Chapter 9: Alienation Flashcards
(103 cards)
Assignment
1.1 What is an assignment?
The grant of a lease creates a leasehold interest. Just as a freehold interest may be sold or transferred to a new owner, so a leasehold interest may be sold or transferred.
1.1 What is an assignment?
We speak of the lease being assigned by the existing tenant (assignor) to the new tenant (assignee). As with a freehold, the assignee may pay for the leasehold interest, or the consideration may simply be the assignee agreeing to pay the rent and perform the other obligations of a tenant under the lease. Assignment is a form of alienation.
Alienation
This simply means a disposal of all or part of the tenant’s interest in the lease. Assignment is one form of alienation, but we will look at others.
Following assignment, the landlord becomes the landlord of the assignee.
The new tenant is now entitled to exclusive possession of the premises and is obliged to pay the
rent and perform the other tenant covenants.
The assignor is no longer entitled to use the premises, and generally need not pay the rent or
perform the other tenant covenants. However, the assignor may still have liability for them, as we
will see.
1.2 Why an assignment?
A tenant may want to assign the premises if they no longer need them for the purposes of their
business or cannot afford to keep paying the rent (perhaps following a rent review). If the premises are right for the assignee, conversely, they may be only too happy to take the lease.
Assessment focus point
If the lease is silent, then the tenant is free to assign. In practice, a commercial lease will likely require that, before assignment, the tenant apply to the landlord for consent. The landlord will want to be able to vet potential assignees.
1.2 Why an assignment?
A tenant’s covenant against assignment may be drafted as absolute, qualified or fully qualified.
An absolute covenant means that assignment is not allowed. A commercial lease will usually contain an absolute covenant against assignment of part of the premises. The landlord will not want a letting split into parts, which creates various problems (that are beyond the scope of this course)
1.3 Qualified covenants against assignment
A tenant’s covenant against assignment of whole may be qualified, meaning that assignment is only allowed with the landlord’s consent. However, s 19(1)(a) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 converts a qualified covenant into a fully qualified covenant, meaning that the landlord must act reasonably if deciding to withhold consent. This restricts the landlord’s discretion
1.3 Qualified covenants against assignment
Furthermore, s 1 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1988 goes a step further, and states that the
landlord must give its decision on consent within a reasonable time. Again, note that statute affects different provisions differently. Alienation is the area where the law comes down most heavily in favour of the tenant. This is because it is unfair to bind a tenant
to the lease and premises where there is a willing and suitable prospective tenant to take over
1.3 Qualified covenants against assignment
Case law suggests that a ‘reasonable time’ is dependent upon circumstances but should be
measured in days or weeks instead of months.
1.4 When is it reasonable to withhold consent?
There is a large body of case law on when it is reasonable for the landlord to withhold consent.
The details of this are beyond the scope of this course, but here are some examples
Example: Must relate to landlord/tenant relationship
The landlord cannot withhold consent on grounds not related to the landlord/tenant relationship,
such as a personal dislike of the prospective tenant or their business. Nor can they discriminate on
grounds of race, sex or disability.
Example: Tenant-mix policy
The would-be assignee’s proposed use of the premises may be reasonable grounds to withhold
consent. For example, in a shopping centre, the landlord may have a policy on mixing different types of shops. If the prospective assignee’s proposed use does not fit this, then it may be reasonable to
withhold consent.
Example: Inability to pay the rent
It is likely reasonable to withhold consent if the landlord has justifiable concerns about the
assignee’s ability to pay the rent; for example, if the tenant cannot produce satisfactory references. Another example would be if the assignee is newly incorporated and cannot produce accounts.
Example: Inability to pay the rent
If the landlord does not act reasonably in withholding or delaying consent, then the tenant may
be able to claim damages (including costs for agents and solicitors). The landlord will, however, have various concerns regarding assignment. A commercial lease, therefore, will contain:
* circumstances that the parties agree will be reasonable grounds for withholding consent and
* conditions that may be imposed on assignment.
Both conditions and circumstances
Both conditions and circumstances are recognised by s19(1A) Landlord and Tenant Act 1927. If valid, they provide the landlord with specific grounds on which consent may be reasonably withheld.
Effect of a circumstance or condition
A lease’s assignment covenant includes a circumstance that all yearly rent is paid up to date, and a condition that the assignee provides a guarantor of the rent and other obligations. The landlord may reasonably withhold consent to the assignment if the tenant is behind with rent or if the
assignee refuses to provide a guarantor
1.5 The assignor’s and assignee’s liabilities after assignment
Privity of contract
Privity of contract: At common law, privity of contract is the ability of the original parties to a
contract to enforce the obligations against each other, even after the contract has been
assigned
Privity of Estate
Privity of estate: By contrast, privity of estate is the ability of the landlord and tenant for the time to enforce the provisions of a lease against each other. However, not all obligations are enforceable under privity of estate.
1.5.1 Old leases
The common law position for old leases was that, despite assignment, the original tenant
remained liable to the landlord to pay the rent and perform the other obligations under privity of
contract.
1.5.1 Old leases
By contrast, there were only limited obligations that automatically passed to the new tenant
under privity of estate, and the new tenant would have to covenant directly with the landlord to
observe all the tenant’s covenants in the lease.
1.5.2 New leases
The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 changed the liability of the assignor and assignee
to reflect better the commercial reality of the situation. The Act applies to leases granted on or
after 1 January 1996, which are referred to as new leases. When a new lease is assigned, the original tenant is released from liability, and all of the tenant
covenants are passed to the new tenant
1.5.3 Authorised guarantee agreement
Landlords of old leases were used to being able to rely on privity of contract to treat the original
tenant as an effective guarantor. This stopped with new leases. However, the statute provides a mechanism whereby the original tenant can agree to guarantee the obligations of the incoming tenant. This is done by a document called an authorised
guarantee agreement (often abbreviated to AGA)
1.5.3 Authorised guarantee agreement
Many commercial leases will make it a condition of assignment that the outgoing tenant enters
into an authorised guarantee agreement. If the lease is silent, then the landlord can only insist on
an AGA if it is reasonable to do so (eg if the assignee’s ability to pay the rent is in doubt). Whereas an original tenant’s liability under an old lease extended for the whole of the lease term, an outgoing tenant only guarantees the next tenant under an AGA. If there is a subsequent assignment, then the outgoing tenant’s liability under the AGA ends.