Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology > Memory - Factors Affecting Accuracy Of EWT > Flashcards

Memory - Factors Affecting Accuracy Of EWT Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards
1
Q

EWT

A

Eyewitness testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of discussion is EWT?

A

Post-event discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Post-event discussion

A

Discussion based on memory which could be filled with misleading information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Leading question

A

Question that prompts the answer wanted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Example of a leading question and why it is a leading question

A

Did you see the women hit the dog? Leading question because it assumes a women hit the dog

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who carried out the ‘Car Crash’ study in 1974?

A

Loftus and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Aim of Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study

A

To investigate if leading questions distort accuracy of eyewitnesses’ immediate recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Participants of Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study

A

45 students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were all students shown in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study?

A

A short video clip of a car crash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many groups were the 45 students in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study split into?

A

5 groups of 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What type of question were all the participants in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study asked?

A

A critical question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Question asked to all groups in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study

A

How fast were the cars going when they ____ each other?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What words filled the gap of the question in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study?

A

Each of the 5 groups had different words in the questions: smashed, collided, bumped, hit or contacted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

IV in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study

A

The verb used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DV in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study

A

The estimate of speed given by the participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What research methods was used in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study?

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What experimental design was used in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study?

A

Independent groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When the verb ‘smashed’ was used in the question, what was the mean estimate of speed for the group in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study?

A

40.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

When the verb ‘contacted’ was used in the question, what was the mean estimate of speed for the group in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study?

A

31.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe the results of Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study

A

The higher the intensity of the verb, the higher the mean estimate speed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What did the manipulation of the IV in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study change? What does this establish?

A

Caused the DV to change which established a cause-and-effect relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Positive of using lab experiment in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study

A

Extraneous variables could be controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How were extraneous variable controlled in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study?

A

All participants watched the same video

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What prevented demand characteristics in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Car Crash’ study?

A

The use of distractor questions as they allowed participants to not know what the researcher was hoping to find out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Who carried out the ‘Broken Glass’ study in 1974?

A

Loftus and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How many participants were there in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study?

A

150 student participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What were the participants shown in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study?

A

A multi-vehicle car accident video

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What were participants told to do following watching the video in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study

A

Complete a questionnaire about it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How many groups were the participants of Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study split into?

A

3 groups of 50

30
Q

What was each group asked in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study in the questionnaire following watching the video? (3 different)

A

One group: How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?
One group: How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?
One group: Asked no question about speed

31
Q

What questions were all the groups asked in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study?

A

Distractor questions

32
Q

What were all participants asked a week after completing the questionnaire in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study?

A

Did you see any broken glass? Although there was no broken glass in the video

33
Q

For the group who was asked the questions with the verb ‘smashed’ in it, how many said there was glass and how many said there wasn’t in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study?

A

16/50 said yes
34/50 said no

34
Q

For the group who was asked the questions with the verb ‘hit’ in it, how many said there was glass and how many said there wasn’t in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study?

A

7/50 said yes
43/50 said no
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW FOR EXAM: Majority said no for the verb ‘hit’

35
Q

For the group who was asked no question about speed, how many said there was glass and how many said there wasn’t in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study?

A

6/50 said yes
44/50 said no

36
Q

Conclusion of Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study

A

Verb used in critical question influenced whether participants stated they had seen broken glass

37
Q

What explains reason for the control group in Loftus and Palmer’s ‘Broken Glass’ study saying there was broken glass?

A

The use of schema. They have expectation that broken glass would be present in a car crash

38
Q

What two thing happen when we see an event according to Loftus and Palmer? What happens to these two things?

A
  1. We take in information of what we have seen
  2. We get other information supplied to us
    These two things amalgamate so we can no longer separate what we saw and what we were told
39
Q

Amalgamate

A

Combine

40
Q

Criticism of Loftus and Palmer’s research

A

Lacks ecological validity as participants weren’t watching a car crash in real-life as they only saw a video

41
Q

Who conducted a field study in 1986 which contrasted with Loftus and Palmer’s research?

A

Yuille and Cutshall

42
Q

Aim of Yuille and Cutshall’s field study

A

Find out if EWT for real events can be influenced by misleading information and how reliable the EWT is

43
Q

Procedure of Yuille and Cutshall’s field study

A

13 witnesses to a robbery and murder in Canada were re-interviewed 5 months after the crime happened

44
Q

What crime happened in Yuille and Cutshall’s field study?

A

Young man robbed gun store and shot the shop owner

45
Q

How many misleading questions did the re-interview in Yuille and Cutshall’s field study include?

A

2

46
Q

What effect did the misleading questions have on EWT in Yuille and Cutshall’s field study?

A

No effect

47
Q

How accurate was the participants recall of the crime in Yuille and Cutshall’s field study?

A

Very accurate

48
Q

Despite the violent nature of the crime, what were the witnesses accounts of the crime like in Yuille and Cutshall’s field study?

A

Very reliable and accurate

49
Q

Conclusion of Yuille and Cutshall’s field study

A

Witnesses of real-life incidents had accurate memories, even when incident involved high levels of anxiety

50
Q

In a post-event discussion, what may the original memory of an event be distorted by?

A

By discussion of the event with other people

51
Q

What can distort original memory?

A

Repeated interviews

52
Q

Memory conformity

A

People being influenced by another person’s report

53
Q

What does memory conformity result in?

A

Individual’s memory report becoming more similar to another

54
Q

Source monitoring theory

A

Memories of events are generally distorted as the eyewitnesses can recall information about the event, but can’t recall where the information came from

55
Q

Source confusion

A

You become confused of where you got the information from

56
Q

Why does the recall of eyewitnesses change according to the conformity theory?

A

Because they go along with accounts of co-witnesses

57
Q

Why may people go along with accounts of co-witnesses?

A

For social approval or because they generally believe in what they are saying

58
Q

Who carried out a study into post-event discussion?

A

Wright et al

59
Q

Procedure of Wright et al’s study into post-event discussion

A

Showed pairs of participants an identical crime, except half saw accomplice with the thief and half didn:t

60
Q

How accurate were the initial memories of Wright et al’s study into post-event discussion

A

Very accurate

61
Q

After discussing the crime with another person in the pair who saw a different sequence, what percentage of pairs showed conformity by saying they had seen an accomplice with the thief in Wright et al’s study into post-event discussion?

A

75%

62
Q

What law shows the role of anxiety on accuracy of EWT?

A

The Yerkes-Dodson Law

63
Q

According to The Yerkes-Dodson Law, what do we have when undergoing a period of stress?

A

We all have an optimum level of stress to help us deal with stressful situation/period

64
Q

What is an optimum level of stress?

A

A level of stress that is beneficial for an individual

65
Q

What improves with an increase in arousal (stress) and up to what point, according to The Yerkes-Dodson Law?

A

Performance improves up to an optimum point

66
Q

Performance if you are not releasing the optimum level of adrenaline (either too much or not enough)

A

Performance will be low

67
Q

How does The Yerkes-Dodson Law link to EWT?

A

People who are very close to the crime could give incorrect eyewitness accounts because the law suggests that when stress levels are too high, our performance is poor

68
Q

What is the point of a cognitive interview?

A

To gather information from cooperative witnesses to increase the quantity and quality of information

69
Q

What is the primary rule of a cognitive interview and why?

A

Let witness to most of the talking to ensure witness is using their own words and memory

70
Q

Cognitive reinstatement

A

Interviewers ask EW to slow down and think about process of crime in a lot of detail

Psychology (104 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions