week 2 - courts + interpreting statutes Flashcards

1
Q

what is case law?

A

law produced by decisions made by judges in higher courts, concerned with development and application of existing principles of laws being applied to cases (sometimes called common law).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why can’t you rely on case law for development of new laws?

A

it would be too slow of a process to rely upon these cases being brought to court. instead, it is up to courts to interpret the meaning of legislation and statutes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is judicial precedent?

A

the principle that judges should follow the decisions of previous cases when deciding similar cases, based on the principle of stare decisis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does stare decisis mean?

A

to stand by decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the advantages of judicial precedent?

A

Consistency + certainty, efficiency + time saving.
Precision + flexibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the disadvantages of judicial precedent?

A

Rigidity, uncertainty (due to overruling by higher courts).
Complexity and number of cases (too many to find relevant precedents), slow development of the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is custom law?

A

minor source of law, cannot be contrary to an act of parliament. local/trade customs must be exercised openly and peacefully without need for further permission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the human rights act 1998?

A

primary legislation designed to align with the European convention of human rights (still effective in uk law post-brexit). All provisions in statutes need to be compatible with the rights set out in the European convention of human rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the different articles from the human rights act 1998?

A

Article 3: freedom from torture.
Article 4: freedom from slavery.
Article 6: right to a fair trial.
Article 9: freedom of thought, conscience and religion.
Article 2 of 1st protocol: right to education.
Article 3 of 1st protocol: right to take part in free elections by secret ballot.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the english court system?

A

system of hierarchy (some are superior to others), no complete separation of criminal and civil courts. If a verdict is appealed, the case may be heard in a higher court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the structure of the english court system?

A

Supreme court
V
Court of appeal
V
High court crown court
V V
County court magistrates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the magistrates court?

A

330 in England and Wales, all criminal cases start in this court. 95% of criminal cases will be completed in these courts as they hear cases of a less serious nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

who hears a case in a magistrates court?

A

Cases are heard by either a district judge or 3 lay magistrates (justice of the peace) who volunteer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is a crown court?

A

77 crown courts in England or Wales, serious crime cases. May hear appeals from the magistrates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

who hears a case in the crown court?

A

high court judges (105 in uk) or circuit judges (600), first time will usually be heard by a judge and jury of 12 ordinary people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what court are indictable offences heard in?

A

crown court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is an indictable offence and what are examples of it?

A

a serious crime that can be tried by a grand jury. this includes criminal offences such as murder, rape, armed robbery etc.

18
Q

what court are summary offence heard in?

A

magistrates court.

19
Q

what is a summary offence and what are examples of it?

A

the least serious criminal offences (all created by a statute), usually punished with a fine or probation. these include driving without insurance, threatening behaviour.

20
Q

what court are offences triable either way heard in?

A

either court.

21
Q

what are offences triable either way and what are examples of them?

A

“mid range” offences that can vary in seriousness depending on the facts. examples of these are burglary, abh, theft.

22
Q

what are county courts?

A

deals with the majority of civil cases.

23
Q

who hears cases in a county court?

A

district judges (max £10k claim) and circuit judges (max £100k claim).

24
Q

what are high courts?

A

deals with civil cases that are larger/more complex than those suitable for county courts, there are 3 divisions to the court.

25
who hears cases at a high court?
high court judges.
26
what are the 3 divisions to high court and what do they mean?
Chancery division = matters relating to finance, mortgages, trusts, company law etc. Queens bench division = contract and tort cases not suitable for county courts, may have cases heard by a jury. Family division = deals with matrimonial and family issues such as divorce.
27
what is the court of appeal?
a court that has separate criminal and civil divisions, hearing appeals from all other courts (county, high and crown). they have 40 justices of appeal.
28
in civil cases, what happens to appeals?
they can only take place with permission of the court the case was heard in or the court to which the appeal is being made. Permission is only given if the appeal has a real prospect of success or there is another compelling reason for it to be heard.
29
what is supreme court?
highest appeal court in England and Wales, cases heard involve points of law of significant importance (either from a public or constitutional perspective). Some cases may go straight to the supreme court from the high court (passing the court of appeal).
30
who hears cases at the supreme court?
12 justices with at least 3 hearing each case.
31
what is a statute?
written laws created by a legislative authority eg act of parliament. They have to be written in a way that ensures they are flexible enough to cover different situations.
32
what are the different ways a judge can interpret what is written in a statute?
the literal rule, the golden rule, the mischief rule, the contextual rule.
33
what is the literal rule?
the words in a statute are examined using their literal meaning. Rules won’t be used if words have more than 1 meaning, if misused it could lead to absurd results.
34
what is the golden rule?
if the literal result causes problematic results, the courts can use the golden rule. The literal meaning of the word can be modified in order to avoid absurdity.
35
what is the mischief rule?
judges examine the common law that existed before to see what was the problem that existed which the common law did not deal with and what remedy the stature was trying to offer.
36
what is the contextual rule?
the meaning of the word is taken from its surrounding text in the statute. Example; footballs, goalposts, corner flags and other equipment would only include other football related equipment.
37
what are the factors judges may consider when interpreting a statute?
The context of the statute: examining surrounding provisions to understand meaning. Legislative history: reviewing debates and reports to understand the intent behind the legislation. Precedent cases: analysing previous court decisions that have interpreted similar. Dictionary definitions: clarifying the meaning of specific words within the statute.
38
whiteley v chappell (1869), the verdict + what rule is used in application?
the literal rule: a statute made it an offence to impersonate “any person entitled to vote” and the defendant impersonated a dead person. Verdict: because dead people were not entitled to vote, the defendant was acquitted.
39
alder v george (1964), the verdict + what rule is used in application?
the golden rule: defendant was charged under the official secrets act 1920 with obstruction “in the vicinity of a prohibited area”, defendant argued that as they were inside the area this was not in the vicinity of it. Verdict: using the golden rule, the statute was interpreted that being “in the vicinity” of the area also meant being inside it.
40
corkery v carpenter (1950), the verdict + what rule was used in application?
the mischief rule: c was charged with “being drunk on the highway in charge of a carriage”, C was riding a bicycle so question was whether a bike could be regarded as a carriage. Verdict: court looked to see what the statute intended and decided that a “carriage” could be interpreted as including a bicycle.