Fagen Et Al (Evaluation/ Issues and debates) Flashcards

1
Q

Nature explanations

A
  • The adult elephant did not sucessfully learn teh trunk wahsing procedure whislst the juveniles did
  • This could have been due to her age (in her 50s)
  • Aging can lead to many impariments in cognitive ability such as memeory, attension, the ability to learn new tasks and information.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define nature

A

The chaarcteristics we are born with or develop out of teh natural maturation process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Nurture

A
  • The characteristics we develop as a result of learning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nurture explanations

A
  • The trainers shaped the elephants behaviour through postive reinforcement. (adminsitering food rewards)
  • Thus the perfomamce of the trunk wash was a learned behaviour through postive reinforcement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define situational

A
  • Behaviours influenced by the external enviroment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Situational explanations

A
  • It was the situation of the consistent application of postive reinforcement/ SPR training adminstered by the trainers
  • That led to the behavioural changes of the juvenile elephants (learnt the proceduree)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Individual explanations definition

A
  • Behaviours that are influenced by factors within the person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Indiviudal explanations

A
  • Not all of the elephants sucessfuly completed all of the tasks at the same rates
  • This may have been caused by indiviudal differences like differing persoanlities (wilingness to learn) or differing cognitive abilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate the ethics of the research

A
  1. HOUSING: Met the requirements for suitable housing. Could graze freely for the majority of teh day. Natural diet of fresh grass, grain, nutritional supplements. Able to socialise with the other elephants in the jungle
  2. RIGHT TO WITHDRAW: Elephants could choose not to engage with a session by turning/ walking away from the trainer
  3. Protection from harm: No evidence that the elephants were harmed/distressed by the procedure
  4. Number of animals: Minimal number of animals used who already were bred in captivity/ had experince in training
  5. Reward, deprivition and aversive stimuli: Reward used rather than punishment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the practical issues when working with animals

A
  1. It was easy to require the sample as the elphants were already in captivity/familar with handlers
  2. The training too place over several weeks (impractical with humans unlikely to give up time)
  3. The elephants were motivated by intermittent food rewards (harder to motivate humans)
  4. Training tassk were tailored to the indiviudal needs of elephants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe 2 real world applications of the study

A
  • The study showed postive reinforcement techniques could be used to obtain trunk wash samples (as most of the elephants were sucessfuly trained to give an accuate/sufficent sample)
  • Accurate TB testing can help both elephants and humans, As the disease is transmissable between species.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly