Attachment Flashcards
What is attachment
A close emotional relationship between an infant and their caregiver. A strong emotional bond
Features of caregiver-infant interaction
Sensitive responsiveness- caregiver responds to signals from infant
Imitation- Infant copies the caregiver’s actions and behaviour
Interactional synchrony- infants react in time with caregivers speech
Reciprocity- interaction flows back and forth between infant/caregiver
Motherese- the slow, high pitched way of speaking to infants
The stages of attachment
The asocial stage (0-6 weeks), Indiscriminate attachments (6weeks-6months), Specific attachments (7months onwards), multiple attachments (10/11 months onwards)
The Asocial Stage (or pre-attachment)
First few weeks of life, and they tend to make bonds and recognise their carers. Behaviour is similar to human and inanimate things like a teddy bear. Babies are happier in the presence of a familiar human, traditionally mum.
Indiscriminate Attachment Stage (or diffuse)
Prefer humans to non-human objects. Observable social behaviours and they’ll accept cuddles from any adult, no signs of separation or stranger anxiety.
Specific attachments Stage (or discriminate/single)
Stranger and separation anxiety is in this stage, separation normally from mother
Multiple attachments stage
Forming multiple attachments with people they spend a lot of time with
Schaffer and Emerson (1964)
60 babies were observed in their homes in Glasgow every four weeks from birth to about 18months and interviews were conducted with families. The stages of attachment were found to occur, by the end 50 had multiple attachments and 20 had no or a weaker attachment towards their mother. Found that quality of care is important as the infant may not attach to mother if other people response more accurately to signals. They used a limited sample and evidence from interviews may be biased and unreliable, also cultural differences
The role of the father
Studies have shown that if the father partakes in care-giving activities, they are much more likely to have a secure strong attachment with their child. Geiger(1996) suggested that the roles of father and mother can be different as they found that a mother is primarily for nurturing and caring but a father is more focused around play.
Konrad Lorenz (1935)
Found that geese automatically ‘attach’ to the first moving thing they see after hatching, and follow it everywhere. This is called imprinting. He randomly divided a clutch of greylag goose eggs into two groups, he left one group with the mother and incubated the others. These goslings followed him around in the exact same way the others followed their mother
Harlow (1959)
Harlow aimed to find whether monkeys prefer a source of food or a source of comfort and protection as an attachment figure. One mother was wire mesh with a feeding bottle the other made of cloth without any food. Monkey spent most of time clinging to the cloth surrogate and only used wired one to feed. Cloth surrogate gave them comfort in new situations, monkeys showed signs of emotional and social disturbance once grown. Infant monkeys formed a better attachment in comfort and growing up in isolation affected their development. Ethical problems
Pros and Cons of animal studies
Some research designs couldn’t have been conducted on humans ethically at all. However some see it as unethical to inflict suffering on animals, especially when they cannot provide consent
Learning Theory
Focuses on the baby wanting it’s needs fulfilled. Attachments form through conditioning. Use classical conditioning to learn associations between different things in our environment. Getting food naturally brings pleasure and the desire is fulfilled with mother to feed it so an association and attachment is formed with mother and food. Operant conditioning shows babies to feel discomfort when hungry so they find if they cry, their mother will remove the discomfort by feeding them, negative reinforcement, mother is then associated with food and baby wants to be close to her.
Pros and Cons of learning theory
Lots of support and scientific research, but it’s reductionist as complex attachment is explained simply, lots of evidence is from animal studies so not always generalisable
Monotropic Theory of attachment (internal working model)
We have evolved a biological need to attach to our main caregiver. This biological need has developed through natural selection to ensure survival of the child to maturity. Bowlby’s suggests we form one main attachment- usually to our biological mother as a survival value for food and protection. Also says forming infant attachment gives us a ‘template’ for all future relationships. The primary care giver provides the foundations for this - called the continuity hypothesis. The first 3 years of life are the critical period for attachment to develop or it may never
Secure (Type B) Attachments
Strong bond between the child and its caregiver. If separated, the infant becomes distressed, however when reunited the child is easily comforted by the caregiver. Associated with health cognitive and emotional development
Insecure-avoidant (Type A) attachment
If separated from caregiver, the child doesn’t become particularly distressed, and can usually be comforted by a stranger, shown by children who generally avoid social interaction and intimacy with others
Insecure-resistant (Type C) attachment
Child is often uneasy around their caregiver, but becomes upset if they’re separated. Comfort can’t be given by strangers, also often resisted from caregivers. Children who show this style both accept and reject social interaction and intimacy
Ainsworth’s Strange Situation (1987)
Controlled observation, 12-18 month old infants left in a room with their mother. Eight different scenarios occurred, like a stranger approaching, infant being left alone, mother returning and infants reactions constantly observed. The infants showing different reactions could all be categorised into the 3 attachment types. Controlled variables so reliable results, but the laboratory type situation made it artificial, reducing ecological validity, possible demand characteristics from parents, mother may not have been child’s main attachment figure.
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1998) — Cross-cultural studies
Carried out a meta-analysis of 32 studies of the ‘strange situation’ in different countries. They were analysed to find any overall patterns. Found there was cross-cultural similarities in raising children, with common reactions to the ‘strange situation’. There were more differences within the actual countries than between them. Meta analysis can hide individual results that show an unusual trend. No ethical issues.
Important findings from Strange Situation Research
Some cultural differences are find: for example Germany have more avoidant infants as German values put on independence so ‘avoidant’ is seen as good. The causes of different attachment types are debatable. The experiment doesn’t show the characteristic of the child. Attachment type may influence later behaviours
How can attachment be disrupted
Separation- child is away from attached caregiver, relatively short time
Deprivation- loss of something wanted or needed, loss of caregiver, long-term permanent separation
Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation (1953)
Deprivation from main carer during critical period (first 3years) will have harmful effects on a child’s emotional, social, intellectual and even physical development. Long-term effects may include separation anxiety and future relationships may be affected by this emotional insecurity
Robertson and Robertson (1968)- A separation study
Natural observation. Several children who experienced short separations from carers were observed and filmed, they had an infant stay in a residential nursery for 9 days without their mother, they showed signs of detachment and was reluctant to be affectionate when mother returned. Short-term separation had very bad effects including possible permanent damage to his attachment with his mother. The reaction may be due to less attention rather than separation, little control of variables, difficult replication, high ecological validity, considerably unethical