Week 2: Personality Psyc Flashcards

1
Q

the 3 levels of Personality

A

lvls:

1) dispositional traits
2) characteristic Adaptations
3) life narratives

they are hierarchical (3 is the highest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1) Dispositional traits

A
  • broad descriptions of patterns of behavior and experience

-relatively decontextualised
as it arises from v. broad classes of stimuli and situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dispositional traits:

Allport and Odbert (1936)

A

they have a Lexical Hypothesis:
impt chars coded in language.
18k descriptors

Prob: v. unwieldy, a list rather than a system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cattell (1943):
reduced Odbert’s list to Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors (traits)
Precedure

A

1) 18,000 descriptors
2) Sorted into 160 clusters of synonyms/antonyms
3) Discarding near-identical descriptors
4) Final list of 171 descriptors
5) 100 participants rate 1-2 friends on the 171 descriptors
6) Factor Analysis
7) 16 Personality Factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dispositional Traits:
content
strengths
limitations

A

content) Broad, coherent patterns of behaviour and experience
strength) Universal structure, high predictive value
limitation) Lowest resolution description of a person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Problems with Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors

A

1) Subjectivity
2) Poor Replicability / Reproducibility
3) Redundancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Problems with Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors

1) Subjectivity &
2) Poor Replicability / Reproducibility

A

Different people reach a different reduced set of Allport
& Odbert’s descriptors
cannot obtain the same set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Problems with Cattell’s 16 Personality Factors

3) Redundancy

A

Many of his factors correlated too highly for them to really be ‘different’ traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Digman, 1990 created:

The Big Five

A

1) Extraversion
2) agreeableness
3) conscientiousness
4) Neuroticism
5) openness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hierarchical Structure of Traits

A

1) Nuances (very narrow: liking something)
2) Facets (energy lvl. + emotions)
3) Aspects (enthusiasm)
4) Domains (big 5)
5) Meta-traits (stability, plasticity: v. broad)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Big 5 themes are?

3

A

1) Interpersonal responses
2) Responses to achievement settings
3) Emotional responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Interpersonal responses

A

An extraverted person is
— Bold and assertive
— Talkative and sociable

An agreeable person is
— Kind, warmhearted, caring
— Cooperative and trusting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Responses to achievement settings

A

A conscientious person…
— finishing things, doing things properly, being thorough, precise and careful

A neurotic person…
— reflect anxiety,
worry about getting things wrong, messing things up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Emotional responses

A

An extraverted person…
— Experiences positive affect and energy

A more neurotic person…
— Experiences worry and mood swings

An open person…
— Experiences interest and curiosity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Measurements of B5:
Questionnaires:
3 methods used to Estimate Reliability

A

Temporal stability
1) Test-retest reliability
(Correlation between T1 score and T2 score)

Internal consistency
2) Split-half reliability 
(Correlation between scores: half & half)
3) Cronbach's Alpha
(Average of all possible split halves)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Measurements of B5:
Questionnaires:
3 methods used to for validity

A
1) Face validity
(appear valid)
2) Content validity
(relevant content: judge by experts)
3) Criterion-related validity
(sensible correlations with other valid measures)
17
Q

Test-retest reliability:

rationale and caveat

A

R: repeated measure: easy to verify the score

C: not applicable to all psychological phenomena (eg: states: changes more)

18
Q

Cronbach’s Alpha:

A

widely reported measure of reliability

> 0.6 to be considered reliable

19
Q

Criterion-related validity:

1.Concurrent validity

A

Concurrent validity:
2 aspects:
Convergent validity: correlate significantly with related measures?
Divergent validity: weak or zero correlations with unrelated measures

20
Q

Criterion-related validity:

2.Predictive validity

A

predict expected outcomes, or behaviours

21
Q

Caveat of validity of B5

A

Big Five were empirically derived (i.e., without a guiding theory)

Stronger emphasis on predictive validity

but not for the the new BFI-2

22
Q

The scope and limits of traits

A

its not all aspects of personality

Traits are generic descriptors, and relatively decontextualised

personality can be v. contextualised.

23
Q

Characteristic Adaptations’ conceptualizations

A
Both are specific to an individual
McAdams & Pals, 2006:
time - stages of life
place - Specific Situations
Role - Function / Duty

DeYoung, 2015:
stable goals - Desired future states
interpretations - appraised current states
strategies - plans and actions to move between states

24
Q

Life Narratives:
content
strengths
limitations

A

content) Personal Story, unity and purpose of self
strength) Highest resolution description of a person

Limitation) no predictive value

25
To study life narratives using interview focus on:
1) 8 key events in your life 2) Significant people 3) The future script 4) Stresses and problems 5) Personal ideology 6) Life theme
26
when we study life narratives, the focus of content analyses are ______, _________ and ______.
``` Tone (+/-) Themes and (preoccupations w certain prob) Form (stability/change, slow/fast) ```
27
Characteristic Adaptations: content strengths limitations
content) Goals, interpretations, strategies strength) Captures individual circumstances Limitation) Unclear scope and structure