Chapter 4: Social Cognition Flashcards
(46 cards)
Primacy effect
A type of order effect whereby the information presented first in a body of evidence has a disproportionate influence on judgment
Occur often when the information is ambiguous.
What come first influences how the later information is interpreted.
Asch 1946 study
Aim: primacy effect
Procedures: Participants were asked to evaluate a hypothetical individual described by the following terms: intelligent, industrious, impulsive, critical, stubborn, and envious.
Participants rated the individual favorably, no doubt because of the influence of the two very positive terms that began the list. A second group read the same trait adjectives in the opposite order and formed a much less
favorable impression because the first two descriptive terms (stubborn and envious) were negative.
Recency effect
A type of order effect whereby the information presented last in a body of evidence has a disproportionate influence on judgment.
Framing effects
The influence on judgment resulting from the way information is presented, including the words used to describe the information or the order in which it is presented.
Spin framing
A form of framing that varies the content, not just the order, of what is presented
Positive versus negative framing
Positive framing is focusing on the good like meat is describe as 75% lean
Negative framing focuses on the negative/bad like meat being described as 25% fat.
The both mean the same thing just the framing is different
McNeil et al. 1982 Study
Aim: Positive versus negative framing
Procedures: More than 400 physicians were asked whether they
would recommend surgery or radiation for patients diagnosed with a certain type of cancer. Some were
told that of 100 previous patients who had the surgery, 90 lived through the postoperative period, 68 were still alive after a year, and 34 were still alive after five years. Eighty-two percent of these physicians recommended surgery. Others were given the same information, but it was framed in different language: 10 died during surgery or the postoperative period, 32 had died by the end of the first year, and 66 had died by the end of five years. Only 56 percent of the physicians given the
information in this form recommended surgery.
Implication: Negative information tends to attract more attention and have a greater psychological impact than positive information.
Construal level theory
A theory about the relationship between temporal distance (and other kinds of distance) and abstract or concrete thinking: Psychologically distant actions and events are thought about in abstract terms; actions and events that are close at hand are thought about in concrete terms.
Confirmation bias
The tendency to test a proposition by searching for evidence in support of it.
Crocker 1982 Study
Aim: examine confirmation bias
Procedures: One group of participants was asked to determine whether working out the day before an important tennis match makes a player more likely to win. Another group was asked to determine whether working out the day before a match makes a player more likely to lose. Both groups could examine
any of four types of information before concluding: the number of players in a sample who worked out the previous day and won their match, the number of players who worked out and lost, the number of players who didn’t work out
the previous day and won, and the number of players who didn’t work out and lost.
Findings: However, participants tended not to seek out all the necessary information. Instead, participants exhibited confirmation bias: they were especially interested in examining the information that could potentially con firm the
proposition they were investigating.
Snyder & Swann 1978
Aim: confirmation bias
Procedures: Researchers asked one group of participants to interview someone and determine whether the target person was an extrovert; another group was asked to determine whether the target person was an introvert. Participants selected their interview questions from a list provided.
Overconfidence bias
The tendency for individuals to have greater confidence in their judgments and decisions than their actual accuracy merits.
Bottom-up processing
“Data-driven” mental processing, in which an individual forms conclusions based on stimuli encountered in the environment.
Top-down processing
“Theory-driven” mental processing, in which an individual filters and interprets new information in light of preexisting knowledge and expectations
Schemas
Organized coherent packages in which related information is stored together
How do schemas affect our judgments?
They direct our attention, structure our memories, and influence our interpretations. But schemas can sometimes leads us to mischaracterize the world.
How does schema direct our attention?
Attention is selective since we can’t focus on everything.
The knowledge we bring to a given situation enables us to direct our attention to what’s most important while largely ignoring everything else.
Simons & Chabris 1999 study
Aim: Schemas and expectations guide our attention
Procedure: Participants watched a video of two teams of
three people, each passing a basketball back and forth. Members of one team wore white shirts, and
members of the other team wore black shirts. The researchers asked each participant to count the number of passes made between the members of one of the teams. Forty- five seconds into the action, a person wearing a gorilla costume strolled into the middle of the scene. Although a large gorilla might seem hard to miss, only half the participants noticed it!
Findings: The participants’ schemas about what is likely to happen in a game of catch directed their attention so intently to some parts of the video that they failed to see a dramatic stimulus they weren’t expecting.
How does schema influence memory?
We are most likely to remember stimuli that have captured our attention.
Information that fits a preexisting schema often enjoys an advantage in recall
Cohen 1981 Study
Aim: Schemas influencing memory
Procedure: Students watched a video of a husband and wife having
dinner together. Half of the students were told that the wife was a librarian and the other half that she was a waitress. The students later took a quiz that assessed their memory of what they had witnessed. The researchers asked them, for example, whether the woman was drinking wine (librarian stereotype) or beer (waitress stereotype) and whether she had received a history book (librarian) or romance novel (waitress) as a gift .
Findings: Students who thought the woman was a librarian recalled librarian-consistent information more accurately than librarian-inconsistent information, whereas those who thought she was a waitress did precisely the opposite.
How do schemas influence how we construe information?
The information that is most accessible in memory can influence how we construe new information.
Higgins, Rhole & Jones 1977 Study
Aim: Schemas influencing construal
Procedures: First, participants viewed several trait words projected on a screen as part of a perception experiment. Half the participants were shown the words adventurous, self-confident, independent, and persistent among a set of ten traits. The other half was shown the words reckless, conceited, aloof, and stubborn. After, the participants moved on to the second study on reading comprehension, in which they read a short paragraph about Donald and rated him on several trait scales.
Findings: As the investigators expected, participants who had been exposed to the words adventurous, self-confident, independent, and
persistent formed more favorable impressions of Donald than those who were shown the less flattering words.
Implication: Thus, participants’ schemas about personality traits like adventurousness and recklessness influenced the inferences they made about Donald.
Priming
The presentation of information designed to activate a concept and hence make it accessible. A prime is the stimulus presented to activate the concept in question.
Subliminal stimuli
Below the threshold of conscious awareness stimuli can prime a schema sufficiently to influence subsequent information processing