AP Lang Rhetorical Handbook Full Flashcards
(110 cards)
allusion
indirect or passing reference to some event, person, place, or artistic work, the nature and relevance of which is not explained but relies on the reader’s familiarity with what is thus mentioned
ambiguity
something of doubtful meaning; an expression whose meaning cannot be determined from its context, may have more than one meaning
anachronism
representation of someone as existing or something as happening in other than chronological, proper, or historical order
aphorism
brief statement which expresses an observation on life, usually intended as a wise observation
invective
abuse (tongue-lashing, diatribe, condemnation)
juxtaposition
placing two things side by side, usually to show contrast
malapropism
an incorrect usage of a ward, usually with comic effect
rhetorical question
a question posed by the speaker or writer not to seek an answer but instead to affirm or deny a point simply by asking a question about it
sensory detail
an item used to appeal to the sense (sight, taste, touch, etc)
shift
general term in linguistics for any slight alteration in a word’s meaning, or the creation of an entirely new word by changing the use of an expression
tone
writer’s attitude toward his reader and his subject; his mood or moral view; formal, informal, playful, ironic, optimistic, pessimistic
point of view
way the events of a story are conveyed to the reader; “vantage point” from which the narrative is passed from author to the reader; first-person, omniscient, limited
theme-thesis
message conveyed by a literary work
voice
textual feature, such as diction and sentence structure, that convey a writer’s or speaker’s persona
ad hominem argument
an attack on another person instead of their point of view
begging the question
situation that results when a writer or speaker constructs an argument on an assumption that the audience does not accept
doubtful authority
the authority os not an expert, their colleagues disagree, or the reference to the authority is out of context of the situation
either/or reasoning
argument that something complex can be looked at in only two different ways
false analogy
comparing two things that are irrelevant, do not pose a valid comparison
hasty generalization
not enough support for the inductive reasoning used
circular argument
restates the argument rather than actually proving it
slippery slope
conclusion based on the premise that if A happens, then eventually, through a series of small steps, B, C,…, X, Y, Z will happen too, basically equating A and Z; so if we don;t want Z to occur A must not occur
non-sequitur
conclusion that had no visible connection to the support for the claim
oversimplification
reducing an idea too much so it loses the point trying to be made