5018 Unit 4 Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

What reinforcer effectiveness refers to

A
  1. Momentary capacity to support responses that produce it.

2. Utility in producing long-term behavior change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Operations that alter the prolonged value of a stimulus

A

Repeated exposure
Value enhancing effects/ Value diminishing effects
Stimulus Pairings
Contingency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Determinants of Stimulus Value

A
Delay
Rate
Quality
Magnitude
Motivating Operations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Delay as a determinant of stimulus value

A

Delays to reinforcement can weaken effectiveness of behavioral arrangements and result in the decrease in the value of a reinforcer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rate as a determinant of stimulus value

A

Rate of reinforcement affect relative response allocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Organisms will distribute behavior among concurrently available alternatives in same proportion that reinforcers distributed among those alternatives

A

Matching Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Conceptualized in terms of level of preference

A

Quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can vary according to quantity, intensity, or duration

A

Magnitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

An environmental event, operation, or stimulus condition that serves 2 functions

A

Motivating Operation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Two functions of MO

A

Reinforcer-establishing function

Evocative function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Momentarily alters the reinforcing effectiveness of other events

A

Reinforcer-establishing function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Momentarily alters the frequency of occurrence of the type of behaviors that produces those other events as a consequence

A

Evocative function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Momentarily increases the reinforcing effectiveness of stimulus and momentarily increases the frequency of behavior that produce the stimulus as a consequence

A

Stimulus deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Momentarily decreases the reinforcing effectiveness of stimulus and momentarily decreases the frequency of behavior that produce the stimulus as a consequence

A

Stimulus satiation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Refers to sensitivity to price, extent to which changes in unit price influence consumption of the commodity

A

Elasticity of demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Changes in price produce less than proportional changes in consumption

A

Inelastic demand

17
Q

Changes in price produce larger than proportional changes in consumption

A

Elastic demand

18
Q

What influences Elasticity of Demand?

A

Constraints on income
Open versus closed economies
Nature of available alternatives

19
Q

Consumption of reinforcer not dependent on responding within earning context; supplemental access to reinforcer provided outside of earning context

A

Open economies

20
Q

Consumption of reinforcer entirely dependent on responding within earning context; no supplemental access

A

Closed economies

21
Q

Demand is more elastic when

A

Substitutable reinforcers are concurrently available

22
Q

Reinforcers that share important functional properties

A

Substitutable reinforcers

23
Q

Determinants of Stimulus Value

A

Contingency
Accumulation and Continuity
Variation and Choice

24
Q

The amount of work the person has to complete to earn reinforcer influence the subsequent effectiveness of that reinforcer

25
Reinforcers need not be consumed following each completion of a schedule requirement but rather can be accumulated then collected and consumed later
Accumulation
26
Reasons for accumulating reinforcers
Does not interrupt ongoing behavior | Requires fewer teacher resources
27
Procedures that interrupt continuity might alter the quality of the reinforcer, thus discounting its effectiveness
Continuity
28
Delivery of a brief period of access each time a small response requirement is met
Distributed reinforcement
29
Delivery of all reinforcement at the same time following the completion of a larger response requirement
Accumulated reinforcement
30
Conclusion about accumulation
Accumulated access mediated through tokens support: Faster work Greater overall quantity of work Preferred by learner
31
What promotes accumulation
Consumption cost Interest for savings Nature of reinforcer and continuity
32
Arranges for rotation of different reinforcers following responding
Stimulus Variation
33
Findings about stimulus variation
Increase response rate and decrease IRT | Preferred even if varied reinforcers are of lesser preference but still moderately preferred
34
Types of Choice
Pre-session selection | Within-session selection
35
Pre-session selection
Ask which reinforcer they would like to earn in the following instructional session
36
Within-session selection
Permit learner to choose from a small array of reinforcers each time the schedule requirement is met
37
Potential reasons why "reinforcement" may not work
1. Contrived external contingencies where contingencies were not needed. 2. Procedural mismatches between response and its outcome
38
Types of procedural mismatches
1. The stimulus used was not a reinforcer 2. The stimulus was not a reinforcer under specific conditions in which it was arranged 3. The stimulus was no longer a reinforcer under these conditions 4. A response-reinforcer contingency was arranged but was not contacted 5. The stimulus followed the wrong response
39
Decrease in responding may result from
1. Overjustification 2. Punishment: Time out from preferred activity 3. Discriminative properties of of reinforcers: Reinforcer evokes incompatible behavior