Developmental psych in the real world Flashcards
(20 cards)
what is Memory development?
- Two factors, relevant to eyewitness testimony, which influence memory development are:
- Knowledge development and scripts
- Metamemory
what is Knowledge development and scripts? (1)
- Knowledge development supports memory
- Recall of events is supported by our knowledge of how events work in general – scripts
what is Knowledge development and scripts? (2)
- Familiar events have a ‘script’ – a generalised event representation:
- Scripts: A series of slots and causal links between the slots
- E.g. what normally happens at a restaurant / at school / at the doctors
- Scripts provide top-down structure for events
- Fill in the gaps rather than remember everything
- Make assumptions that events fit the script
- Congruent events recalled more accurately.
- Memory is constructive
what is Knowledge development and scripts? (3)
- Children can generate recall of events based around scripts
- Preschoolers can generate scripts, e.g. for eating out events
- Limited detail – focus on main actions
(Nelson & Gruendel, 1981)
- Limited detail – focus on main actions
- Younger children prone to error or missing detail – less knowledge
- E.g. young children recall leaving a building then hearing a fire alarm (Pillemer et al., 1994)
- With age and experience children’s scripts become more detailed
what is Metamemory?
- Procedural metamemory – awareness of how memory works
- 5-year-olds know long lists are harder and require more effort than short lists (Wellman, Collins & Glieberman, 1981)
- Declarative metamemory (memory monitoring) – knowledge about the appropriate use of mnemonics
- Not used spontaneously by young children (before ~ 8-10)
- Children can learn to use mnemonics – becomes more sophisticated with age.
Children’s ability to act as eyewitness?
- Quantity and quality of recall increase with age:
- developing memory processes
- knowledge and language development (scripts)
- understanding of and ability to use explicit memory enhancing strategies
- (Older) children’s recall of events tends to be accurate but limited in quantity.
- But children are more likely to give incorrect answers to misleading questions.
Goodman and Reed (1986)
Children’s ability to act as eyewitness?
- Suggestibility
- Younger children are more susceptible to suggestion
- More likely to create a false memory
- Why might this be?
- Cognitive factors
- Encode less information/more weakly more gaps in memory
- Difficulty with source monitoring – distinguishing what they experienced and information mentioned to them
- Social factors
- Deliberately suggestive questions – children respond inappropriately
- Social pressure to respond to an adult – police/lawyers are unfamiliar and authoritative
- Testimonial issues
- Stereotypes – having a schema for something or someone can bias how memories are encoded/reported
- Repeated questioning – repeated suggestive questioning of children’s (weak) memories can lead to false memory/changing response
what is the Texas vs. Macias murder trial (1987)?
- Murder case in which Macias was convicted partly on the testimony of a child and sentenced to death.
- 9-year-old child witness:
- Often told by parent that Macias was a ‘bad man’
- Subjected to repeated detailed, suggestive interviews
- Said she wanted to help the adults
- Recanted her testimony several years later, resulted in a stay of execution and eventual acquittal of Macias
what did Leichtmann & Ceci, 1995 study?
- The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers’ reports
- Preschool children witnessed a neutral event with a ‘clumsy character’ Sam Stone
- All children were questioned about it 4 times.
- All children had a cognitive interview 10 weeks later
- Control group: no information about Sam, neutral questions
- Stereotype group: presented with clumsy stereotype 12 times before event; neutral questions
- Suggestion group: no information about Sam, suggestive questions
- Stereotype + suggestion group: both manipulations
- The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers’ reports
- False memories increased with interference but decreased with age.
Memory development and eyewitness testimony?
- Memory processes develop continuously across infancy and childhood.
- These are partly due to development of ‘bottom up’ processes (increased encoding and retrieval) and partly due to ‘top down’ processes (increased language, knowledge, and explicit strategies).
- Children can form false memories – the interaction of cognitive and social factors is important for reporting of memory, for example in eye-witness testimony.
- Interview techniques which take development into account improve recall in children.
Cognitive development and education?
- Developmental psychology research:
- uncovers children’s cognitive capabilities
- informs what they can manage in an educational setting
- uncovers children’s cognitive capabilities
- provides theories of how and why they develop
- informs how to teach them and how they can learn
- informs educational practice, theory and policy
Constructivism → ‘Child-centred’ education?
- Levin et al., (1990): Training effects on conceptions of motion
- 6th graders (10-11 yrs)
- incorrect intuitive concept of speed
- physical experience acting out problem changed understanding and led to generalisation.
- Developmentally appropriate provision
- a child has to be cognitively ‘ready’ to learn a certain concept
- ‘reading readiness’
- logical reasoning
- mathematical reasoning
- a child has to be cognitively ‘ready’ to learn a certain concept
- National curriculum
- Core subjects
- Attainment targets
- Standardised Key Stages
- Assessment
- Criterion-referenced testing, e.g. SATs assumes fixed and universal development stages.
Egocentrism → Peer interaction
- Peer interaction can help challenge egocentrism
- sociocognitive conflict – hold conflicting egocentric views
- Doise & Mugny (1984): 3-stage peer interaction paradigm.
- Pre-test: Children tested individually
- Test: Experimental children tested as pair; control children tested individually
- Post-test: Children tested individually
- Working in pairs on this task improve performance long-term.
- Pair working in the classroom is a successful tool for learning.
what is Piaget’s influence on education?
- Discovery based learning
- Set up tasks and situations for children to explore
- Allow problems to occur for the children to solve
- ‘Child as a scientist’
- Developmentally appropriate provision
- Children are not taught something before they are ‘ready’ to learn it
- E.g. don’t teach an 8 year old formal operational concepts
- Peer interaction and collaboration
- Egocentric children may learn more effectively from other children at similar developmental levels when they have conflicting ideas.
- Pair-work, especially when understanding is conflicting
Play and language → Early years learning?
- Children are given opportunities for pretend play
- Children are encouraged to talk out loud
ZPD → Personalised learning?
- Zone of proximal development
- Distance between actual developmental level and level of potential development
- Teaching should be aimed at the ZPD.
Scaffolding → Collaborative learning?
- The means by which an adult structures and simplifies a child’s environment to facilitate learning (Bruner, 1983)
- Adult must assess current and potential level of functioning (ZPD)
- Guide through a child’s ZPD – provide appropriate level of help scaffolding.
- E.g. Wood & Middleton, (1975)
- Peers can also provide scaffolding:
- More successful when paired with a child of higher ability
- More successful when children explain to each other what to do, (Fawcett & Garton, 2005)
- Peer tutoring: Interaction with / tutoring from a more advanced peer
what were Vygotsky’s influence on education?
- Learning through play and language
- Young children learn through pretend play
- Children encouraged to talk out loud (private speech)
- Personalised learning (ZPD)
- Activities pitched to appropriate level
- Teacher provides support to suit individual
- Collaborative learning (scaffolding)
- Teacher guides learning
- Pair-work with mixed abilities/peer-tutoring
- ‘child as apprentice’
what were Kohlberg’s influence in education?
- Different stages of moral understanding behaviour management
- Conduct and performance behaviours need managing.
- Acceptable vs unacceptable behaviours are well understood; how to manage them is less clear cut
- Theories of children’s developing understanding can inform this - developmentally appropriate behaviours
what were the Challenges and realities?
- Teaching has become curriculum-focused rather than child-focused.
- “The school curriculum is at the heart of education” (DES, 1981)
- Learning is assessed against criterion-referenced testing
- Personalised learning is hard to implement in large classroom contexts.
- Peer interaction can benefit but children aren’t as good as adults at giving guidance.
- Some things to think about:
- How up-to-date are these theories in Psychology?
- What do subsequent findings about cognitive development mean for education?
- How might information-processing theory be applied to education practice?