Prevalence and trends of common mental disorders - NEMESIS (Ten Have, Tuithof et al) Flashcards

1
Q

welke wave was dit

A

3e

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

wat voor sample

A
  • nationally representative
  • 18-64
  • 6646 subject
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

wat voor methode

A

face to face interview, composite international diagnostic interview 3.0 (CIDI) gebaseerd op de dsm 5 (en dsm 4 werd ook in meegenomen)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Trends in 12-month prevalence rates of DSM-IV mental disorders were examined by …

A

comparing these rates between NEMESIS-3 and NEMESIS-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

wat was de lifetime prevalentie van anxiety disorders

A

28.6%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

wat was de lifetime prevalentie van mood disorders

A

27.6%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

wat was de lifetime prevalentie van substance use disorders

A

16.7%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

wat was de lifetime prevalentie van attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

A

3.6%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

wat was de 12-month prevalentie van anxiety disorders

A

15.2%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

wat was de 12-month prevalentie van mood disorders

A

9.8%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

wat was de 12-month prevalentie van substance use disorder

A

7.1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

wat was de 12-month prevalentie van ADHD

A

3.2%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

wat was het verschil in 12 maanden prevalentie voor en na covid

A

er was geen significant verschil, voor alle 4 de disorder categorieen:
voor = 26.7%
tijdens = 25.7%

(hierbij was ook gecontrolleerd voor verschillen in socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents interviewed in these two periods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

wat was het verschil tussen 2007-2009 en 2019-2022 van the 12-month prevalence rate of any DSM-IV disorder

A

this significantly increased from 17.4% to 26.1%.

(dus vanaf 2007 tot 2022 hebben mensen significant meer DSM 4 disorders)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

voor wie was de sterkte increase in prevalence

A
  • studenten
  • younger adults (18-34 years)
  • city dwellers (=stadsbewoner)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

wat laat deze data zien?

A
  • These data suggest that the prevalence of mental disorders has increased in the past decade, but this is not explained by the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • The already high mental disorder risk of young adults has particularly further increased in recent years.
17
Q

er is nog niet echt consensus over of er nou een stijging is, studies vinden verschillende dingen

A

oke

18
Q

wat is een limiet aan die studies

A

focussen vooral op mdd (niet op substance & anxiety), en gebruiken vaak self report en geen fully structured diagnostic interviews

19
Q

wat voor factoren hebben de prevalentie van mental disorders in the general population of western countries veranderd

A
  • the economic crisis that started in 2008
  • the increased income inequality
  • the further individualization of society
  • the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
20
Q

the reported rise in mental health care use might indicate that the prevalence has increased, but…

A

may also be explained by:
- improved accessibility
- efficiency
- capacity of care

21
Q

wat was de lifetime prevalentie van dsm 5 mood/anxiety/substance/adhd? (dus in totaal)

A

48.4%

(ongeveer de helft)

22
Q

wat was de 12 maanden prevalentie van al deze disorders

A

25.9%

(dus een kwart)

23
Q

wat zijn de trends in hoe mensen de zorg gebruiken?

A
  • increase in use of specialized mental health care (6.2% tot 10.0%)
  • increase in unmet need for care (1.8% tot 4.0%)
24
Q

hoe vergelijkt NL hierin tot andere landen

A

lifetime & 12 month prevalence is gelijk aan die reported in de US, maar hoger dan die van andere europese landen

25
Q

US showed similar rates of DSM-5 mood and anxiety disorders, but higher rates of substance use disorders.These findings show that mental disorders are quite common in the general population. It is important to recognize, though, that not all mental disorders are severe. Mild and moderate cases are nonetheless meaningful, because even mild disorders can be impairing and
often evolve into severe mental disorders over time.

A

oke

26
Q

wat zijn de kenmerken van mensen met 12 month DSM 5 disorders in NEMESIS 3 (meer dan net)

A
  • young age
  • sex: female = anxiety & mood, male = substance and ADHD
  • living alone
  • unemployed
  • low education or low income
  • higher degree of urbanization
27
Q

post hoc analysen lieten zien dat de increase in prevalence started before the initiation of nemesis 3

A

oke

28
Q

waarom denken ze dat studenten & jongere mensen meer zijn gehit door de 12 month prevalence (vergeleken met mensen met betaalde baan en ouder dan 35)

A
  • meer affected by individualization of society
  • social media
  • increasing pressure to succeed
  • social problems (housing and climate change)
  • difficulty coping with setbacks (zoals successfull job and house)
  • retired people minder want zij worden waarschijnlijk minder geraakt door societal problems zoals economic crisis or current social problems than the employed
  • beter in herkennen en toegeven van mentale problemen
29
Q

Living in a city may come with more dis-
advantages today than before.

A

oke

30
Q

Among retired people, a smaller increase in disorder prevalence was found, perhaps because …

A

they have been less affected by the long-term consequences of the economic crisis that started in 2008, or are less adversely affected by current social problems than the employed.

31
Q

the increase in mood & anxiety could be due to….

A

people being more likely to recognize and admit mental health problems (maar niet zo’n groot effect wss, omdat ze vroegen naar symptomen in plaats van naar de disorder: minder een taboe)

32
Q

wat was het enige verschil dat ze zagen door de covid pandemic

A

substance abuse ging heel erg omlaag in 6 month prevalence

wss door de lockdown

33
Q

wat waren de limitaties

A
  • cidi 3.0 aanpassingen niet getest
  • retrospective recall (= underreporting)
  • survey non-response could lead to bias (want dat zijn een bepaald soort mensen, maar hiervoor gechecked en niet echt groot verschil)
  • geen mensen die niet goed NL kunnen, geen huisadres hadden en institutionalized werden niet meegenomen
34
Q

To conclude, the present study shows that the mental state of a population is subject to gradual changes, probably related to long-
term sociocultural developments, and that youngsters and city dwellers seem to be more sensitive to these developments. The study also shows that adversities of shorter duration (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) have little or no effect on that mental state. This could suggest effective resilience and adaptation, although time-lag effects of the pandemic may yet be felt. These findings
reaffirm the role of social determinants as risk factors for common mental disorders, and the need to develop and implement effective mental health promotion programmes, and to ensure timely access to mental health care, especially for young people.

A

oke

35
Q

wat was het doel van dit artikel

A
  • prevalentie en trends onderzoeken van common mental disorders in the nederlands, van 2007-2022
  • lifetime and 12 month prevalence rates van depression, anxiety and substance use disorders
  • impact van covid 19 pandemic
36
Q

wat voor sampling procedure

A

stratified, random

37
Q

wanneer was first wave van NEMESIS 3 uitgevoerd

A

voor en tijdens covid

38
Q

which explanations were ruled out

A
  • small difference in clinical assessment tools between nemesis 2 and nemesis 3: they both used similar questions
  • nemesis 3 conducted assessment via videocalling, but there is no significant difference between 12 month and lifetime prevalences between face to face interviewed and video interviewed
  • the change in population structure: to small compared to the sharp increase in prevalence of mental disorders
  • covid 19 pandemic: the pandemic was not associated with a higher prevalence of mental disorders in the general population
39
Q

limitations of the study

A
  • validity and reliability of the cidi 3.0 were not formally tested
  • prevalence rates are based on retrospective recall (diagnosing within the lifetime, but not within the past 12 months) which could result in underreporting
  • non-responses could lead to bias
  • representative of the dutch population but there were a few exclusion criteria (no dutch, no permanent residential adress, long term institutionalization)