Chapter 7 Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

Randomized Experiments

A

The allocation of sampling units to groups or conditions done through random assignment. (Random Assignment) also known as randomization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sampling Units

A

A general way of referring to the participants, subjects, groups, or objects being studied (the units sampled from the population).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Propensity Matching

A

A statistically correct matching procedure often used in observational studies with very large samples.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Between Subjects-Design or Nested Design

A

When participants are exposed to one condition each.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Method of Agreement

A

If X, then Y;

X = PResumed Cause Y= Presumed Effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sufficient Condition

A

Adequate to bring the effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Method of Difference

A

If not X, then not Y; if the presumed effect Y does not occur, the presumed cause X is absent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Necessary Condition

A

Implies that the cause is indispensable (You need the cause for the Effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Within-Subjects Design

A

Same subjects trying out different conditions. Also known as repeated measures design or cross-design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Factorial Design

A

consisting of two levels of a variable. IV; Gender > Male;Female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mixed Factorial Design

A

A design that consists of both between and within-subject factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Counterbalancing

A

To deal with the problem of systematic differences between successive treatments or measurements, you would use counterbalancing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Latin Square Design

A

A square array of letters and numbers which represent treatment conditions. Each letter appears once and only once in each row and in each column.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Material Causality

A

Substance or substances which are thought to be necessary for the movement of something or for the coming into being of an event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Formal Causality

A

Plan or development that gives meaning to the event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Final Causality or Teleological Causality

A

the action is “goal directed” Refers to the objective or purpose of the event.

17
Q

Efficient Causality

A

Refers to the activating or energizing force responsible for the event.

18
Q

Covariation

A

Conjunction between cause and effect is not necessarily constant but is likely or probable.

19
Q

Temporal precedence

A

“Priority” the assumption that cause X does in infact precede the Cause Y
.. some relationships can become a vicious circle of bidirectional cause and effect.

20
Q

Internal Validity

A

Scientists attempt on logical and empirical rounds to rule out plausible rival explanations between presumed cause and presumed outcome

21
Q

Quasi-Experimental

A

Resembling - Resembles a randomized design but it is not random.

22
Q

Biased Selection

A

How sampling units assigned to different conditions were selected for those conditions.

Bias implies that the selection procedure resulted in groups that were systematically dissimilar in characteristics even before the experimental intervention.

23
Q

Pre-Experimental Design

A

Designs viewed as too primitive and are seen as especially vulnerable to bias selection and causal misinterpretations.

24
Q

One Shot Case Study

A

X - O

X= Exposure to the intervention (Experimental Treatment)
O= Observation or measurement.
25
Bias due to history
PResence of an event other than the treatment usually concurrent with the treatment that may be responsible for the observed effect.
26
One Group Pre Post Design
Symbolized as OXO; There is no Control X Observe something Do something to Change it Observe the effects Example; Dermatology, doctor sees rash, gives you ointment, they can predict that it was the ointment that cured the rash but it is susceptible to bias due to history cause it may be something else that caused it.
27
Bias due to maturation
Bias due to Naturally occurring changes over time
28
Bias due to Attrition
Differential loss of units in some conditions. Depending on the people in your study and they are no longer there.
29
Bias due to testing
Being measured or tested initially can have an effect on the performance on the dependent variable.
30
Instrumentation Bias
Post treatment effect that was measured was due to changes in the measuring instrument.
31
Artifact
A type of error that occurs systematically rather than randomly and if left ignored or uncontrolled, it can jeopardize the validity of conclusions of the hypothesis.
32
Demand Characteristics
Cues indicating how research subjects should behave.
33
Quasi Control Subjects
Individuals who are asked to step out of the traditional role of the research subject and to think of themselves as a co-investigator. Drawn from the same population from the same experimental and control participants but are asked to reflect on the context in which the experiment is being conducted.
34
Experimental Expectancy Effect
Uncontrolled intentions or actions of the experimenters indicating where they want the experimental to lead.
35
Blind Experimenters
Experimenters who are unaware of which subjects are to receive the experimental treatment or control treatment.
36
Double Blind Procedures
Neither the human participants nor the experimenters know who is in the experimental treatment or control treatment.
37
Expectancy Control Design
Factorial design that not only assesses whether an expectancy effect is present but allows a direct comparison of that effect with the phenomenon of theoretical interest.
38
Placebo
A lacking substance