Prosocial Behavior Lecture Flashcards

1
Q

What is Prosocial Behavior?

A

Any act that benefits another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Altruism?

A

Any act that benefits another even if it involves a cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Based on evolutionary theory, why do people participate in altruism?

A

Kin selection- save someone related to you to make sure your genes survive
Reciprocity norm- animals help another animal then the animal will reciprocate and can maybe start a chain reaction
Learning social norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

J. Darley & Batson, 1973 Good Samaritan Study

A

Procedures: Use a preamble (verse) from the bible which teaches a moral lesson.
Some participants (ministers) tell a sermon on the passage, and others tell their sermons are on another topic.
They were going to pass an alley to go to another building where there was a confederate who looked homeless.
Some were told they were late for the sermon, and others were told they had a good amount of time

Results: The people who stop and help are those who are not in a hurry to the sermon (time pressure matters).
Low hurry- 63% help
Medium hurry - 45% help
High hurry - 10% help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kitty Genovese Case 1964

A

Kitty was arriving home and was attacked by someone with a knife
38 people have either heard or seen, and nobody did anything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Latane & Darley 1968

A

Aim: Bystander intervention
So many possible helpers, then nobody intervened - diffusion of responsibility

Seizure Study:
Feature a discussion between real participants and subjects; every person is allowed to speak for 2 minutes (recordings)
The victim disclaims they are prone to seizures and then has a seizure towards the end of the conversation.

Results: Who helps depends on how many other people are around the participant.
85% of people help when they are alone with the victim
62% of people help when they are with another person and the victim
31% of people help when there are 4 other people and the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Smoky Room Study

A

Aim: Pluralistic ignorance

Procedure: Complete a survey by themselves or with other “participants” (confederates). Then the room starts to fill with smoke.

Results: When alone, 75% reported the smoke
With 2 unresponsive confederates, 10% reported the smoke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Specific helping behaviors shown by humans might have evolutionary roots if they are

A

seen throughout the world
similar to those exhibited by animals
exhibited especially between related individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Daniel Batson believe about high empathy people?

A

High empathy folks will help for no other reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Tori & Batson 1983 Help Carol

A

Aim: Who will help Carol, who’s been in an accident?
(seeing vs not seeing her)
(easy-escape vs difficult escape)

Results: Low empathy: Only help if they will have to see her in their section (cost/benefit analysis)
High empathy: Doesn’t matter if in the same section; help regardless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aversive arousal reduction

A

Want to avoid feeling bad
An alternative explanation than empathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Batson et al: Take Shock for Elaine?

A

Participants are in the observer role while the confederate is getting shocked
The participants asked if they would exchange spots with Elaine.
There is an easy-escape condition where they are now able to leave and only need to answer some questions.
There is the difficult-escape condition where they are told they need to stay and watch Elaine finish her trials.

Results: Low empathy: help if can’t escape (if they have to watch her get shocked)
High Empathy: Escape relevant (if they watch or get to leave, it doesn’t matter, they will help Elaine)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Empathy-specific punishment (social reward)

A

An alternative to empathy
It looks bad if I don’t intervene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Batson et al 1988, Study 2: Help Katie?

A

Katie lost her parents in a car crash and has to take care of her brother by herself.
There are two letters, Katie wrote about what help she needs.
Made clear that additional folks would be asked later. (sign up sheet)

Results:
Low empathy: help if everyone helps, otherwise no
High empathy: Help regardless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Empathy-specific reward

A

Alternative to empathy
Feel pride when you help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Batson et al 1988 Study 1

A

Participants were told that for each question they get correct in the task reduces Brian/Janet gets less shocked. But the person may be change to non-shock condition anyway
Empathy measured

Results:
Low empathy: happy if they as participant help reduce shock -otherwise no
High empathy: happy of help OR is person changed to non-shock condition

17
Q

Negative-state relief

A

a subtype of empathy-specific reward
Helping will elevate your mood

18
Q

Batson et al 1989 Study 2,3

A

Help and get to see happy (sad) video later
Since the happy movie will elevate their mood

Results:
Low empathy: help only if not getting happy video later
High empathy: help regardless

19
Q

Vicarious Joy

A

Share the target’s joy
subtype of empathy-specific reward

20
Q

Batson et al 1991 Study 1

A

Help Katie but some participants know whether she benefited or not while others didn’t `

Results:
Low empathy: help if they know she benefited
High empathy: help regardless

21
Q

Summary of Batson Studies

A

People help if they feel empathy, not just because
Want to stop feeling bad
Fear what others will think
Expect to feel good
But because we put ourselves in their shoes

22
Q

What are other reasons to help?

A

Helping someone can put you in a good mood
Initiate or maintain to stay in a good mood by helping others
If it might ruin your mood, then you won’t help

Cognitively distracted - drunk, playing a video game

23
Q

Tai Teddy Bear Study

A

Aim: Social Isolation manipulation and Anthropomorphism

Procedures: Different conditions whether you touch the teddy bear or not

24
Q

Alcohol Myopia

A

Claude Steele
Alcohol diminished cognitive capacity
Intoxicated attend only to salient (noticeable cues)

25
Alcohol Myopia Model Predictions
It leads to disinhibited behavior when the promoting pressures are greater than the inhibiting pressures It leads to inhibited behavior when the inhibiting pressures are greater than the promoting pressures
26
Promoting Pressure Stronger Study
Task is boring (inhibitory) Strong appeal (promote) If they are drunk, the inhibitory control is out the window Result: drunk helps more
27
Ward Study
Play a boring video game (cognitive load) with a strong appeal to write a boring paragraph Inhibiting pressure: The task is boring Promoting pressure: strong appeal High cognitive load: play with 3 other players video game Weak cognitive load: play a video game by yourself The stronger pressure is what people focus on Under a high cognitive load will agree to do additional paragraphs Also, if there was a weak appeal condition with a strong cognitive load The control group will do more than the experimental group
28
How do you get pro-environmental behavior?
Seven Ways 1. Persuasive communication through fear, being concrete, try labeling 2. Evoke attitude-consistent behaviors 3. Material incentives/disincentives 4. Social Incentives/disincentives 5. Modeling 6. Channel factors 7. Give people feedback
29
Aronson Study: Hypocrisy manipulation
Different conditions: mindful only (ever waste water), commitment only (sign petition), mindful/committed (hypocrisy) People in the mindful/committed shower time are less than control
30
Cialdini's Norm Studies
Descriptive norm study Single piece litter- alerts you that people don’t litter, so the descriptive norm is that we don’t litter Injunctive norm study Someone litters, and then you notice someone sweeping the litter Then it embarks injunctive norm of not littering
31
Descriptive Norm
What's actually done
32
Injunctive Norm
What's approved of
33
Aronson study
Modeling turning off shower while soaping
34
Lee Ross Study
Neutral vs Promotive Dear Student vs Actual name Any food vs specific item to donate letter vs letter + phone call + map If they made it easy for the person to donate, if they told them exactly what they could bring Also asked most likely vs least likely to donate in food drive nominated by RAs Double (RAs) vs 8-fold (channel factors)
35
Nudge (Thaler & Sunstein)
Use defaults to encourage behavior (kind of corners the person and the person still has choice) Doesn't assume prior intention