Cognitive development in adolescence Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

Defining adolescence?

A
  • “a period of physical, psychological and social transition between childhood and adulthood” (Spear, 2000)
  • “Rather than age 10 – 19 years, a definition of 10 – 24 years corresponds more closely to adolescent growth and popular understandings of this life phase” (Sawyer et al., 2018)
  • “begins with the onset of puberty and ends with the assumption of a stable adult role” (Damon, 2004)
  • Transition between childhood and adulthood
  • Biologically: onset of puberty, sexual maturity, brain reorganisation
  • Socially: increased independence from parents and increased importance of peer group
  • Cultural (and historical) variations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Variation?

A
  • Menarche = onset of menstruation
  • Historical variation in timing of puberty as well as cultural variation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Brain development in adolescence?

definition

A
  • “it appears that the brain changes characteristic of adolescence are among the most dramatic and important to occur during the human lifespan”
    Steinberg (2010, p.160):
  • change in the ratio of grey to white matter in prefrontal areas
  • increase in connectivity
  • changes in subcortical processes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Brain development in adolescence?

Change in the ratio of grey to white matter in prefrontal areas

A
  • Change in the ratio of grey to
    • Synaptogenesis:
      • In early years, each neuron forms synapses with thousands of other neurons, resulting in the formation of trillions of connections
    • Synaptic pruning:
      • In early adolescence, the overabundance of neurons and synapses must be eliminated. This reduces grey matter.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Brain development in adolescence?

Change in the ratio of grey to white matter in prefrontal areas

A
  • Change in the ratio of grey to
    • Myelination
      • Coating of the neurons to improve connections.
    • Axonal caliber:
      • Increase in axonal diameter improves efficiency of transmission.
      • These increase white matter through adolescence and into adulthood.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Brain development in adolescence?

Increase in connectivity

A
  • Connections between cortical (prefrontal) and subcortical (limbic system) areas increase throughout adolescence.
  • Parallel increases in functional connectivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brain development in adolescence?

Changes in subcortical processes

A
  • In early adolescence, dopamine receptors are remodelled
  • Increase in dopaminergic activity in prefrontal–striatal–limbic pathways
  • These changes have been linked to changes in reward-directed activity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Brain development in adolescence?

Temporary imbalance

A
  • early development in limbic systems; more gradual development of prefrontal cortex
  • Dual systems model of risk taking and decision making (Steinberg, 2010)
  • “heightened risk taking in adolescence is the product of an easily aroused reward system and an immature self-regulatory system” (Steinberg, 2009, p.744)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is Piaget’s theory of cognitive development?

A
  • Stages of development
    • Sensorimotor 0-2 yrs): intelligence expressed through sensory and motor abilities - bound to here and now.
    • Preoperational (2-7 yrs): able to represent experiences in language, mental imagery and symbolic thought. But unable to perform mental operations, e.g. represent multiple dimensions simultaneously.
    • Concrete operational (7-12 yrs): able to reason logically about concrete processes. Unable to reason purely abstractly or test hypotheses.
    • Formal operational (12+ yrs): able to reason about abstractions and hypothetical situations, generalise information and form experiments to test hypotheses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is Piaget’s theory of cognitive development?

Logical (formal) deductive reasoning

A
  • Logical (formal) deductive
  • Pre formal operational stage, children cannot ‘do’ this kind of reasoning.
  • Once in the formal operational stage, young people can ‘do’ this kind of reasoning.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is Piaget’s theory of cognitive development?

Formal operational stage characteristics

A
  • Abstract thought – operations are abstracted away from concrete operations.
    • Interpropositional thinking – considering more than one proposition at a time.
  • Realms of possibility – can apply logical thinking to possible realities as well as actual reality to think about what might be possible.
  • Hypothetico-deductive reasoning – adolescent as apprentice scientist: can develop theories, generate hypotheses and test them systematically.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is Piaget’s tasks?

A
  • Balance Scale problem (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958)
    • Tests interpropositional thinking – considering more than one proposition at a time.
    • Must consider weight and distance at the same time.
    • Only adolescents succeed.
  • Pendulum problem (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958)
    • Tests hypothetico-deductive reasoning.
    • Concrete operational children try different pendulums, but not in a systematic way
    • Formal operational adolescents make hypotheses and systematically vary one variable at a time, then combine.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the Critiques of Piaget’s theory?

A
  • Overestimates formal operational thinking
    • Not all adolescents use formal operational thinking.
    • Some reach this stage later than predicted, or not at all
    • Formal thinking develops gradually
      • Not a qualitative shift in early adolescence
      • Not used consistently on all tasks.
  • Theory assumes understanding is constructed and knowledge / experience play little role in development.
    • Training does increase formal operational thinking (Case, 1974).
    • Knowledge affects performance on operational tasks (De Lisi & Staudt, 1980).
    • Cross-generationally, adolescents have got better on these tasks suggesting environmental factors impact development (Flieller, 1999).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did De Lisi & Staudt, (1980) study?

A
  • Individual differences in college students’ performance on formal operations tasks.
  • 30 UG students (20-23 years) studying Physics, Politics or English
  • 3 formal operational tasks relevant to each different subject
    • Pendulum task (Physics)
    • Political Socialization Concepts task (Politics)
    • Literary Styles Analysis task (English)
  • More students showed formal level thinking on tasks related to their subject knowledge.
  • 40-60% showed formal thinking on tasks not related to their subject knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did Flieller (1999) study?

A
  • Comparison of the development of formal thought in adolescent cohorts aged 10 to 15 years (1967-1996 and 1972-1993)
  • Compared cohorts of children tested in the 1970s and the 1990s on 5 ‘Piagetian’ tasks, including conservation and pendulum tasks.
  • Children were late concrete/early formal operational stage (10–12 years) or mid formal operational stage (13–15 years)
  • 10- to 12- year olds’ performance improved by 5 points in a generation.
  • Mean operational level of the 13- to 15-year-old adolescents was higher in 1996 than in 1967.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the Post-Piagetian approaches?

A
  • Adolescents as intuitive scientists (Kuhn, 1989)
  • Children can construct theories and test them
  • Cognitive development is domain-specific
  • Different theories and methods for different domains
  • Development is metacognitive
    • Does not involve underlying logical competence.