Chapter 13 Quasi-Experiments Flashcards

1
Q

how are quasi-experiments similar to experiments?

A

has IVs and DVs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

main difference between quasi experiments vs experiments

A

quasi experiments don’t have full experimental control and don’t use random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

when are quasi experiments typically used?

A

in situations where random assignment is unethical (real world situations that can’t be manipulated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does the term “nonequivalent” refer to in quasi designs?

A

no use of random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

types of quasi designs

A

nonequivalent control group posttest only
nonequivalent control group pretest/posttest
nonequivalent control group interrupted time series

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2 main characteristics of a nonequivalent control group design

A
  1. no use of random assignment; instead participants were either all born with something, exposed to something naturally occurring, etc.
  2. at least 1 treatment group and 1 comparison group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what comparisons do we want to make in nonequiv posttest only designs?

A

between-subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

which threat is heavy in nonequiv posttest only design?

A

selection threats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

nonequivalent pre/post design controls most threats to internal validity except for?

A

selection effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when is the DV measured in interrupted time-series design?

A

repeatedly (before, during (could be several times) and after)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3 pros to interrupted times series design

A

-results are interpretable
-cam see normal fluctuation and trends
-can see how long lasting an effect is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why is an interrupted time series design better than a 1 group pre/post design?

A

there’s more data points which makes it easier to interpret

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how many groups does an interrupted time-series design have?

A

2 or more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

does the timing of the interruption differ b/w groups in interrupted-time series designs?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

which effects are found in quasi-experiments

A

selection effects; we don’t know if the change in DV is due to the IV or a shared participant characteristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

solutions to eliminating selection fx in quasi experiments

A
  1. create matched groups
  2. waitlist: upgrade the quasi to a true experiment
17
Q

threats found in quasi experiments

A

design confounds
maturation threat
history threats
regression to the mean
attrition
testing and instrumentation threats
observer bias
demand characteristics
placebo fx

18
Q

maturation threats are typical in which designs

A

pretest-posttest

19
Q

which threats can be addressed by adding a comparison group in quasi experiments

A

maturation
history
testing

20
Q

how to control for observer bias in quasi experiments

A

use a masked or double blind design

21
Q

pros of carefully designed quasi experiments

A

-provides real-world data (not simulated experiments)
-typically high external validity
-allows us to study issues that cannot be ethically studied in experiments
-high construct validity of the IV

22
Q

similarities b/w quasi and correlational designs

A

-no random assignment
-both prone to internal validity threats

23
Q

key differences b/w quasi and correlational designs

A

-in quasi: we actively seek out naturally occurring comparison groups
-quasi is more meaningful/closer to establishing causation

24
Q

small N vs large N designs

A

small N: limited number of participants, high amount of data for each participant
large N: high number of participants, their data gets averaged out and we learn less about each person typically

25
adv and disadv for small N designs
adv: studies special cases, can have some experimental control if compared to matched control groups disadv: external validity, internal validity sometimes
26
small N designs are commonly used in which field of psychology and why?
therapy/behavior analysis, because it allows for modifying the behaviors of certain individuals to produce a desired result
27
3 small N designs
stable-baseline multiple-baseline reversal
28
stable-baseline design
an extended observation of baseline before intervention is introduced
29
when do we know a stable-baseline design was effective
if the target behavior changes only after intervention
30
what threats can stable-baseline designs rule out
maturation regression to the mean
31
multiple baseline design
staggers interventions across times, settings, or situations
32
reversal designs
target behavior improves during treatment but reverses to baseline when treatment is removed
33
when are reversal designs used
when treatment does not have a long term effect
34
discuss 4 big validities for small N designs
internal: can be high if the study was carefully designed external: can be problematic depending on the goals of the study construct: can also be high if definitions and observations are precise statistical: not always relevant to small N studies bc we're looking at a limited number of participants