Agreeableness and conscientiousness Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

low scorers conscientiousness

A

late, change plans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

high scorers conscientiousness

A

stick to routine, self-discipline, punctual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

high scorers for A

A

Attend to needs of
others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

low scorers for A

A

Fight with others,
don’t care what
others think

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

examples of A and C as one dimension

A

Eysenck’s psychoticism
Tellegen’s constraint
association with ASPD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A and C related to antisocial behaviour

A

c- you think deliberately
a - you attend to the suffering of others
danger occurs when both are low

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how did Dam et al measure trait agression

A

259 men across a broad continuum of trait aggression’
Personality inventory and agression questionnaire
low in A and C and high in neuroticism - high risk of exhibiting aggressive behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

correlates of A and C

A

addictions predicted by c but not a
high a predicts harmonious relationships and social support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

correlates of c but not a

A

-job performance
-academic performance
-physical health and life expectancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how did Piedmont et al investigate athletic performance

A

athletes complete five factor measure
coaches rated several performance dimensions and stats collected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Piedmont et al findings

A

neuroticism and C explained 23% of variance in coaches’ ratings
c sole predictor of game stats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

benefits of increasing conscientiousness

A

attention to long term fitness, life expectancy and social qualities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

costs of increasing c

A

missing of immediate fitness gains, obsessionality, rigidity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

correlates of c

A

healthy behaviours
increased life expectancy
strict moral principles
perfectionism
adherence to rules
fewer short term mating episodes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

correlates of a

A

harmonious relationships
tom
avoiding conflict
excessive attention to others needs
excessive trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

benefits on increasing a

A

attention to mental states of others
harmonious relationships
valued partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

costs of increasing a

A

subject to social cheating
failure to maximise selfish advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Asahi response inhibition

A

Go/No go task and fMRI
areas of right frontal cortex more active on no go trials than go trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Asahi et al correlational findings

A

stronger response in the right DLPFC during the no go trials, the less impulsive people self rated themselves

20
Q

why may low c be equivelated to impulsivity

A

lack of perserverance
lack of premeditation
urgency
sensation seeking

21
Q

DeYoung findings for neurobiological mechanism of C

A

covaried with volume in lateral prefrontal cortex - region in planning and control of behaviour

22
Q

evidence for c as its own mechanism

A

DLPFC is most often associated with working memory
working memory relates to IQ
both are unrelated to C

23
Q

how may multicomponent behaviours relate to C

A

occur when people need to interrupt and chain different mechanisms to achieve a task goal

24
Q

two strategies to approach multicomponent behaviours

A

parallel strategy - process two actions at once
serial strategy - process actions in a step-by-step fashion

25
best strategy for multi-component behaviour
step-by-step - overlapping strategy results in prolonged response times
26
what is required for step-by-step processing
top down behavioural control of a person's actions
27
c and multicomponent behaviour
being able to flexibly adjust the priority if multiple response steps - may be related to resisting distractions found to be selectively affected by c
28
Rueter et al investivagation into C and the goal priority network
functional connectivity analysis in fMRI synchrony with components that overlapped with goal priority network was significantly associated with c
29
regions of the goal priority network
anterior insula dorsal anterior cingulate cortex dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
30
what is the main psych mechanism for a
TOM (mentalisation of others)
31
correlates of a
positively correlated with social competence and cooperativeness negatively correlated with aggressive tendencies
32
how is TOM measured
false-belief tasks
33
how is perceptual TOM measured
reading mind in the eyes task
34
how is cognitive TOM measured
persepctive taking and memory capacity tasks
35
findings of a and TOM (Nettle and Liddle)
good correlation between A and social-cognitive TOM no correlation between A and reading mind in the eyes
36
how may maniputlation and TOM be related
ability to effectively lie with more advanced TOM TOM training can induce lying in previously honest preschoolers
37
how was a and social cognitive ability investigated
displays of triangles of random movement vs human-like movement slef reports of a
38
findings of social cognitive ability and a
default network system was greater for social vs random animations -predicted better performance on social cognition tasks and higher a
39
what is the difference between affective and cognitive empathy
affective = empathetically share other's affects cognitive = perspective taking - understanding others goals and motives
40
explain the qualitative appraisal of empathy
1. notice another's feelings 2. correctly interperting another's feelings 3. finding empathy
41
what is the difference between empathy and compassion
emapthy = self-related emotions often related to negative emotions compassion = other-related emotion and linked to positive emotions e.g. prosocial behaviours
42
brain areas for empathy
insula and anterior cingulate cortex
43
brain areas for compassion
reward systems - OFC and striatum
44
evidence of TOM and empathy as independent
- TOM impairments for autistic individuals but empathy preserved - aggresive criminals show empathy deficits without TOM deficits
45
Winter et al - TOM/EMPATHY investigation
social video task agressive patients showed reduced empathetic responses to emotional videos
46
neural correlates for compassionn
overlapping activation for empathy and compassion unique activity in ventral striatum for compassion but not empathy