Ch.9, Independent Groups Flashcards

1
Q

Random Groups Design: t

A

Simplest independent groups design; there are two groups and participants are randomly assigned to one of these two groups/conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Random Assignment:

A

occurs when each participant in the sample has an equal chance of being assigned to each of the two groups; each participant is only assigned to one of the two groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Experimental/Treatment Group:

A

group that receives the intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Control Group:

A

does not receive the intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Advantages of Experiments over Correlation

A

Experiments can begin to make causal statements
Correlation is ideal when you can’t manipulate the IV
“Affect, impact, and cause” can be statements made with experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Statistical Power:

A

a researcher’s ability to find an effect size of interest if it actually exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Null Hypothesis and underpowered studies

A

with underpowered studies (studies that have not used enough participants), it is likely that no group differences will be produced ‘

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Data-Peeking:

A

occurs when researchers run statistical analyses after collecting a smaller subset of their data to get a feel for whether there is already statistically significant results (if they believe they have, they may choose to terminate data collection early, or they may choose to continue the data peeking until they reach p=0.05)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Single-Blind Design:

A

participants don’t know which group they are assigned to (ideal because participants are less likely to have preconceived notions about how the experimenter expects them to behave in the study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Double Blind Design

A

neither the experimenter nor participants know which condition they have been assigned to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Matched Groups

A

Researchers may choose to match their experimental groups on some measure to ensure their groups do not differ drastically (age, socioeconomic class)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Statistical Significance

A

A difference in a group is significant if there is a small likelihood of observing results as more extreme as the current results if the null hypothesis is true
When analysis reaches the p<.05 level, the result is statistically significant
PROVES THAT CONTROL AND TREATMENT GROUPS DIFFER FROM ONE ANOTHER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Practical Significance

A

When something has real world impact, it is practical significance with a high external validity
Practical significance is when the group differences translate to real world and impactful differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Two Independent Group Design

A

Used when a participant could be randomly assigned to one of your groups and not the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Inferential Statistics vs. Descriptive Stats

A

better than descriptive stats because they do not only describe, the allow for prediction over a population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

l

A

l

17
Q

What is the problem with running multiple separate t-tests?

A

The more separate t-tests that are run, the more likely you are to find false positives in data

18
Q

Post-Hoc Analyses:

A

comparisons after the fact that the researcher did not plan on

19
Q

HARKing:

A

Hypothesize after the results are known; problematic when the researchers do not disclose that they came up with their hypothesis after running some data analyses and claim they knew it all along

20
Q

Over-trimming outliers

A

is a p-hacking technique so that data appears more homogenous

21
Q

Golden Rules for Experiments:

A

random assignment to condition, every member of a group should have an equal chance on being assigned to group, MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS IDENTICAL BETWEEN CONDITIONS O

22
Q

Why should groups be matched in smaller sample sizes?

A

Interested in cause but the population of interest is not that big
Deciding which group is experimental or control can no longer be randomied in this case: therefore people need to be matched based on some variable of importance (age/gender) and then split into either experimental or control condition
Need to do this in order to MAKE CAUSAL CLAIMS; IF GROUPS ARE NOT EQUAL IN THIS REGARD THERE IS DECREASED INTERNAL VALIDITY

23
Q

Power Analysis and its purpose

A

done ahead of time so that we know whether a study is underpowered or whether there is just a small effect size (know whether to increase amount of participants)