Mod 4, Research Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

Define the Tuskegee studies.,

A

Tuskegee Studies: study of untreated syphilis, men in Africa were not told that they had syphilis just that they were being treated for “bad blood”; studied by US psychologists; not given penicillin as a treatment because they wanted to see what would happen with untreated syphilis, only 8 survived out of 399

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define the Belmont Report.

A

In response to the Tuskegee studies, the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research began work on ethical research issues
Produced the Belmont Report: made an important distinction between research and practice, which is still very influential today

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define the difference between research and practice.

A

Practice: such as medicine/psychotherapy, involves interventions that are intended for the sole purpose of enhancing the wellbeing of an individual and have a reasonable expectation of success
Research: contributes to general knowledge by testing hypothese

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define the three principles of ethical research.

A

RBJ: respect for persons, beneficence, justice
Respect for Persons: researchers must treat potential participants as autonomous agents, or individuals with the right to make decisions for themselves—as well as provide extra protection for vulnerable populations
Beneficence: researcher should do no harm
Justice: both the benefits and burdens of the research should distribute fairly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define the 1974 Common Rule.

A

Established in 1974
Introduced requirements for informed consent, the ethical conduct of research, and institutional review boards
Revised Common Rule: made revisions to it in 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Revised Common Rule.

A

CHANGED IN THE REVISED COMMON RULE: Benign Interventions: non offensive, non damaging or embarrassing behavioral interventions like surveys, interviews, educational tests and observation of public behavior where there is no expectation of privacy DONT NEED TO FOLLOW COMMON RULE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When do Common Rule Standards?

A

Common rule standards apply whenever data has the potential to be matched to an individuals identity
ABOUT WHO Research questions: must fall under common rule standards because it focuses on the opinions, characteristics, and behavior of individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define the requirements of an institutional review board.

A

Minimum of 5 members
One member must be a non-scientist, one must be unaffiliated with the institution (free to be a whistleblower)
May not review studies where there is a conflict of interest
In addition to IRBS< research is also evaluated by the funding agencies providing money for the research
Power to approve research, disapprove it, require modifications, conduct ongoing reviews, suspend or terminate approval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define research that is exempt from Common Rule Guidelines.

A

research that does not require Common Rule guidelines (researching how many students went to a conference), basic statistical calculations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define a limited review in IRB.

A

method for dealing with newly defined exempt research that doesn’t quite fit the spirit of exempt review (still requires some evaluation as it cannot be fully exempt as it might compromise confidentiality)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DEFINE expedi

A

available for studies that involve minimal risk, which is defined as the same level of risk most of us experience in everyday life (reviewers of an expedited research plan can approve the plan, but they cannot disprove a plan on their own)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define equitable recruitment (Common Rule)

A

Equitable recruitment: researcher should have a representative sample (anyone who could be affected by the research findings should have a chance to participate) COERCIVE INCENTIVES CANNOT BE USED/ ENSURING NO POWER DYNAMICS BETWEEN RESEARCHER/PARTICIPANT, other guidelines for vulnerable populations are codified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Informed Consent (Common Rule)

A

Informed consent: participants must have sufficient knowledge of the study’s details to make a good decision (debriefing form: description of what the researcher plans to tell participants about the deception at the conclusion of their participation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Difference between active and passive consent.

A

ctive (Opt in) Consent: requires a parent or legal guardian’s permission for child to participate
Passive (opt out) consent: all children will participate unless a parent/guardian provides a statement saying they don’t want their child to participate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When can parental consent be waved for research?

A

PARENTAL CONSENT CAN ONLY BE WAIVED when the research involves minimal risk, the rights/welfare of participants will not be affected, the research could not be carried out without a waiver, and the participants receive appropriate debriefing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define the Declaration of Helsinki.

A

Endorsed by WHO
Non-binding influential set of ethical principles emphasizing the precedence of the welfare of the participant over science and law

17
Q

Define the Nuremberg Code.

A

Following WWII, German physicians were charged with crimes against humanity at the “Doctor’s Trials” for conducting brutal medical experiments that involved murders, brutalities, tortures, atrocities
Permissible Medical Experiments: now known as the Nuremberg Code (not adopted by federal standards/professional codes because of its association with the war, but its values are echoed in current ethics legislation)

18
Q

Respect for Dignity of Persons

A

Equitable recruitment: no coercion/incentives
Fair compensation
Confidentiality
No unjust discrimination, no harassment, degrading comments
Informed consent: readability of the consent form, managing deception, debriefing forms, required content

19
Q

Responsible Caring

A

Caring for participants if something negative does happen
Take responsibility
Keep up to date on best practices to avoid causing distress/remedying it

20
Q

Integrity in Relationships (with consumers of research)

A

ntegrity in Relationships (with consumers of research)
No dishonesty, fraud, or misrepresentation in reporting results
Do not suppress disconfirming evidence/ DON’T CONTRIBUTE TO FILE DRAWER PROBLEM

21
Q

Responsibility to Society

A

Contributing to discipline and state of knowledge
Keep informed on what issues society actually cares about
Critical self-evaluation
Educate and promote scientific growth of others
Respect for social customs and cultural expectations before conducting research (if doing research on a population you are not a member of)