Chapter Two THE INADEQUACY OF LESSER EVIDENCE Flashcards
What is a significant reason for confusion in the literature regarding coronary artery disease?
The tyranny of a concept or hypothesis that some investigators become overly attached to.
What can happen when presentation of a hypothesis turns into evangelistic fervor?
Progress is stopped and controversy takes over.
What did researchers set out to test from the 1950s onward?
Ancel Keys’s hypothesis that coronary heart disease is strongly influenced by dietary fats.
How did the literature regarding dietary fats and coronary heart disease change by 1977?
It grew to ‘unmanageable proportions’ with conflicting evidence.
What was Jeremiah Stamler’s perspective on the evidence for Keys’s hypothesis?
He believed they had a ‘totality of data’ supporting it, although it was only half the evidence.
What did Thomas Dawber state about the diet-heart relation in 1978?
It was an unproved hypothesis that needed much more investigation.
What was a critical difference in philosophy between proponents and skeptics of Keys’s hypothesis?
Skeptics demanded rigorous scientific evidence, while proponents acted on the belief they had to provide immediate advice.
What did proponents of Keys’s hypothesis believe about treating patients?
They believed patients should be treated as if they already had heart disease to prevent it.
What was the purpose of the National Diet-Heart Study planned in 1961?
To determine if changes in diet could help prevent heart attacks.
What did Keys imply about the absence of final proof for his hypothesis?
It was not evidence that the hypothesis was wrong.
What role did the press play in the dietary-fat controversy?
It favored proponents of the hypothesis, creating a positive feedback loop.
What is confirmation bias?
The tendency to interpret evidence selectively in favor of one’s hypothesis.
What did George Mann conclude about the Masai nomads’ cholesterol levels?
Their low cholesterol levels did not correlate with heart disease, contradicting Keys’s hypothesis.
What did Keys argue about the Masai’s unique cholesterol metabolism?
He suggested they had evolved a mechanism to suppress cholesterol synthesis.
What did the Framingham Heart Study reveal about cholesterol and heart disease risk?
High cholesterol was associated with increased heart disease risk, but the association was not consistent across all demographics.
What did the Framingham investigators note about cholesterol’s predictive value for women over fifty?
Cholesterol had ‘no predictive value’ for them.
What was the outcome of the dietary research from Framingham regarding Keys’s hypothesis?
It failed to support the hypothesis and was not widely published.
What is the importance of rigorous scientific skepticism in research?
It helps prevent selective interpretation and encourages thorough testing of hypotheses.
Fill in the blank: The dietary-fat controversy exemplified the issue of _______ in scientific research.
confirmation bias
True or False: The Framingham Heart Study was published in a medical journal during the early 1960s.
False
What was the main focus of the Framingham Study?
To assess the diet and cholesterol levels of men with high and low cholesterol levels
The study involved interviewing and assessing a thousand local subjects between 1957 and 1960.
What did the Framingham Study reveal about the diets of men with high and low cholesterol?
There was no difference in the amount or type of fat consumed between the two groups
This finding raised questions about the role of diet in cholesterol levels.
What cautionary note was injected into the Framingham Study findings?
The variation in serum cholesterol levels was not explained by diet as measured in the study
This suggests other factors might influence cholesterol levels.
What challenge does the phrase ‘as measured here’ represent in scientific investigation?
It highlights the difficulties in accurately measuring dietary intake and its relationship to health outcomes
It reflects the limitations in establishing causal relationships.