Language development in childhood and bilingualism Flashcards

(23 cards)

1
Q

Nature vs nurture?

A
  • Nature: Language-specific areas of the brain
    • how much is hard-wired is subject to debate
  • Nurture: Early exposure to language is critical
    • how much and what type of language is subject to debate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is Chomsky’s Language Acquisition Device?

A
  • Learning/experience cannot account for all aspects of language acquisition.
  • Children must have innate knowledge of language: AKA Universal Grammar
  • This is a nativist theory of language acquisition.
  • Two key arguments:
    • Speed and uniformity of development
    • Poverty of the stimulus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Speed and uniformity of development?

A
  • Children acquire language quickly
  • Early comprehension suggests early knowledge
  • Children’s early language follows rules
  • Universal stages of development
    • Even though input differs between individuals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Poverty of the stimulus?

A
  • Input language is not always grammatical
  • Input language does not provide sufficient information
  • Parents do not correct errors or explain language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Experience-based language development?

A
  • Language is a behaviour learned entirely from the environment, there is no innate knowledge/abilities
    • Interaction-based – learning from social interactions, learning closely matches the input
    • Connectionist/statistical-based – language is learnt by tracking the nature of the input, finding patterns in the language
  • Language is learned through cognitive and social processes:
    • Statistical learning
    • Infant-directed speech
    • Interaction and implicit correction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Interaction and implicit correction?

A
  • Parent’s rarely explicitly correct their child’s errors
    Correction is rarely successful:
    Theo: Hold this robot very carefully as it doesn’t have to [mustn’t] be breaked

    Me: Broken

    Theo: Or breaked! (with emphasis)
  • But parents provides indirect feedback to correct errors: recasting:
    Alex: I had all my breakfast and I drinked up all the milk
    Dad: You drank the whole bowl?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do children learn to combine words?

A
  • Languages have structure and sentences have structure
  • Which sentence sounds better?
    • Colourless green ideas sleep furiously
    • Sleep green furiously ideas colourless
  • We can represent these structures in ‘tree’ diagrams.
  • Speakers acquire and store representations of structure based on abstract categories.
  • These structures have ‘rules’ – syntax.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the difference hypotheses on How do children learn to combine words?

A
  • Different hypotheses:
    • Children are born with innate knowledge of basic language rules or basic processes to support language acquisition.
    • This allows them to acquire abstract syntax rules very early
    • Children have to learn the language rules from their experience with language.
    • This takes time and is a gradual process, thought to be linked to words early on and gradually extended to abstract rules.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Combining words in comprehension?

A
  • Preferential looking methods:
    • Children watch two videos of different events.
    • Children hear sentences that match one video – they have to use the sentence structure to understand which video is referred to.
    • Preferential-looking measures looking time – people tend to look at the stimuli that best matches what they think they’re hearing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did Golinkoff, Hirsh-Pasek, Cauley, & Gordon study?

A
  • The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm.
  • Tested toddlers aged 2 years 4 months
  • Preferential looking task
  • Toddlers look reliably longer at matching video
  • 17-month-olds also pass the same test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what did Naigles 1990 study?

A
  • Children use syntax to learn verb meanings.
  • Tested toddlers aged 2 years 1 months
  • Preferential looking task
  • Toddles looked longer at the matching video even when the sentence had a made-up word.
  • 19-month-olds pass the same kind of test too
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did Akhtar 1999 study?

A
  • Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure
  • Tested 2- to 4-year-olds in ‘Weird Word Order’ tasks.
  • Children are taught a new verb in a ‘weird’ word order (e.g. VSO)
    • “Tams[V] Elmo[S] the car[O]” meaning ‘Elmo ‘catapulted’ the car’
  • Test – when prompted, do children use the new word as they have experienced it (VSO)?
  • Nurture: Early exposure to language is critical
    • “Tams Elmo the car”
  • Or, do children use the new word with English word order (SVO)
    • “Elmo tams the car”
  • Results:
    • 4-year-olds used English not ‘weird’ word order
    • 2-/3-year-olds copied weird word order with new word but not familiar words.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Combining words in production?

A
  • Syntactic priming is the (unconscious) repetition of syntactic structure (but not lexical content) across successive utterances (and speakers).
  • Syntactic priming is related to activation of abstract representations of syntactic structures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did Branigan & Messenger, (2016) study?

A
  • Consistent and cumulative effects of syntactic experience in children’s sentence production.
  • Tested 3- to 4-year-olds
  • Syntactic priming picture description task
  • Results:
    • Children produced more passive structures when they heard passive primes than when they heard active primes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do children learn to use language?

A
  • What do the following mean (literally)? How does this compare to what we mean we say them?
    • Can you pass the salt?
    • (after something bad happens) Oh great! That’s just what I need!
    • What do you get if you cross a kangaroo with a sheep? A woolly jumper
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Referring expressions?

A
  • What’s the difference in meaning between these two sentences?
    • “Look, there’s a cat” “Look, there’s the cat”
  • 14-month-old children understand distinctions in reference
    • Where is the other toy?
    • Can you give it to me?
  • 7-year-old children make mistakes producing reference:
    • There’s the cat (a new cat)
    • Look at the cat. The cat is having some milk.
17
Q

Bi- (Multi-) lingualism?

A
  • Simultaneous bi- (multi-) lingualism: two languages at the same time.
  • Sequential bi- (multi-) lingualism: one language first, a second added later
  • Balanced bi- (multi-) lingualism: equal competence in both
  • Heritage language speaker: heritage (minority) language is first language, societal (majority) language as second language.
  • Bilingual vocabulary may lag behind vocabulary in monolingual speakers.
  • Bilingual (total) vocabularies do not differ when both languages are combined. (Hoff et al., 2011)
18
Q

what is the Unitary language hypothesis (Volterra & Taeschner, 1978)?

A
  • bilingual children do not distinguish their two languages at early stages of development:
    • Children have one language system, including lexicon.
    • Children have two lexicons but one syntax system.
    • Children have two separate lexicons and two separate syntax systems.
19
Q

what is Language mixing?

A
  • evidence for unitary language hypothesis:
  • Bilingual children mix languages
  • Some studies suggest mixing decreases with age
  • Mixing languages could be evidence that children do not separate their two languages.
20
Q

Bilingualism: one system or two?

A
  • Language mixing is not evidence of confusion
    • Bilingual children mix languages because they are still acquiring the vocabulary in both languages (Genesee & Nicoladis, 2006).
    • Mixing languages is common amongst bilinguals, including adults (code switching)
      • Children do it because adults do.
      • Children do it because it serves important communicative functions.
21
Q

what are the systems theories?

A
  • Autonomous systems theory / separate development hypothesis
    • Children learn two languages independently.
    • The two languages have limited influence on each other.
  • Interdependent systems theory
    • Children’s development of one language influences the development of the other.
    • The two language systems interact.
22
Q

what is the Crosslinguistic influence?

A
  • Where languages differ in some way (particularly syntax, morphology and pragmatics), children’s language production in one language resembles elements of the other language.
  • Italian is a pro-drop language – pronouns are not expressed.
    • “Mangia la torta” – ‘eats cake”
  • In English, pronouns are obligatory.
    • “He eats cake”
  • Italian bilingual children produce more pronouns in Italian than Italian monolingual children.
23
Q

what is Crosslinguistic syntactic priming

A
  • The repetition of syntactic structures across utterances and across languages.
  • Vasilyeva et al., 2013: Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in bilingual children.
    • Tested 65 English-Spanish bilingual 5-year-olds.
    • Crosslinguistic priming of passives – have overlapping syntax in English and Spanish.