CFA L2 Equity Valuation (Part 2) Flashcards
(144 cards)
Price multiples
Ratios of a stock’s market price to some measure of fundamental value per share. These are commonly used in equity valuation.
Enterprise value multiples
Ratios of the total value of a company to a measure of operating earnings generated (ex: EBITDA)
Momentum indicators
Compare a stock’s price or a company’s earnings to their values in earlier periods.
- Relative strength is generally considered a momentum valuation indicator.
Comparables method to equity valuation
Values a stock based on the average price multiple of the stock of similar companies. This is a form of RELATIVE valuation so we say that a stock is RELATIVELY overvalued or RELATIVELY undervalued compared to a benchmark.
- The economic rationale for the method of comparables is the Law of One Price, which assets that two similar assets should sell at comparable price multiples
Steps to comparables approach
- Select & calculate the multiple being used.
- Select the benchmark and calculate the mean or median of its multiple over a group of comparable stocks.
- Compare #1 to #2
- Examine whether any observed difference between the multiples of the stock and the benchmark are explained by the underlying determinants of the multiple, and make appropriate valuation adjustments.
Method of comparables example:
Firm A’s shares are selling for $50. Earnings for the last 12 months were $2 per share, and the average industry trailing P/E ratio was 32X. Determine whether firm A is overvalued or undervalued using the method of comparables.
Firm A’s trailing P/E ratio = $50 ÷ $2 = 25X.
Firm A’s 25X < industry average 32X → Firm A is RELATIVELY undervalued
Method of forecasted fundamentals
Values a stock based on the ratio of its DCF value to some fundamental variable (ex: EPS).
- The economic rationale is that the value used in the numerator of the justified price multiple is derived from a DCF model: value is equal to the PV of expected FCFs discounted at the appropriate risk-adjusted rate of return.
Method of forecasted fundamentals example:
Firm A’s shares are selling for $30. The average analyst EPS forecast is $4.00. The long-run growth rate is 5%, firm A’s dividend payout ratio is 60%, and the required return is 14%. Calculate the fundamental value of Firm A using the GGM and determine whether Firm A’s shares are over- or undervalued using the method of forecasted fundamentals.
V0 = D1 ÷ (r - g)
V0 = ($4 * .6) ÷ (.14 - .05) = $26.67
Firm A’s MV P/E ratio = ($26.67 ÷ $4)= 6.67X
The observed P/E ratio= ($30 ÷ $4) = 7.5X
Firm A is relatively overvalued
What is a justified price multiple/intrinsic multiple?
What the price multiple should be if the stock is fairly valued.
True or false: If the actual multiple is < than the justified price multiple, the stock is overvalued; if the actual multiple is > than the justified multiple, the stock is undervalued?
False, if the actual multiple is > than the justified price multiple, the stock is overvalued; if the actual multiple is < than the justified multiple, the stock is undervalued
Pros and cons of using P/E ratio in valuation
Pros: P/E ratio is a popular metric. Earnings power is the primary determinent of an investment’s value. Empirical research shows that P/E differences are significantly related to long-run average stock returns. Lastly, the P/E ratio can be used as a proxy for risk & growth.
Cons: Negative earnings makes P/E ratios meaningless. Different accounting practices can make it hard to compare P/E ratios. If earnings are volatile, P/E ratios can become meaningless. Lastly, solely relying on this ratio means that the analyst does not take into account risk, growth, CF, etc.
True or false: Typically, analysts leave noncrecurring items in P/E multiples?
False, typically analysts want to subtract large nonrecurring gains out of earnings (ex: large gain/loss on sale, impairments, loss provisions, etc.) before calculating P/E.
How to adjust EPS to remove cyclical components of earnings and capture mid-cycle or an average of earnings under normal conditions?
There are two methods to normalize earnings:
1. Use average ROE * BVPS of most recent year
2. Use average EPS
How to adjust for negative earnings when calculating P/E?
Using the inverse, earnings yield (E/P). Since price is never negative, there is no issue. A high E/P suggests a cheap security and vice versa.
- A common pitfall of earnings yield is look-ahead bias.
What is the main driver between differences in P/E ratios between companies?
Growth
PEG ratio
Calculates a stock’s P/E ratio per unit of expected growth
Calculation: (P/E) ÷ g
- Lower PEG = more attractive valuation
- Higher PEG= less attractive valuation
- PEG ratio isn’t perfect, it doesn’t take into account risk tolerances or duration of growth. Also, growth and value are not perfectly linear.
P/B ratio
(MVE ÷ BV of equity) OR (market price per share ÷ BV per share) OR [ (ROE - g) ÷ (r - g) ]
- If P/B = 1, the company is earning exactly its required rate of return
- Low P/B = undervalued
- Usually based on trailing BVs
BV of equity
Common shareholders’ equity OR (TA - TL) - PS
Advantages of using P/B ratio
- P/B is a cumulative value, and thus ALMOST ALWAYS positive.
- BV is more stable than EPS
- BV is an appropriate measure of net asset value for firms that primarily hold liquid assets.
- P/B can be useful in valuing companies that are expected to go out of business.
- Empirical research shows that P/B differences are significantly related to long-run average stock returns.
Disadvantages of using P/B ratio
- P/B does not reflect the value of intangible economic assets, such as human capital.
- P/B can be misleading when it comes to asset size. (ex: a firm that oursources a lot of its production will have lower assets and higher P/B)
- Different accounting practices can make it hard to compare firms using P/B.
- Inflation and tech change can cause BV and MV of assets to differ significantly,
What adjustments need to be made to BV when comparing firms using P/B?
Analysts often use tangible BV, which is BV of equity - intangible assets. Firms should also adjust for off b/s assets and liabilities. Lastly, firms using FIFO or LIFO often have to be restated to a consistent method.
True or false: Earnings are more easily manipulated than BV, BV is more easily manipulated than sales, and sales are more easily manipulated than CF?
True
P/S ratio
MVE ÷ total sales OR market price per share ÷ sales per share OR [ (E0 ÷ S0) * (1 - b) * (1 + g) ] ÷ (r - g) OR net margin * trailing P/E
*Usually based on trailing sales
* E0 ÷ S0 = profit margin
* r = required return
* g= sustainable growth rate
* b = dividend payout ratio
* low P/S = undervalued
Advantages of P/S
- Sales revenue is ALWAYS positive.
- Not as easily manipulated as P/B or P/E.
- Sales is less volatile compared to earnings.
- P/S ratios are often used for valuing stocks in mature or cyclical industries and start-up companies w/ no record of earnings. It’s also often used to value investment management companies and partnerships. It’s also used for zero-income stocks.
- Empirical research shows that P/S differences are significantly related to long-run average stock returns.