attending and spatial brain Flashcards

1
Q

location on the retina

A

retinocentric space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

location of object relative to body

A

egocentric space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

location of object relative to eathother

A

allocentric space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cross-modal perception

A
  • integrate info from different senses - using attention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

attention

A

process by which certain information is selected for further processing and other info is discarded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

attention selection based on

A
  • relevance

- importance to current goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

attention spotlight metaphor

A

spotlight moves from location to location and zooms in and out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

location of attention is the same as fixation - true or false

A

false - can look out corner of eye

though it is a natural tendency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

externally guided by a stimulus

A

exogenous control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

externally guided by a stimulus

A

exogenous control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

inhibition of return

A

slowing of speed of processing when going back to previously attended location

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Posner (1980) - exogenous control

A

Ps had to press button when saw red target - every now and then given spatial cue
if cue was within 150s of target - faster at detecting target
if cue was after 150s - slower as if wait fro target attention is deployed to other areas - inhibition of return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

internally guided by a stimulus

A

endogenous control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

visual search

A

endogenous control

scanning environment for something you are looking for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mitroff and Biggs (2013) - airport scanner game

A
  • when forbidden items rare - bad at finding them
  • when forbidden items common - better
    some people good when rare - should be hired for this job - interview process?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

flat efficient / parallel search

A

when 1 feature different
find immediately
does matter on number of items or display size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

steep inefficient / serial search

A

when 2 features different
have to scan more
depends upon distractors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

feature integration theory (FIT)

A

if object has unique perceptual feature - pops out
- detected without attention

if object shares perceptual features - attention is needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

where pathway

A

dorsal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what pathway

21
Q

2 attention related networks

A
  • dorso-dorsal network

- ventro-dorsal stream

22
Q

dorso-dorsal network

A

internal deployment of attention

  • lateral parietal areas
    superior parietal globule and frontal eye fields
23
Q

ventro-dorsal stream

A

external deployment of attention

temporal parietal junction (right side) and ventral frontal cortex

24
Q

pseudo neglect

A

tendency to neglect the RIGHT side

right parietal lobe = richer representation of space (left and some right)
left parietal lobe = impoverished representation of space (mostly right)

25
what is neglect
when patients fail to be aware of one side of space
26
other names for neglect
unilateral neglect spatial neglect hemispatial neglect
27
when is neglect most prominent
following damage to right hemisphere | - as richer representation of space
28
neuroanatomy of neglect
parietal (right/frontal) lobe | mort et al (2003) - lesion overlap study - common damage in right angular gyrus
29
is neglect just visual (true/false)
false - can be auditory/somatosensory
30
clinical tests of neglect
- line bisection - cancellation - drawing
31
perceptual vs representational neglect
``` perceptual = cant perceive 1 half of space representation = remember half the scene - memory ```
32
near vs far neglect
near = line bisection with pen and paper impaired far = line bisection on projection on wall impaired BUT - if hold long stick not impaired - extension of body
33
personal vs peripersonal neglect
``` personal = body neglect peripersonal = infront neglect ```
34
within vs between object neglect
within = object-based neglect - neglect half of each object - superior temporal gyrus between = space-based neglect - neglect objects on one half of space - angular gyrus
35
spatial vs object neglect
spatial = axis-based neglect - cant detect differences in left side even when fall in right side
36
does neglect affect low-level perception
no
37
can neglect patients detect object when cued there?
yes | still have active occipital lobes for info not aware of
38
visual extinction
perceptual representation are competing for attention | - when present 2 stimuli presented simultaneously to left and right = left neglected
39
what happens to neglected info?
burning house experiment | - still implicitly code neglected info
40
rehabilitation of neglect techniques
prism glasses - shift entire view to left - if worn over some time can produce long-lasting improvements
41
spatial memory
hippocampus = important in memorising space and navigation | - london taxi cab study
42
where is representation of space stored
parietal lobes
43
Green and Bevelier (2003) - video game
- Ps who played action video game over non-action video game = better at detecting contrast sensitivity better at visual search better at mental rotation
44
brain differences in action videogamers
brain areas involved in attention = fewer activations | as more efficient
45
test used a lot for children with ADHD
TOVA - test of variables of attention
46
what does TOVA measure
impulsivity and sustained attention
47
video gamers and TOVA
significantly faster sustained attention and impulsivity and accuracy was good.
48
video games keeping mental decline at bay
``` anguera et al (2013) - multitasking neuroracer when did 2 tasks at once old Ps - faster WM - TOVA better - multitasking as good at 20 YOs - theta coherence as good as young Ps - posterior areas as well connected to prefrontal areas as young Ps ```