Attachment Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

Caregiver-infant reactions key points

A
  1. Reciprocity- turn taking/reciprocal interaction
  2. Alert phases- signal readiness
  3. Active involvement- babies aren’t passive
  4. Interactional synchrony- mirror actions
  5. Interactional synchrony begins
  6. Importance of attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Attachment definition

A

Attachment refers to a close emotional bond between two people, normally an infant and the primary caregiver (usually the mother). Each individual sees the other as essential for their emotional security.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Caregiver-infant interactions- Reciprocity

A
  • A two-way process of interaction, turn taking (like a dance).
  • Caregiver + baby respond to and elicit responses from each other
  • For example: caregiver smiles and the baby giggles or the baby cries and the caregiver comforts baby
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions- Alert phases

A
  • Babies have alert phases where they signal they are ready for a spell of interaction
  • Research: Mothers successfully respond 2/3 of a time
  • From 3 months interaction interaction is more frequent + more reciprocal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions: Active role

A
  • Traditional view: babies are passive + just recieve care from adult
  • Babies + caregivers take active roles
  • Both can initiate interactions and take turns doing so
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions: Interactional Synchrony

A
  • Temporal coordination of micro-level social behaviour Behaviours coordinate in time /move in the same pattern.
  • Example: Mimicking facial expressions and voices.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions- Synchrony begins

A
  • Meltzoff and Moore: Interactional synchrony can begin at 2 weeks old
  • Adult expressed 1 of 3 facial expressions/hand gesturesBabies responses were filmed
  • Babies’ responses mirrored adults more than chance would predict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Interacaction synchrony: Importance for attachment

A
  • Isabella et al.: Observed 30 mothers + babies and measured levels of synchrony
  • Also assessed quality of mother + baby attachment
  • High levels of synchrony associated with high levels of mother baby attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions: Strengths

A

Filmed interactions in a lab
* Distractions = controlled
* Films analysed later –> key behaviours not missed
* More than 1 observer –> inter-rater-reliability established
* Babies unaware they’re observed (issue for overt observations)
* Good reliability + validity

Practical application in parental skills training
* Research: 10 min parent-child interaction therapy (PCITU) improved interactional synchrony in 20 low income mothers + their pre-school children Counterpoint: Research is socially sensitive
* Argues mothers returning to work too soon risk damaging baby development
* Encourages harmful stereotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions: Limitations

A

Hard to interpret baby’s behaviour
* Observations = small hand movemtns + subtle expression changes
* Eg, is baby smiling or passing wind
* Cannot determine baby POV
* Eg, is hand movement a twitch or triggered by caregiver?

Observing a behaviour =/= developmental importance
* Synchrony gives name to observable patterns
* Can be reliably observed but purpose not determinable
* Reciprocity + synchony may not be important for development
* Counterpoint: Other research: early interactions = important
* Good interactional synchrony –> good quality attachment developed
* Probs important in development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Schaffer’s stages of attachment

A
  • Asocial stage
  • Indiscriminate attachment
  • Specific attachment
  • Multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stage 1 in attachment stages

A
  • Behaviour toward inanimate objects is very similar to behaviour towards humans
  • Prefer familiar people + comforted easier
  • Forming bonds with certain people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stage 2 of attachment

A
  • Indiscriminate 2-7 months
  • Prefer people over inanimate objects
  • Recognise + prefer familiar people
  • No stranger or separation anxiety
  • Indiscriminate as attachment is the same towards all
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stage 3 of attachment

A
  • Specific attachment 7 months- 1 year
  • Strange anxiety + seperation anxiety when seperated from one particular person
  • Formed specific attachment with primary attachment figure
  • Mother in 65% of cases
  • Person who offers most interaction and responds to baby’s signals with the most skill
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stage 4 of attachment

A
  • Multiple attachments
  • Secondary attachments with other adults form
  • Shaffer + Emmerson’s study: 29% of babies had secondary attachments within a month of forming a primary attachment
  • By 1 year majority of infants has multiple secondary attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Shaffer and Emerson (1964) Stages of Attachment Procedure

A
  • 60 babies from Glasgow, most from working-class families
  • Researcher visited baby + mother at home every month for a year
  • And once at 18 months
  • Seperation anxiety measured by mothers writing in a diary + being asked qurstion about behaviour during everyday seperations
  • Stranger anxiety measured by baby’s response to researcher + asking mothers question about anxiety towards strangers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Shaffer and Emerson (1964) Stages of Attachment Findings

A
  • Babies developed attachments through a sequence of stages (stages 1-4 of attachment)
  • Specific attachment= person who was most interactive + sensitive to babies signals + facial expressions (i.e. reciprocity)
  • Specific attachment =/= peson baby spent most time with (sometimes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Schaffer’s stages of attachment strengths

A

**High external validity **
* Most observations made by parents during ordinary activities
* Alternative= observers present in home –> babies feel anxious or distracted
* So pps behaved normally
* Counterpoint
* Mothers likely = biased in their observations
* Eg may not have noticed signs of anxiety
* Unreliable observer
* Social desireability bias

Real-world Application
* Practical application in daycare
* Asocial + disriminate stages –> daycare is simple as easy to comfort
* Specific attachment –> problematic (especially starting w/ unfamiliar adult)
* Stages used to plan daycare start

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Limitations of Schaffer’s stages of attachment

A

Poor evidence for asocial stage
* Young babies= poor co-ordination + faily immobile
* Hard to observe if babies less than 2 months felt anxiety as signs= subtle
* Difficulty reporting to researchers
* Babies may be social but appear asocial from flawed methods

Low generaliseability cross-cultures
* Positive= large-scale study with good design Negative= only 1 sample, from 1960s, working-class, Glasgow. Collectivist cultures form multiple attachments from early age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is meant by the term attachment? (2 marks)

A

Attachment is a strong, enduring, emotional and reciprocal bond between two people, especially an infant and caregiver.

21
Q

What is meant by the term ‘reciprocity’ in the context of caregiver-infant interaction (2 marks)

A

Reciprocity – caregiver-infant interaction is a two-way/mutual process; each party responds to the other’s signals to sustain interaction (turn-taking). The behaviour of each party elicits a response from the other.

22
Q

What are the three key views on the role of the father

A
  • Mothers as primary attachment figures
  • Fathers as playmates
  • Fathers as primary attachment figures
23
Q

Role of father: Mother as primary attachment figure

A

Women are primary attachment figures due to:
* 9 months of pregnancy
* Oxytocin release during breastfeeding (strengthens bond)
* Schaffer & Emerson (1964) findings:
* Majority of babies attached to mother first
* 27%: Father was joint first attachment
* 3%: Father was sole attachment figure

24
Q

Role of Father: Father as playmates

A
  • Fathers have a distinct role as playmates, aiding cognitive development
    Grossman et al. (2002) Longitudinal Study:
  • Quality of father’s play in infancy linked to adolescent attachment
  • Early attachment to father was less significant than to mother
25
Role of father: Father as Primary attachment figures
* Fathers can be primary attachment figures if they respond sensitively * Fathers also experience a rise in oxytocin during fatherhood **Field (1978) Study:** * Filmed 4-month-old infants interacting with caregivers * Primary caregiver fathers (like mothers) spent more time: * Smiling * Imitating * Holding infants * Responsiveness is key to attachment, not gender
26
Strengths of role of a father
**Real-world application** * Offer parental advice * Reduces pressure on mothers to be primary caregivers. * Reassures single-mother and lesbian families that child development is not hindered.
27
Weaknesses of roles of the father
**Researchers are interested in different questions** * Some aim to find out fathers ability to take on a maternal-like role * Some find role of father as a distinct role from mother * Hard to draw simple conclusions **Researchers can seem conflicting** * Grossman et al. --> fathers play a key role in play and stimulation + secondary caregivers. * However, research on lesbian and single-mother households shows no negative impact on child development, suggesting a father may not be essential.. * ***Counterpoint***: * These findings may not actually conflict—perhaps in heterosexual families, fathers naturally take on a unique role, but in other family structures, caregivers adapt to fill this role. **Bias may effect research** * Preconceptions surrounding a father's behaviour eg parenting style * Cause observations to be subjective * Eg observe more rough play * ***Counterpoint:*** * Standardised procedures + researcher insight should consider bias + control EVs
28
Lorenz (1952) Animal studies Procedure
* Randomly divided a clutch of goose eggs * 1/2 hatched with mother goose in natural environment * 1/2 hatched in an incubator wjere the first moving object they saw was Lorenz * Goslings mixed together to see who they would follow * Observed birds and their later courtship behaviour
29
Lorenz (1952) Findings and Conclusions
* Incubator group followed Lorenz * Control group followed mother * Identified critical period in which imprinting needs to take place= a few hours after hatching * Chicks did not attach themself to the mother figure if attachment did not occur in time * Sexual imprinting was observed * Birds that imprinted on a human would display courtship behaviours towards humans
30
Strength of Lorenz's research
**Research support** * Research: Exposed chicks to simple shape combinations that moved * When shown a range of moving shapes the chicks dollowed these in preference to other shapes * Suggests young animals are born wuth an innate mechanism to imprint on a moving object **Application to human behaviour** * Concept of imprinting can explain some human behaviour * 'Baby duck syncdrome' in computer users--> become attached to their first operating system * Imprinting is a meaningful process in humans + birds
31
Limitation of Lorenz's animal study
*** Hard to generalise from birds to humans** * The mammilian attachment system is different to birds * Eg, mammailian mothers show more emotional attachment to their young * In mammals attachment is a two way proces
32
Harlow (1958) Animal study procedure
* Harlow reared 16 monkeys with two wire model mothers * Condition 1- milk dispensed by plain-wire 'mother' * Condition 2- milk dispensed by cloth-covered 'mother' * Monkey's frightened by a noisy mechanical teddy bear * Preferences measured * Studied moneky's who had been deprived into adulthood
33
Harlow (1958) Animal study findings and conclusion
* Baby monkeys cuddled the cloth covered mother regardless of which dispensed milk * Comfort = more important than food when it comes to attachment behaviour * Sought comfort from cloth covered mother when frightened * Deprived monkeys were more agressive and less skilled in mating as adults
34
Limitations of Harlow (1958) animal study
**Hard to generalise to humans** * Mammals all share some similiarities in their attachment systems * But monekys are not humans * Human mind + behaviour = complex * Generalising is not appropriate **Ethical isssues** * Cause long term distress to monkeys * Eg neglection caused bad behaviour in later life * Should not have happened * But it had important practical + theoretical applications
35
Strengths of Harlow (1958) animal study
*** Real-world value** * Helped social workers understand risk factors in child abuse and thus intervene to prevent it * Understand importance of attachment figures for baby monkeys in zoos and breeding programmes * research benefitied animals and humans
36
What are the three key points in the learning theory explanation for attachment
* Classical conditioning of attachment * Operant conditioning: learning through consequences * Attachment is a secondary drive
37
Classical conditioning for the learning theory of attachment
**Classical conditioning for the learning theory of attachment:** Food (UCS) -> pleasure (UCR) Caregiver (NS) -> No response Food (UCS) + Caregiver (NS) -> Pleasure (UCR) Caregiver (CS) -> Pleasure (CR)
38
Role of operant conditioning in the learning theory for attachment
* Explains why babies cry for comfort * Crying leads to response from caregiver eg feeding * Crying is reinforced as it produces a pleasurable consequence * Negative reinforcement is given to caregiver as crying stops so they're more likely to comfort baby in future * Positive/negative reinforcements strengthens attachment bond
39
Drive reduction in the learning theory for attachment
* Hunger is a primary drive as it is an innate biological motivator * Motivated to eat to reduce hunger drive * Attachment is a secondary drive learned by association between caregiver and satisfaction of primary drive * As caregivers provide food, the primary drive becomes generalised to them
40
Limitations of learning theory as an explanation for attachment
**Counterevidence from Lorenz** * Lorenz's geese imprinted on the first moving object they saw * Regardless of association with food * Attachment is innate as it occurs during the first few weeks (critical period) * It is a primary drive * Not a result of feeding **Counterevidence from Harlow** * Harlow's monkeys sort comfort and showed preference towards the soft surrogate mother even when the wire surrogate mother was the one providing food * Goes against need for food to form attachment * No classical conditioning * Suggests attachment is also a primary drive, not learnt through association **Counterevidence from human research** * Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found many babies main attachment was not person who fed them * Isabella et al found interactional synchrony (unrelated to feeding) predicted attachment quality * Other factors are more important to attachment than feeding
41
Strengths of learning theory as an explanation for attachment
**Elements of conditioning could still be involved** * Unlikely food is central to attachment but it may play some role * A baby's primary attachment figure may be determined by which caregiver becomes associated with warmth and comfort * Conditioning could be important in choice of attachment figure but not the process of attachment formation * **Counterpoint** * Ignores fact that baby take an active role in interactions that produce attachment * Eg, they initiate reactions * So learning theory could be innapropriate in explaining any aspect of attachment
42
Bowlby's monotropy theory key points
* Adaptive * Social releasers * Critical period * Monotropy * Internal Working model
43
Bowlby's monotropy theory- Adaptive
Adaptive: * Attachment is an innate system that has evolved through natural selections because it gives evolutionary advantage. * Influenced by Lorenz: Infants stay close to caregiver like bird imprinting
44
Bowlby's monotropy theory- Social releasers
* **Social releasers:** * Babies are born with innate social releasers that activate the adult attachment system * Behavioural characteristics eg smiling + crying * Physical characteristics eg big eyes * Help to build bond
45
Bowlby's monotropy theory- Critical period
Critical period: * Attachment system is most active around 6 months * This has been extended to a sensitive period of 2 years * Hard to form an attachment if not formed during this time
46
Bowlby's monotropy theory- Monotropy
Monotropy: * Infants have an innate tendency to form one (mono) special attachment to one primary attachment figure. * Qualitatively different and more important than other attachments. * **The law of continuity:** Care should be constant and predictable to aid strong attachment * **The law of accumulated separation:** The negative effects of separation add up- the safest dose is zero
47
Bowlby's monotropy theory- Internal Working Model (IWM)
* Infants form a mental representation of their relationship with their primary caregiver. * This serves as a model or template for future relationships. * If an infant experiences relationships to be loving and reliable, she will expect future relationships to be so. * The IWM will also impact on the infant’s ability to be a parent themself when older (continuity hypothesis).
48
Limitations of Bowlby's theory
**Validity of monotropy challenged** * Schaffer and Emerson= that in a significant minority of cases multiple attachments were formed at the same time * First attachment seems to have most influence so might be stronger * Not nesseraily different quality * Other attachments may provide same key qualities * Also see multiple attachments in collectivist culture families **Feminist concerns** * Law of continuity + accumulated separation suggest working mothers may negatively affect child's emotional development * Gives excuse to restrict + blame mothers ***Counterpoint:** * Real-world applicarion in key workers in day care who build attachments to particular babies
49
Strengths of Bowlby's theory
**Animal studies:** * Lorenz: Goslings imprinted on first moving object + stuck with them, supports monotropy * Identified critical period of a few hours otherwise imprinting does not occur. Supports critical period * Harlow: Also identified critcal period until attachment was impossible * Monkey's without mothers = more agressive in later life + neglected young * Supports IWM **Support from still face experiment:** * Brazelton’s still face experiment demonstrated that when the primary caregiver put on a ‘still face’ (no reaction), the baby tried harder for a reaction, eventually crying, and some curled up and lay motionless * Cute behaviours are designed to create response within adult