping issues, actors, and war
economies form regional conflict complexes