Week 5 Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

The process of quantifying a set of observations of a phenomenon

A

Measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The working definition a researcher uses for a concept

A

Conceptual definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The process of defining the exact way you plan to measure the concept

A

Operationalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Any factor, trait, quality, or condition that can be measured

A

Variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Those defined by their attributes or characteristics. These attributes or characteristics are categorized into two categories: exhaustive and mutually exclusive

A

Nominal level of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The process of assigning a variable measured at the nominal level a numeric value

A

Coding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Those defined by their attributes or characteristics that are categorized into two: exhaustive and mutually exclusive; however, the numeric value assigned to them by the researcher can be logically ranked, but the intervals between categories may not be equal

A

Ordinal level of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Also have to meet the criteria of being exhaustive and mutually exclusive. The numeric value assigned to the categories by the researcher can be logically ranked, which is similar to variables, measured on the ordinal level of measurement. Variables measured on this level, unlike variables measured on the ordinal level, have intervals between the categories that are equal.

A

Interval level of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Have all the characteristics of variables measured at the interval level, in addition to a true zero value. In other words, the zero does mean the absence of a construct or whatever is being measured; zero value has real meaning.

A

Ratio level of measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Occurs when the data collected do not accurately reflects the construct we are attempting to measure.

A

Measurement error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Occurs when there is a pattern to the error

A

Systematic error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Providing the same response to all or most of the items on a measure

A

Response set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The tendency of a person to respond in a positive manner to a question regardless of the question being asked

A

Acquiescent response set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Occurs when the participants respond in a way that conveys a favorable impression of themselves or in a manner they believe will be more consistent with the researchers views

A

Social desirability bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Occurs when one group of study participants is more likely to recall the information requested than other groups of participants

A

Recall bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Occurs when study participants improve or change their behavior simply because they know they’re being studied

A

Hawthorne effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Occurs when there is no consistent pattern of measurement error

A

Random error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

A diminished ability to reject the null hypothesis

A

Bias towards the null

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The degree to which a measure is consistent or dependable

A

Reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Defined as the degree of agreement between the raters

A

Inter-rater reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

The degree of agreement between the observers

A

Inter-observer reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

A statistic that is used to quantify the degree to which two raters or observers are in agreement

A

Cohen’s Kappa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Ranges from zero, which indicates no agreement between the raters, to one, which indicates perfect agreement between the raters

A

Fleiss’ kappa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Assesses the stability or consistency of a measure over time

A

Test-retest reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
A coefficient that can be used to assess the test-retest reliability of two administrations of a measure
Pearson product-moment correlation
26
Used to assess the test-retest reliability, and those situations involving more than two administrations of a measure
Intraclass correlation coefficient
27
Used to determine the consistency of items on a scale
Split-half reliability
28
Achieved when the items on a scale are consistent with each other
Internal consistency
29
Used to assess the degree of internal consistency of the scales items
Cronbach’s alpha
30
The degree to which the measure actually measures what it was designed to measure
Validity
31
Based simply on whether the measure appears to be valid “on its face”
Face validity
32
Assessed by asking experts on the topic to evaluate whether the items on the measure cover the full range of the concept
Content validity
33
Based on how the measure compares to a criterion
Criterion validity
34
Indicates how well the measure corresponds with the criterion that is measured at the same time
Concurrent validity
35
A type of concurrent validity that assesses whether a measure can differentiate between groups known to differ on the variable being measured
Known groups validity
36
Assesses the ability of the measure to predict a criterion that occurs in the future
Predictive validity
37
An assessment of how well the concept of the variable was translated into a measure
Construct validity
38
A measure has__________ when it is correlated with measures that it should be related to, based on theory or empirical evidence
Convergent validity
39
A measure has__________ when it is not correlated with other measures to which it should not be related to
Divergent validity
40
Measures that have established reliability, and validity
Standardized measures
41
Established scores that are used to determine if someone meets or does not meet a specific criterion
Cut-off scores
42
The literal translation of the words
Denotative meaning
43
Captures the weight or intensity of the words
Connotative meaning
44
One person translates from the original language to the second language
One-way translation
45
One person translates from the original language into the second language, and another person, then translates back into the original language
Back translation
46
A process in which the original items are translated. After comparing the original and translated items, the original items may be revised, and then another translation is produced. This process continues until equivalent items are obtained in both languages.
Decentering
47
A measure where the respondents complete the question
Self administered measure/questionnaire
48
A measure where an interviewer reads the questions to the respondents
Interview schedule
49
Questions in which the respondents are asked to provide their own answers to
Open-ended questions
50
Questions in which the respondent is asked to select an option provided by the researcher
Closed-ended questions
51
Usually contain the word no or not, and can reduce the reliability of the measure
Negatively worded items
52
Usually contains more than one issue or topic yet allows for only one response
Double-barreled questions
53
Questions that contain an assumption
Loaded questions
54
Questions that encourage the respondents to respond in a particular way
Biased questions
55
The presentation of items on a survey, where the respondents are asked to write the responses using a specified scale
Likert scale format
56
Items on a scaled survey
Likert items
57
The sum of responses of the Likert items
Likert scale
58
Focuses on establishing equivalence by examining how items function across groups
Measurement equivalence
59
The extent to which a measure is compatible with the language and culture to which it will be adapted
Linguistic equivalence
60
The extent to which the concepts represented by the items making up the measure are understood to have the same meaning across cultural groups
Conceptual equivalence
61
Equivalence in item or question difficulty across groups
Metric equivalence