Chapter 13 Quasi-Experiments Flashcards
how are quasi-experiments similar to experiments?
has IVs and DVs
main difference between quasi experiments vs experiments
quasi experiments don’t have full experimental control and don’t use random assignment
when are quasi experiments typically used?
in situations where random assignment is unethical (real world situations that can’t be manipulated)
what does the term “nonequivalent” refer to in quasi designs?
no use of random assignment
types of quasi designs
nonequivalent control group posttest only
nonequivalent control group pretest/posttest
nonequivalent control group interrupted time series
2 main characteristics of a nonequivalent control group design
- no use of random assignment; instead participants were either all born with something, exposed to something naturally occurring, etc.
- at least 1 treatment group and 1 comparison group
what comparisons do we want to make in nonequiv posttest only designs?
between-subjects
which threat is heavy in nonequiv posttest only design?
selection threats
nonequivalent pre/post design controls most threats to internal validity except for?
selection effects
when is the DV measured in interrupted time-series design?
repeatedly (before, during (could be several times) and after)
3 pros to interrupted times series design
-results are interpretable
-cam see normal fluctuation and trends
-can see how long lasting an effect is
why is an interrupted time series design better than a 1 group pre/post design?
there’s more data points which makes it easier to interpret
how many groups does an interrupted time-series design have?
2 or more
does the timing of the interruption differ b/w groups in interrupted-time series designs?
yes
which effects are found in quasi-experiments
selection effects; we don’t know if the change in DV is due to the IV or a shared participant characteristic
solutions to eliminating selection fx in quasi experiments
- create matched groups
- waitlist: upgrade the quasi to a true experiment
threats found in quasi experiments
design confounds
maturation threat
history threats
regression to the mean
attrition
testing and instrumentation threats
observer bias
demand characteristics
placebo fx
maturation threats are typical in which designs
pretest-posttest
which threats can be addressed by adding a comparison group in quasi experiments
maturation
history
testing
how to control for observer bias in quasi experiments
use a masked or double blind design
pros of carefully designed quasi experiments
-provides real-world data (not simulated experiments)
-typically high external validity
-allows us to study issues that cannot be ethically studied in experiments
-high construct validity of the IV
similarities b/w quasi and correlational designs
-no random assignment
-both prone to internal validity threats
key differences b/w quasi and correlational designs
-in quasi: we actively seek out naturally occurring comparison groups
-quasi is more meaningful/closer to establishing causation
small N vs large N designs
small N: limited number of participants, high amount of data for each participant
large N: high number of participants, their data gets averaged out and we learn less about each person typically