Forensic Psychology - 3. Biological Explanations for Crime: 1. Historic Approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the main historical biological approach?

A

Atavistic form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Are historic approaches still seen as valuable?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is the atavistic form in the specification when it isn’t valuable to explaining crime?

A

It laid down the foundations for people to start looking at reasons why some people turn to crime and some people don’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who proposed atavistic form? When?

A

Lombroso in the 1890s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Atavistic form (3)

A

Some people are ‘born criminals’
A criminal personality is innate
You can tell a criminal by the way they look

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does atavistic mean? What does this suggest?

A

Primitive, suggesting criminals have primitive physical features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were certain atavistic features associated with?

A

Certain atavistic features were associated with certain crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Crimes that linked to appearance features

A

Murder - bloodshot eyes
Sexual deviancy - fleshy lips and projecting ears
Fraud - thin and tall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Atavistic characteristics

A

Marks on face and head
Narrowing brow
Prominent jaw
Facial asymmetry
Curly hair
Long ears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aim of Lombroso’s 1876 study

A

To identify distinguishing physical characteristics among male criminals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Method of Lombroso’s 1876 study

A

Examined features and measurements of nearly 4000 criminals and the skulls of 400 dead criminals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Results of Lombroso’s 1876 study

A

40% of those examined had atavistic features

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Conclusion of Lombroso’s 1876 study

A

Those with primitive features were more likely to be criminals.
The criminals weren’t responsible for their actions as their actions were down to their innate, inherited psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Lombroso say about female offenders?

A

Women tended to be less atavistic than men however female offenders did have atavistic features such as:
Short
Wrinkly
Dark hair
Small skulls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who carried out research support for atavistic form? When?

A

Kurtzberg in 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Results of Kurtzberg’s study

A

Prisoners who had facial surgery after their release had recidivism rate of 42%.
Those who didn’t have surgery had recidivism rate of 70%

17
Q

Recidivism rate

A

Reoffending rate

18
Q

What could explain the results of Kurtzberg’s facial surgery study?

A

The offenders may have got surgery to regain confidence and let go of their appearance as a criminal - to start a new life

19
Q

Positive evaluation of atavistic form: influence

A

Lombroso was the first person to bring science and biology of a person to the study of crime, which laid the foundation for further research

20
Q

Positive evaluation of atavistic form: research

A

Evidence from himself and Kurtzberg supports his idea

21
Q

Positive evaluation of atavistic form: future studies

A

Led to further studies of biological explanations for crime like genes and brain structure

22
Q

Negative evaluation of atavistic form: correlation

A

Correlation doesn’t mean causation

23
Q

Negative evaluation of the atavistic form: biological determinism

A

Doesn’t acknowledge that individuals have free will (choice to commit crime, instead of crime being innate)

24
Q

Negative evaluation of the atavistic form: control group

A

No control group in his research as he didn’t take measurements of non-criminals

25
Q

Negative evaluation of the atavistic form: study between criminals and non-criminals

A

Goring compared 3000 criminals to 3000 non-criminals and found no differences between the groups in terms of facial characteristics

26
Q

Negative evaluation of the atavistic form: racist

A

DeLisi branded this explanation as racist, arguing that just because an individual has certain features, doesn’t mean they are criminal