Prosocial and moral development in childhood and adolescence Flashcards
(16 cards)
what is Social development?
- Characterised by:
- Continuity: some behaviours, especially aggression, show consistency throughout development.
- Transformation: development involves qualitative change in social behaviour, reliant on cognitive and emotional development
What is prosocial behaviour?
- “voluntary behaviour intended to benefit another” (Eisenberg et al., 2006)
- “any voluntary, intentional action that produces a positive or beneficial outcome for the recipient, regardless of whether that action is costly to the donor, neutral in its impact, or beneficial” (Grusec et al., 2002)
- Distinct from altruistic behaviour: no intentional benefit to the helper, possible cost (disadvantage or danger).
- Prosocial behaviour can have selfish or non-selfish motivations.
- Prosocial behaviour can be motivated by empathy and/or sympathy.
- Prosocial can be motivated by social/cultural norms.
what is Prosocial vs antisocial behaviour?
- Is ‘bad’ antisocial behaviour at the opposite end of a continuum from ‘good’ prosocial behaviour?
- Personality traits associated with one are also associated in the opposite way with the other (Krueger et al., 2001).
- Higher aggressive tendencies positively correlated with antisocial behaviour and negatively correlated with prosocial behaviour
what is the Development of prosocial behaviour?
- Early emergence, no gender differences
- Parental reports of sharing, helping, comforting in preschoolers
- Intention to benefit another is not always clear
- May be a reaction to others
- Praise-seeking
- Experimental research tests causes.
- Are children motivated by material or verbal rewards?
- Do children learn through modelled behaviour or teaching?
- Children who observed donated more than those who were told, but not 3 weeks later.
what type of studies are used in the Development of prosocial behaviour?
- Observational studies
- Reveal early emergence
- Suggest that parents reward prosocial behaviour and react to a lack of prosocial behaviour where expected.
- Self-report, e.g. Prosocial Tendencies Measure (Carlo et al., 2003)
- Reveal motivations for prosocial behaviour
- Adolescents less likely to act prosocially for approval; more likely to act according to principles/concern for others
what are the Factors influencing development?
- Temperament/personality traits – e.g. empathy
- Socialization
- Parental intervention (not punishment)
- Siblings
- Schools/peers
- Cultural values/norms
- Social contexts and experiences are key to development.
How can we study morality?
- Morality: set of principles or ideals that help the individual distinguish right from wrong
- Research has centered on 3 moral components:
- Affective Component: the feelings that surround right or wrong actions and that motivate moral thoughts or actions.
- Cognitive Component: the way we conceptualize right and wrong and make decisions about how to behave.
- Behavioral Component: how we actually behave when we experience the temptation to lie, cheat, or violate other moral views.
what are the Cognitive-developmental approaches?
- Moral development is linked to cognitive development.
- Global stage theories: children universally pass through different developmental stages
- Children learn to act morally through conventions then according to moral principles
- Evidenced by children’s and adolescents’ responses to moral dilemmas.
what is Piaget’s Theory of Moral Development?
- The Moral Judgement of the Child (1932)
- Children’s developing moral understanding judged from their use and understanding of rules in games.
- Development from being fixed by higher authority to mutually agreed by peers.
- Linked to decline in egocentrism, increase in operational thought and peer conflict.
what is Piaget’s Theory of Moral Development?
different ages
- Up to 4 or 5 years
- Premoral judgement
- Rules not understood
- From 4-5 years to 9-10 years
- “Moral realism (Heteronomous morality of constraint)”
- Rules come from higher authority and cannot be changed
- “Evaluate actions by outcomes”
- “Punishment as inevitable retribution”
- After 9-10 years
- “Moral subjectivism (Autonomous morality of cooperation)”
- “Rules are created by people and can be changed by mutual consent”
- Evaluate actions by intentions
- Punishment as chosen to fit crime
what is Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development?
- Revised and extended Piaget’s theory.
- Based on interviews with 50 American males every 3 years.
- Responses categorised into 3 levels of moral reasoning;
- 6 substages.
- Stages are universal and follow a fixed order, dependent on cognitive development and social role-taking.
what is Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development?
Level 1
- Level 1: Pre-conventional Morality: Individual reasons in relation to himself, not conventional or societal rules and expectations.
- Stage 1: Heteronomous morality: Right and wrong are determined by adults; punishment orientation.
- Stage 2: Instrumental morality: Individual conforms to rules in order to gain rewards or satisfy personal goals.
what is Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development?
Level 2
- Level 2: Conventional Morality: Moral behaviour confirms to and upholds societal rules, expectations and conventions.
- Stage 3: Interpersonal normative morality “Good boy” or “Good girl” Orientation, moral behaviour which is perceived to please, aid and assist others.
- Stage 4: Social system morality
- Rules are obeyed to maintain social order, laws should be upheld.
what is Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development?
Level 3
- Level 3: Post conventional Morality: Understanding of societal rules but moral judgments based on universal moral principles; judgement by principle not convention.
- Stage 5: Social contract orientation Individual sees the laws as tools for expressing the will of the majority of human welfare.
- Stage 6: Universal ethical principles Individual defines right and wrong on the basis of their self-chosen ethical principles.
what are the Critiques of cognitive-developmental approaches?
- Dilemmas are unnaturalistic/not relevant to certain ages.
- Behaviour cannot be predicted by moral stage – hypothetical dilemmas are not related to actions.
- Results from male samples predominantly.
- Cross-cultural differences
- Moral stages do not explain broad social cognition
what is the Domain approach to moral development?
- Moral concepts are universal but social conventions differ (Turiel, 2002).
- Distinguishes domains of morality and social conventions.
- Morality: fairness, harm and rights
- Social conventions: societal rules, etiquette, uniformities.
- Moral rules are fixed and binding, social conventions are negotiable.
- Children understand and can reason about morality and social conventions in different ways as young as 4 years.
- Hitting is not right, ever.
- Eating with your hands can be ok.
- Personal experiences underpin early moral development; reasoning becomes more abstract.
- Social experiences are important for learning.