What is culture? Flashcards
(44 cards)
What is culture?
- Matsumoto and Juang 2023
A unique meaning and information system, shared by a group and transmitted across generations, that allows the group to meet basic needs of suvival, pursue happiness and well-being, and derive meaning from life
Functional definition of culture
Culture is also a pair of glasses that we are constantly looking through - a schema to help us evaluate and organize information
What are people like?
- Every person is to some degree…
- like other people
- like some other people, and
- like no other person
Goals of cross-cultural psychology
Build a body of knowledge about people:
1. transport and test hypotheses and findings to other cultural settings
2. explore other cultures in order to discover cultural and psychological variations
3. Integrate findings into a more universal psychology
–> Improve people’s lives
(psychological research is based on studies among WEIRD samples)
WEIRD samples
Western Educated Industrialized Rich and Democratic sample
- not representative
- most authors and samples are WEIRD
- we need to know whether what we study holds for educated as well as uneducated people, industrialized or non-industrialized contexts
Origin of culture
Environments come with demands for adaption:
- climate
- resources
- population desity
–> for example the difference in rice/wheat farming
Latitudinal Psychology
Harsh climates induce environmental stress, which affects ways of living
- the stressors can be counteracted by greater affluence (like money)
3 theoretical approaches for cultural differences
- Hofstede and Triandis
- Markus and Kitayama
- Gelfand
Hofstede
- most cited general framework to classify cultural patterns on the country level
- examination of work-related values in employees of IBM during 1970s
- 4 classic dimensions –> later 6 (bottom up)
Hofstede’s four classic dimensions
- power distance
- individualism/collectivism
- mascuinity/femininity
- uncertainty/avoidance
Individualism
Pertains to societies in which the ties between individuals are loose: everyone is expected to look after himself and his immediate family
Collectivism
As its opposite pertains to societies in which people from birth onwards are integrated into strong cohesive in-groups, which throughout people’s lifetime continue to protect them in unquestioning loyalty
2 added dimensions to Hofstede’s 4
- happened in 2010
- Long-term/short-term orientation (short-term orientation is stuck in the way it has always been
- Indulgence
Criticism on Hofstede
Low face validity for individualism testing for example: long term orientation en Minkov
- no support for the differences that were predicted by the model
- power distance seems to be a part of indivudualism/collectivism
- uncertainty avoidance is not reliably measured
- masculinity/femininity does not predict criteria that were prespecified
Criticism long term orientation Hofstede
- normative societies score low on long term orientation and therefor stick to old traditions and what they know
- cultures with a high score are pragmatic and prepare for the future in culture
Minkov’s criticism on Hofstede
- analysed the model with new studies
- 4 questions
- power distance seems to be a part of IND and COLL
–> hofstede fails the test and needs serious revisioning
Triandis
- Vertical collectivism
- Horizontal collectivism
- Vertical individualism
- Horizontal collectivism
Vertical collectivism
Includes perceiving the self as a part of a collective and accepting inequalities within the collective
Horizontal collectivism
Includes perceiving the self as a part of the collective, but seeing all members of the collective as the same; thus equality is stressed
Vertical individualism
Includes the conception of an autonomous individual and acceptance of inequality
Horizontal individualism
Includes the conception of an autonomous individual and emphasis on equality
Difference between horizontal and vertical
Horizontal is everybody on the same line, so there is a lot of equality
Vertical is everybody on different levels (vertical), so there is acceptance of inequality
Markus and Kitayama
Independence and interdependence
- the self as the mediator of cultural differences: it’s construal differs across cultures
- the importance assigned to so-called public, relational and private, inner aspects of the self can vary by culture
Independence
Western: being different from others
- an independent self that is perceiving the self as somebody that is distinct from others