Arrests, Searches & Seizures Flashcards

Learn all about 4th Amendment searches and seizures, including: - Arrests - Warrants & probable cause - Searches and seizures - Terry stops - Exceptions to the warrant requirement - Exclusionary rule & fruit of the poisonous tree - Administrative searches

1
Q

The 4th Amendment has 2 major parts, it:

  1. Protects the right of the people to be secure from ______ and _______; and
  2. States that warrants must be supported by _______.
A

The 4th Amendment:

  1. Protects people to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures in their home by the government; and
  2. States that warrants must be supported by probable cause

More Info: 4th Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are 4 key questions you should ask when approaching a 4th Amendment question?

A
  1. Was there a search or seizure?
    • Was the search or seizure conducted by a government actor?
  2. Was there probable cause?
  3. Was there a valid warrant? (Was the warrant defective or did the police act in bad faith?)
  4. Was there an exception to the warrant requirement?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When will actions by a private individual trigger the 4th Amendment?

A

If the individual acted at the direction of a government agent or pursuant to an official policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What constitutes a seizure under the 4th Amendment?

A

When an officer, by show of physical force or authority, intentionally restrains the liberty of the citizen so that they are not free to leave (objective standard).

In this context, a seizure is also called an arrest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What factors help determine if a seizure has occured?

A

Basic Rule: If a reasonable person in D’s position would have believed he was not free to leave, it’s a seizure.

Factors include:

  • Threatening presence of several officers;
  • Display of weapons;
  • Physical touching of person; and
  • Indication that compliance with request is an order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is required for a valid arrest?

A
  1. Probable cause; and
  2. Warrant if:
    • Suspect is in their own home or another’s home absent consent or exigent circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When is an arrest warrant NOT required?

A

If:

  • Arrest is in a public place;
  • Arrest is for a misdemeanor punishable by a fine and police witnessed the misdemeanor;
  • Exigent circumstances exist; or
  • Police had consent to enter D’s home or third party’s home
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does an illegal arrest prevent the government from prosecuting D?

A

No, as long as police have probable cause, they may prosecute and detain D even if the arrest was illegal.

⚠️ However, evidence seized during an illegal arrest may be suppressed at trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When can the police stop an automobile?

A

Must have reasonable suspicion of illegal activity, unless the stop is at a checkpoint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When can a private citizen make an arrest (“citizen’s arrest”)?

A

If:

  1. A felony has been committed; and
  2. Citizen has reasonable belief that the person being arrested committed it

⚠️ Note: Can be used as a defense if citizen used reasonable force to detain until police arrived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the two-prong test identified in Katz to determine whether or not there was a search?

A
  1. Did the defendant have a reasonable expectation of privacy?; and
  2. Was the expectation one that society recognizes as reasonable?

If yes, the search is protected by the 4th Amendment.

See Katz v. United States

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When does a reasonable expectation of privacy exist under the 4th Amendment?

A

When:

  1. An individual has a subjective expectation of privacy in the thing searched; and
  2. Expectation is one society recognizes as reasonable

⭐️ Viewed in totality of the circumstances

Katz v. United States

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List examples of when there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

A
  1. Objects knowingly exposed to the public;
  2. Smells emanating from personal belongings;
  3. Car VIN #’s;
  4. Handwriting samples;
  5. Voice exemplars;
  6. DNA samples;
  7. Bank records;
  8. Phone call records;
  9. Conversations with government informants;
  10. Open fields;
  11. Airspace above property higher than 400 feet
  12. Naked-eye observations of private property; and
  13. Discarded property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is considered one’s home for the purposes of the 4th Amendment?

A
  1. Home/dwelling itself; and
  2. Curtilage (area surrounding the home). Whether or not area is curtilage depends on:
    • Proximity of the area to the home;
    • Whether the area is within an enclosure surrounding the home;
    • The nature and uses to which the area is put; and
    • Steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by passersby
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are open fields surrounding the home considered curtilage?

A

No, even if the area is fenced and has “No Trespassing” signs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does an overnight guest in someone’s home have a reasonable expectation of privacy?

A

Yes, as long as the premises aren’t being used for an illegal purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Does an overnight guest in a hotel have a reasonable expectation of privacy?

A

Yes. A hotel clerk cannot consent to the search.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the Third Party Doctrine and its effect?

A

An individual who freely shares information with a third-party (e.g. banks, phone companies, or internet service providers) has no reasonable expectation of privacy for that information

⚠️ Exception: Cell Phone Tracking Data (Carpenter v. United States)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Does aerial surveillance of D’s property with a plane or helicopter constitute a search?

A

If the surveillance is at a height greater than 400 feet, D likely has no reasonable expectation of privacy and thus no search occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Does placing a tracker on D’s vehicle or other private property constitute a search?

A

Yes, if police physically intruded on D’s property to install the tracker.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Does using animals (e.g. drug-sniffing dogs) to search for contraband constitute a search?

A

Yes, if it intrudes upon a constitutionally protected area (i.e. home, curtilage, person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the requirements for a valid warrant?

A

Warrant must be:

  1. Based on probable cause;
    • Supported by oath or affidavit
  2. Describe with particularity the thing/person to be seized and place to be searched; and
  3. Be issued by a neutral and detached magistrate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

The scope of a warrant is limited to:

A

Only the premises, person, or items described in the warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Are warrants needed for each person to be searched?

A

Yes, there must be an independent basis to search each person; just because they are in the same room doesn’t mean the search is valid (absent exigent circumstances).

⚠️ Note: Police can detain subjects not included in the warrant, but they cannot search them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are 8 exceptions to the warrant requirement?

A

Common Acronym = ESCAPIST

  1. Exigent circumstances;
  2. Searches incident to lawful arrest;
  3. Consent;
  4. Automobile search
  5. Plain view search;
  6. Inventory search;
  7. Special needs;
  8. Terry stop and frisk;

⭐️ The MBE likes you to trick you on these. Memorize these exceptions!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

When does probable cause exist?

A

If the quantity of facts and circumstances would lead a reasonable person to conclude that either:

  1. The individual in question has committed a crime; or
  2. Specific items related to criminal activity can be found at that particular location

More info: Probable Cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Probable cause must be supported by what type of facts?

A

Facts based on either:

  1. Verifiable and reliable information from an informant;
  2. Seized evidence; or
  3. Observations by law enforcement (police are presumed to be reliable sources)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

When is an informant tip considered sufficiently reliable to establish probable cause?

A

Courts weigh:

  1. The credibility of the information;
  2. The reliability of the informant;
  3. Corroboration by the police; and
  4. An informant’s declaration against interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is the remedy if police act pursuant to an invalid warrant?

A

Evidence obtained during an unlawful search will be inadmissible pursuant to the Exclusionary Rule.

⚠️ Exception: Evidence is not excluded if police officers relied upon the warrant in good-faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

When does the good-faith exception to the Exclusionary Rule not apply?

A

If either:

  1. No reasonable officer would have relied upon the warrant;
  2. The warrant is facially defective;
  3. The officer lied or misled the magistrate to obtain the warrant;
  4. The magistrate issuing the warrant was not neutral and unattached; or
  5. The warrant was improperly executed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Who can execute a warrant and within what time frame?

A

Only the police may execute a warrant. Must be executed promptly while probable cause still exists.

32
Q

What is the “knock and announce” rule?

A

Absent exigent circumstances, the police must knock and announce their identity before entering a home to execute a warrant

33
Q

When are police not required to “knock and announce”?

A

When police have reasonable suspicion that doing so will:

  1. Endanger officers;
  2. Lead to the destruction of evidence; or
  3. Lead to flight of the suspect
34
Q

If police violate the “knock and announce” rule, what happens to evidence discovered during the search?

A

Still admissible. Exclusionary Rule does not apply.

35
Q

What is the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement?

A

Police may search without a warrant if waiting to obtain a warrant will result in imminent:

  1. **Destruction of evidence;
  2. Escape of the accused; or
  3. Danger to police or others in the area

More Info: Exigent Circumstances

⚠️ Note: Not applicable if police create the exigent circumstances so they can bypass the warrant requirement

36
Q

What are police allowed to do when in hot pursuit?

A

If the suspect is a felon, the police may:

  1. Enter and search a private dwelling;
  2. Conduct a warrantless arrest of the suspect on the premises; and
  3. Seize any contraband in plain view

⚠️ Lange v. California (2021) held that a fleeing misdemeanor suspect does not automatically create an exigent circumstance. It is unclear whether the MBE will test this case, but be prepared.

37
Q

Can police perform warrantless blood tests on drunk drivers?

A

Yes, only under the exigent circumstances exception if:

  1. BAC evidence is dissipating (“literally disappearing by the minute”) and;
  2. Some other factor creates pressing health, safety, or law enforcement needs that would take priority over a warrant application

⚠️Note: This is used in extremely narrow circumstances; the driver essentially needs to be unconscious/physically incapable of a breath test. See Mitchell v. Wisconsin (2019)

38
Q

What is a Terry Stop (also known as a “stop and frisk”)?

A

A brief investigatory seizure by the police when there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.

More Info: Terry Stop

⚠️Note: Terry Stops are not arrests, but rather a brief detainment by the police. As such, probable cause is not required, only reasonable suspicion (lower bar). However, if the officer’s suspicion is confirmed, it may turn into probable cause to arrest.

39
Q

Define

reasonable suspicion

A

Reasonable belief based upon articulable information (more than a mere hunch) that the suspect has or is about to engage in illegal or criminal activity

40
Q

What is the permissible duration of a Terry Stop?

A

Time necessary to confirm or deny the police officer’s suspicion

41
Q

When is a police officer allowed to “frisk” a suspect?

A

If they have reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed and dangerous, the officer can conduct a limited search of the suspect

42
Q

What is the scope of a “frisk”?

A

Police are only allowed to do a quick pat-down of the suspect’s outer clothing for weapons. Cannot manipulate items.

43
Q

What is the “plain feel” exception to a Terry Stop?

A

If, during the course of the frisk, the police have probable cause to believe the suspect has a weapon or contraband (e.g. they feel a gun), they may seize the weapon

44
Q

What is the “Plain-view” doctrine?

A

A warrant is not required to seize an item if:

  1. The police are on the premises lawfully when they observe the item; and
  2. The incriminating nature of the item is immediately apparent (police may not move objects to get a better view)
45
Q

Do smells fall under the “Plain-view” doctrine?

A

Yes, if police have probable cause to believe the smell is from contraband, they can search the item where the odor is coming from

46
Q

What is a search incident to lawful arrest (“SILA”)?

A

Warrantless search of an arrestee and the area within their immediate control (wingspan, lunging area) during a lawful arrest

47
Q

If police have a reasonable suspicion that accomplices may be in the home, what actions can they take?

A

The police can conduct a cursory protective sweep of spaces where people may hide (closets, under the bed, etc)

48
Q

What is the duration of a search incident to lawful arrest?

A

Contemporaneous with or immediately after the arrest

49
Q

Pursuant to a search incident to lawful arrest, can police search pockets and containers?

A

Yes, as long as they are within the suspect’s reach and large enough to hold contraband or weapons

50
Q

Pursuant to a search incident to lawful arrest, can police search the arrestee’s vehicle?

A

Yes, if:

  1. Arrestee has access to the vehicle compartments;
  2. There is a reasonable belief arrestee may destroy evidence or pose a danger to the officers; and
  3. There is reasonable belief that the vehicle contains evidence of a crime
51
Q

What is an inventory search?

A

Constitutional, warrantless search of an arrestee’s belongings once they are jailed

52
Q

What is the automobile exception to the warrant requirement?

A

Police may search an automobile and persons within it without a warrant as long as they have probable cause.

Police can search any locked containers in the vehicle and the trunk if the areas could reasonably hold the evidence sought (i.e. have probable cause to do so)

Also applies to motor homes, boats, and airplanes.

53
Q

Does the automobile exception apply to parked or immobile vehicles?

A

No, because the danger of the evidence being removed is significantly diminished

54
Q

Which types of checkpoints are permissible?

A
  1. Sobriety checkpoints;
  2. Checkpoints at or near the border; and
  3. Checkpoints to obtain information about a recent crime

⚠️ Checkpoints to test for drugs are not valid

55
Q

If a checkpoint is to obtain information about a crime, what requirements must it follow?

A
  1. Checkpoint’s primary purpose is help law enforcement investigate a crime and advance a public concern;
  2. The cars are stopped in a neutral manner; and
  3. Checkpoint minimally interferes with 4th Amendment rights
56
Q

Are border searches allowed?

A

Yes, officials may search anyone at or near the border (including international airports and ports) in a routine manner without a warrant, or probable cause, or reasonable suspicion

57
Q

What is the consent exception to the warrant requirement?

A

If a person voluntarily consents to a search, no warrant or probable cause is needed.

Whether or not a person has consented is determined in light of the totality of the circumstances.

58
Q

What constitutes invalid consent for a warrantless search?

A

Consent that was gained by:

  1. Asserting a fake warrant; or
  2. An unlawful police threat (a threat to do something that the officer has no authority to do)
59
Q

Are the police required to inform someone of their ability to refuse consent?

A

No

60
Q

If a person has consented to a search, who determines the scope of the search?

A

The person who consented to the search. Exceeding the scope will make the entire search invalid.

61
Q

Who has authority to consent to a search?

A

Any person who has joint control or use of shared premises (e.g. roommate, spouse)

62
Q

Does a third party have authority to consent to a search?

A

Yes, if:

  1. The third party owns or occupies the home; or
  2. The third party and D jointly own or occupy the home and D is not present (valid even if D had previously objected at another time)

⚠️ Note: If D is home and objects to the third party giving consent, the third party consent is not valid

63
Q

Can a landlord give consent to search a tenant’s residence?

A

No

64
Q

Can an employer give consent to search an employee’s private storage area?

A

No

65
Q

Define

administrative search

A

Search carried out by regulatory bodies to enforce compliance with administrative regulations and/or health and safety codes

66
Q

When is an administrative warrant required for an administrative search?

A

Generally required for administrative fire, health, or safety inspections of residential or private commercial property.

67
Q

What is needed for an administrative warrant to be issued?

A

Either:

  1. Probable cause that an administrative violation has occured; or
  2. Evidence that establishment has been selected to be inspected

⚠️ Note: Probable cause standard is less stringent than for criminal investigations

68
Q

Can the police open international mail?

A

Yes, as long as the police have probable cause to do so

69
Q

Is criminal evidence found during an administrative search admissible?

A

Yes, as long as the search was executed pursuant to a warrant, or the search was a valid, warrantless search

70
Q

When are searches of public school students allowed?

A
  1. Police have a moderate chance of finding contraband (lower bar than probable cause);
  2. Search methods are reasonably related to the purpose of the search; and
  3. Search is not excessively intrusive
71
Q

Define

Exclusionary Rule

A

Holds that evidence obtained in violation of D’s 4th, 5th, or 6th Amendment rights is inadmissible at criminal trials to prove D’s guilt

72
Q

The exclusionary rule does not apply to which type of proceedings?

A
  • Grand jury proceedings;
  • Civil proceedings;
  • Administrative proceedings; and
  • Sentencing, bail, and parole hearings
73
Q

What are the exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule?

A

Evidence may still be admissible if it falls underneath these exceptions:

  1. Independent source: Evidence is discovered by an independent source;
  2. Attenutation: Relationship between the primary taint and discovery of evidence is sufficiently attenuated as to break the causal chain;
  3. Inevitable discovery: Evidence would have been inevitably discovered through legal means
  4. Good faith: Exists when police officers were acting in good faith on a warrant that was later declared invalid (see more: Good Faith Exception)
  5. Impeachment: Illegally obtained evidence may be used to impeach D at trial
74
Q

Define

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine

A

Holds that any evidence obtained from an illegal search is tainted and thus subject to the exclusionary rule unless an exception applies.

75
Q

Is physical evidence seized as the result of an illegal confession (i.e. one in violation of Miranda) admissible?

A

Yes, physical evidence obtained from a confession that violated Miranda is **still admissible **at trial.

Ex. During an illegal interrogation, D tells police that a gun is hidden under the bed. The gun is still admissible at trial.

76
Q

What are wiretaps?

A

Monitoring of electronic communications; require a warrant (except for certain national security purposes)

77
Q

What are the warrant requirements for a wiretap?

A

The warrant must:

  1. Demonstrate probable cause;
  2. Name the person going to be wiretapped;
  3. Contain specific details about the conversations that will be overheard;
  4. Explain how the wiretap will be terminated; and
  5. Be limited to a brief period of time