WT Flashcards
Under the common law, which of the following is not necessary for a testator to have capacity to execute a will?
* (A) An understanding of the
nature of their assets.
* (B) Gifts to the people who ought to receive gifts.
* (C) An understanding of the
extent of their assets.
* (D) An understanding of who the testator would ordinarily give gifts to.
B
EXCEPTIONs TO PRESUMPTION OF
KNOWLEDGE AND APPROVAL
- Testator is blind or illiterate or will signed on their behalf
- Suspicious circumstances
A person may challenge a will on the basis that the testator made the will as a result of:
* (A) Force, familial relationship,
fraud, or undue influence.
O (B) Force, fear, fraud, or undue
influence.
O (C) Fear, fraud, forgery, or undue
influence.
O (D) Fear, familial relationship, forgery, or undue influence.
(B) is correct. A person may challenge a will on the basis that the testator made the will as a result of force, fear, fraud, or undue influence.
WILL FORMALITIES
WILL FORMALITIES
* In writing
* Signed by testator
Signed or acknowledged by testator in presence of two or more witnesses
Signed by witnesses in presence of testator
What are 3 WILL FORMALITIES
To make a valid will, a testator must have (1) had capactiy at the time the will was made, (2) intended to make a will, and (3) executed the will in accordance with the statutory formalities.
When is capacity measured in determining whether a will was validly executed?
Capacity is measured at the time the testator executes the will. This means the testator must have the necessary mental capacity to understand the nature of making a will, the extent of their assets, and the implications of their decisions regarding beneficiaries at the moment they sign the will for it to be considered validly executed.
What are the two circumstances in which the presumption that the testor knew the contents of their will when they signed it does not apply?
The presumption that the testator knew the contents of their will when they signed it does not apply in two circumstances: first, if the testator was blind, illiterate, or otherwise incapable of reading the will themselves; and second, if there is evidence of fraud or undue influence that may have affected the testator’s understanding or approval of the will’s contents at the time of signing.
(1) If the testator was blind or illiterate when the will was signed, or (2) if the will was signed under suspicious circumstances, such as when the drafter of a will benefits under the will.
What must be proved to show a will was procured through undue influence?
To show a will was procured through undue influence, it must be proven that the influencer exerted excessive pressure on the testator, which overpowered the testator’s free will and decision-making capacity, leading to a will that reflects the desires of the influencer rather than the true intentions of the testator. This requires demonstrating a relationship where the testator was susceptible to such influence and that the resultant will is a product of this undue pressure.
VALID ALTERATIONS
Alteration made before will was executed or executed like a will
Will reads naturally after alteration
What are the requirements for an alteration of a will to be valid?
(check all that apply)
(A) The alteration was made before the will was executed.
(B) That the alteration is initialled by the testator and witnesses.
* (C) The alteration fills in a blank.
* (D) The will must read naturally after the alteration.
(A) and (D) are correct. (B) is one way of proving that the alteration was made prior to execution of the will, but it is not required. For example, the witnesses may alternatively give testimony that the change was made prior to execution. Similarly, the fact that the alteration fills in a blank line on a will form could be proof that the alteration was made before the will was executed.
UNATTESTED ALTERATIONSCODICIL
Document that adds to, amends, or partially revokes existing will
UNATTESTED ALTERATIONS
* Not signed or initialled
* Unattested alteration presumed to have been made after execution unless filling in blank space
What is CODICIL?
CODICIL
Document that adds to, amends, or partially revokes existing will
Let’s make sure we have these rules straight. Which of the following statements is true?
O (A) Divorce generally
revokes a will of one of the
parties that was in existence at the time of the divorce, but marriage generally does not.
O (B) Both marriage and
divorce generally revoke wills of the parties that were in existence at the time of the marriage or the divorce.
* (C) Marriage generally revokes a pre-existing will, and divorce generally revokes gifts to the former spouse in a will made before the divorce.
* (D) Neither marriage nor
divorce affects a will in
existence at the time the
testator marries or divorces
unless the testator so
declares.
(C) is correct. I did my best to confuse you with words, but hopefully I didn’t succeed. Remember our basic rule: marriage generally revokes an existing will of a party, but divorce revokes only gifts and appointments in favour of the former spouse.
IMPORTANT
Later will revokes earlier will to extent that later will is inconsistent with earlier will
- Match the result to the event by typing the letter of the consequence next to the corresponding conduct.
A - The will is revoked
B - The will is not revoked
C - The will is partly revoked
- The testator gets married three years after executing her will.
- The testator executes a will in 2017 and then executes a codicil in 2020.
- The testator, intending to revoke her will, throws it in a fire and burns it.
- The testator gets divorced five years after executing her will, which left most of her estate to her husband.
- The testator accidentally shreds her will while shredding other documents.
A
C
A
C
B
- What is a codicil?
* (A) A statutory provision that sets out one of the
rules for execution of a will.
* (B) A document executed after a will is executed
that changes one or more provisions of the will.
* (C) The space in a will set aside for the witnesses
to sign and attest to due execution of the will.
B
(B) is roughly the definition. There is no special name for (A), and (C) roughly describes an attestation clause. Remember that codicils are not as common as they once were - now that we can print a new will with the click of a mouse - but they were very useful in the age when new wills had to be retyped (or, before then, rewritten by a scribe) from scratch. In any case, the fact that they are not commonly used doesn’t mean that you won’t see the term on your exam, so take heed.
- True or False? If a testator was in posession of their will before they died, and the will cannot be found after the testator’s death, a rebuttable presumption will arise that the testator destroyed the will.
O True
O False
True
What is Legacy and Devise?
LEGACY
Gifts of personal property
DEVISE
Gift of real property
What types of legacies?
TYPES OF LEGACIES
* Specific: gift of particular asset identified in will
* General: gift that does not identify particular item
* Pecuniary: gift of cash
* Demonstrative: general legacy which identifies source of gift
* Residuary: gift of rest of deceased’s estate
Match the gift with the corresponding type of legacy by typing the correct letter in each box.
A - Demonstrative legacy
B - General legacy
C - Pecuniary legacy
D - Residuary legacy
E - Specific legacy
- “I give the rest of my estate to Iris.”
- “I give a laptop to Fran.”
- “I give £1,000 to Neil.”
- “I give my emerald ring to Sally.”
- “I give £5,000 to Megan, to be paid from my savings account held at XYZ Bank.
D
B
C
E
A
Just so you have this straight, if a gift is of “my car” or “my ring” when will the will be treated as speaking?
* (A) The date of the testator’s death.
O (B) The date of the will’s execution.
(B) is correct. Although the general rule is that gifts speak at the date of death, for gifts like these we presume that the testator had a contrary intention and wanted the beneficiary to receive the gift as it was on the day of the will’s execution.
SPeCIFIC GIFT FAILS IF IT:
SPeCIFIC GIFT FAILS IF IT:
* Is no longer part of the estate
* Is subject to binding contract for sale
* No longer meets description in will
A testator’s will leaves her estate to her son, her daughter, and her friend in equal shares. The son and the friend die before the testator, and they each leave one child. At the testator’s death, who inherits her estate?
* (A) The daughter only.
* (B) The son’s child only.
* (C) The daughter and the son’s child.
* (D) The daughter, the son’s child, and the friend’s
child.
(C) is correct. The daughter and the son’s child inherit the testator’s estate. If a gift is made to a testator’s child or other issue who dies before the testator and who leaves living issue, the living issue will receive the gift. Therefore, the son’s child receives the son’s gift. This rule does not save gifts to beneficiaries other than the testator’s issue, so the gift to the friend is not saved for the friend’s child.
- What’s the difference between lapse and ademption?
Lapse occurs when a beneficiary named in a will predeceases the testator, leading to the gift “lapsing” or failing, unless the will provides for an alternate arrangement. Ademption, on the other hand, happens when a specific bequest in a will (like a particular item or property) is no longer part of the testator’s estate at the time of their death, causing the gift to be “adeemed” or voided, as the specific item can no longer be given.