Cultural Varitaions In Attchment Flashcards

(7 cards)

1
Q

Who did the study

A

Vanljzendoorn and Kroonenberg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aim of the study

A

To look at the promotion of secure, insecure avoidant and insecure resistant across different countries to assess cultural variation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Procedure

A
  • 32 studies here the strange situation had been used to investigate attachment types
  • Conducted in 8 countries (12 were USA)
  • Overall studies yielded data for 1990 children
  • Data was meta-analyzed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Findings

A
  • In all countries secure attachment was the most common classification (varies from 75% in Britain to 50% in china)
    • Individualistic culture rates of insecure-resistant were similar to Ainsworth original sample (under 14%)
    • collectivist cultures like from china, Japan and Israel had rates of insecure-resistant above 25%.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain findings

A
  • These results are probably because child-rearing styles vary in different cultures; in individualistic cultures children are probably left alone more and raised to be by themselves which results in higher rates of secure and low rates of insecure-resistant.
  • Whereas collectivist cultures raise their kids by focusing on family and never leaving them alone, which leads to the higher rates of insecure-resistant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conclusion

A
  • In all countries secure attachment was the most common, however across different cultures the rates of insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant varied (avoidant seen more in individualistic, resistant more in collectivist)
  • Supports Bowlby’s idea that attachment is innate and universal
  • However provides evidence for cultural practices having an influence of attachment type
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Grossman and Takahashi find?

A
  • Takahashi - babies displayed very high levels of separation anxiety so more were classified as insecure-resistant. Suggested that this type of attachment was not due to the high rates of attachment insecurity but to the unusual nature of the experience in Japan where the mother-baby separation is rare.
    • Grossman - found that German infants tended to be classified as insecurely-attached rather than securely attached; different child rearing practices. The culture = interpersonal difference between mother and child so they don’t engage in proximity seeking behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly