Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

intro 2 psych > week 7 social cognition > Flashcards

week 7 social cognition Flashcards

1
Q

situationism

A

the view that behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

dispositionism

A

behavior is determined by internal factors eg personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

just world hypothesis

A

people get the outcomes they deserve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

fundamental attribution bias

A

tendency for observers to underestimate impact of situation and overestimate impact of personal disposition when analyzing someone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

acter observer bias

A

misattribute others actions to internal factors and our own behaviors are attributed to situational factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

as the actor how do we perceive our behavior

A

as influenced by the situation (variable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

as the observer how do we perceive our behavior

A

as due to personal dispositions - stable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

cognitive dissonance

A

-psychological discomfort arising from holding two or more inconsistent attitudes, behaviors, or cognitions
- we experience a conflict in our behaviors, attitudes or beliefs that runs counter to our positive self-perceptions, we experience psychological discomfort (dissonance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how to decrease cognitive dissonance

A
  1. changing discrepant behavior eg stop smoking
  2. changing our cognitions through rationalization or denial eg telling ourselves that health risks can be reduced by filtered cigs
  3. adding a new cognition eg smoking stops my appetite so I don’t lose weight which is good for my health
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

hovlands features of persuasion

A

credibility of speaker, physical attractiveness of speaker, subtlety and attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are 2 main routes that play a role in persuasion

A

central and peripheral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is central route of persuasion

A
  • logic driven & uses data & facts
  • argument must be strong to create attitude change
  • works best if audience is analytical and willing to engage in processing of info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the peripheral route of persuasion

A
  • indirect route using peripheral cues to associate positivity with the message
  • relies on association with positive characteristics eg positive emotions & celebrity endorsement
  • doesn’t require much effort in info processing
  • less permanent attitude change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the foot in the door technique - freedom and Fraser 1966

A

persuader gets a person to agree to bestow to a small favor or to buy a small item, only to later request a larger favor or purchase a bigger item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are internal forms of attitude change

A
  • cognitive dissonance
  • tension we experience when thoughts are in conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

normative social influence

A

people conform to group norm to fit in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

informational social influence

A

people conform because they believe the group is competent and has the correct information, particularly when the task or situation is ambiguous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

group polarization

A

-strengthening of the original group attitude after discussing views within the group
- if a group initially favors a viewpoint after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

social facilitation

A

when an individual performs better when an audience is watching them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

social loafing

A

exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group, so group performance declines on easy tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

prejudice

A

a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on ones membership in a particular social group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

discrimination

A

negative action toward an individual as a result of ones membership in a particular group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

impression formation

A

assigning characteristics to other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is aschs configured model

A

people tend to not simply add up impressions but make holistic judgments based on specific info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
what's good about aschs configurational model
allows for summarizing and organizing of large and diverse info about a person
26
3 biases in impression formation
primacy effect, negativity bias and halo effect
27
primacy effect
earlier info has stronger influence than later info
28
negativity bias
negative info has stronger influence esp in social and moral situations
29
halo effect
assumption that someone with down positive/negative qualities also possesses additional undisclosed positive/negative qualities
30
schema
a set of expectations about the way the world works that affects the information we attend to and remember. It is a mental framework that organises and synthesises information.
31
what is emotional component of schema
prejudice
32
what is cognitive component of schema
stereotype
33
what is behavioral component of schema
discrimination
34
rebound effect
in case of stereotypes - when people suppress negative stereotypical thoughts, when not trying to suppress anymore their expressions become stronger
35
self-fulfilling prophecies
others expectations can cause us to "know ourselves" and behave in a way that's confirming those expectations
36
Harris and Rosenthal 1985
children at beginning of school year were randomly told they were particularly bright by teachers - these kids performed better at the end of the term
37
self perception theory - bem 1972
we learn about ourselves by observing how we behave
38
social comparison theory - festinger 1954
people are driven to gain accurate self-evaluations . self evaluation often achieved by comparing ourselves to others
39
3 ways to gain self knowledge
self-fulfilling prophecies, self-perception theory and social comparison theory
40
attribution theory
an explanation of how people develop a casual understanding of human behavior
41
who suggested the different causes of behavior
heider 1958
42
situation factors
- external causes - stimuli in the environment
43
dispositional factors
- internal causes - individual personality characteristics
44
what does Kelleys covariation theory say
attributions are made by 3 different principles
45
3 principles of covariation
consensus, consistency and distinctiveness
46
from Kelleys covariation theory what are the 4 types of attributions
1. the person - internal or dispositional 2. the stimulus - external or situational 3. the circumstance 4. combination
47
give an example of consensus
how do other people behave?
48
give an example of consistency
does x usually behave like this?
49
give an example of distinctiveness
is x's behavior in this situation different from x's behavior in other situations?
50
give 4 attributional biases
1. actor-observer effect 2. fundamental attribution error 3. false consensus 4. self-serving bias
51
what was the method for Jones and Harris 1967 study
- Participants read essays that either supported or opposed Fidel Castro (a controversial figure at the time). - They were informed that the essay writers had either: 1. Freely chosen their stance (pro-Castro or anti-Castro). 2. Been assigned their stance by the experimenters. - Participants were then asked to judge the essay writers' true attitudes toward Castro.
52
findings of jones and Harris 1967 study
- Even when participants knew the stance was assigned and the writer had no choice, they still tended to attribute the essay’s position to the writer's personal beliefs. - For example, if a writer presented a pro-Castro argument, participants often assumed the writer personally supported Castro, even if they knew the stance was assigned.
53
conclusion of jones and Harris 1967 study
- The study highlighted a cognitive bias where people tend to overestimate dispositional factors (e.g., personality, beliefs) and underestimate situational factors when explaining others' behavior. - This bias became known as the Fundamental Attribution Error or Correspondence Bias.
54
false consensus effect
the tendency for people to believe their own behavior is widely shared and their own views are consensual eg smoking (more people don't mind smoking).
55
what are some reasons for the false consensus effect
1. we surround ourselves with similar others 2. self as anchor - not adjusting from own view
56
self-serving bias
tendency to attribute ones success to dispositional characteristics and ones failures to situational factors
57
heuristics
mental shortcuts used to make judgements, past experiences is used for quick decision
58
advantage of cognitive shortcut
speed
59
disadvantage of cognitive shortcut
not always accurate
60
3 types of heuristic
1. representativeness heuristic 2. availability heuristic 3. anchoring and adjusting heuristic
61
representativeness heuristic
classifying something as belonging to a certain category to the extent that it is similar to the typical case eg a girl with glasses is a librarian
62
problems with representativeness heuristic
ignoring additional info eg base rate
63
Availability heuristic
estimate likelihood of event by ease with which instances of that event come to mind
64
conjunction fallacy
people incorrectly assume that the probability of two events occurring together (their conjunction) is more likely than the probability of either event occurring alone.
65
anchoring and adjusting heuristic
Estimates are made by starting with an initial value (anchor) that is adjusted to reach an answer
66
social physiology
the study of how thoughts, feelings, behavior of individuals are influenced by the actual, imagined or implied presence of definitional others
67
impression formation.
the way in which we attribute specific traits to peoeple
68
central traits
when people form impressions of other people, some traits have more influence than others in the final impression
69
mma went to see a play last night with her friends; although she thought that the play was quite good, Emma is hesitant to express her thoughts on the play until her friends all say that they enjoyed it. Emma then says that she enjoyed it as well. Emma's behaviour may best be explained in terms of which of the following?
social comparison theory
70
who had an empiricist view
locke
71
Which judgment heuristic is most likely a cause of the actor-observer difference?
availability

intro 2 psych (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions