Agreeableness and conscientiousness Flashcards
(46 cards)
low scorers conscientiousness
late, change plans
high scorers conscientiousness
stick to routine, self-discipline, punctual
high scorers for A
Attend to needs of
others
low scorers for A
Fight with others,
don’t care what
others think
examples of A and C as one dimension
Eysenck’s psychoticism
Tellegen’s constraint
association with ASPD
A and C related to antisocial behaviour
c- you think deliberately
a - you attend to the suffering of others
danger occurs when both are low
how did Dam et al measure trait agression
259 men across a broad continuum of trait aggression’
Personality inventory and agression questionnaire
low in A and C and high in neuroticism - high risk of exhibiting aggressive behaviour
correlates of A and C
addictions predicted by c but not a
high a predicts harmonious relationships and social support
correlates of c but not a
-job performance
-academic performance
-physical health and life expectancy
how did Piedmont et al investigate athletic performance
athletes complete five factor measure
coaches rated several performance dimensions and stats collected
Piedmont et al findings
neuroticism and C explained 23% of variance in coaches’ ratings
c sole predictor of game stats
benefits of increasing conscientiousness
attention to long term fitness, life expectancy and social qualities
costs of increasing c
missing of immediate fitness gains, obsessionality, rigidity
correlates of c
healthy behaviours
increased life expectancy
strict moral principles
perfectionism
adherence to rules
fewer short term mating episodes
correlates of a
harmonious relationships
tom
avoiding conflict
excessive attention to others needs
excessive trust
benefits on increasing a
attention to mental states of others
harmonious relationships
valued partners
costs of increasing a
subject to social cheating
failure to maximise selfish advantage
Asahi response inhibition
Go/No go task and fMRI
areas of right frontal cortex more active on no go trials than go trials
Asahi et al correlational findings
stronger response in the right DLPFC during the no go trials, the less impulsive people self rated themselves
why may low c be equivelated to impulsivity
lack of perserverance
lack of premeditation
urgency
sensation seeking
DeYoung findings for neurobiological mechanism of C
covaried with volume in lateral prefrontal cortex - region in planning and control of behaviour
evidence for c as its own mechanism
DLPFC is most often associated with working memory
working memory relates to IQ
both are unrelated to C
how may multicomponent behaviours relate to C
occur when people need to interrupt and chain different mechanisms to achieve a task goal
two strategies to approach multicomponent behaviours
parallel strategy - process two actions at once
serial strategy - process actions in a step-by-step fashion