Cultural Varitaions In Attchment Flashcards
(7 cards)
1
Q
Who did the study
A
Vanljzendoorn and Kroonenberg
2
Q
Aim of the study
A
To look at the promotion of secure, insecure avoidant and insecure resistant across different countries to assess cultural variation
3
Q
Procedure
A
- 32 studies here the strange situation had been used to investigate attachment types
- Conducted in 8 countries (12 were USA)
- Overall studies yielded data for 1990 children
- Data was meta-analyzed
4
Q
Findings
A
- In all countries secure attachment was the most common classification (varies from 75% in Britain to 50% in china)
- Individualistic culture rates of insecure-resistant were similar to Ainsworth original sample (under 14%)
- collectivist cultures like from china, Japan and Israel had rates of insecure-resistant above 25%.
5
Q
Explain findings
A
- These results are probably because child-rearing styles vary in different cultures; in individualistic cultures children are probably left alone more and raised to be by themselves which results in higher rates of secure and low rates of insecure-resistant.
- Whereas collectivist cultures raise their kids by focusing on family and never leaving them alone, which leads to the higher rates of insecure-resistant
6
Q
Conclusion
A
- In all countries secure attachment was the most common, however across different cultures the rates of insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant varied (avoidant seen more in individualistic, resistant more in collectivist)
- Supports Bowlby’s idea that attachment is innate and universal
- However provides evidence for cultural practices having an influence of attachment type
7
Q
What did Grossman and Takahashi find?
A
- Takahashi - babies displayed very high levels of separation anxiety so more were classified as insecure-resistant. Suggested that this type of attachment was not due to the high rates of attachment insecurity but to the unusual nature of the experience in Japan where the mother-baby separation is rare.
- Grossman - found that German infants tended to be classified as insecurely-attached rather than securely attached; different child rearing practices. The culture = interpersonal difference between mother and child so they don’t engage in proximity seeking behaviour.