DECLINE OF MUGHAL EMPRIE [14] {topic 1} Flashcards
(6 cards)
1
Q
How did the infighting between Aurangzeb’s successors contribute to the collapse of the Mughal Empire?
A
- The infighting between Aurangzeb’s successors was a major factor in the empire’s collapse.
- The wars of succession created bitterness, bloodshed, and a loss of money and prestige for the Mughal Empire.
- After each emperor’s death, royal princes competed violently for the throne.
- Aurangzeb himself had fought his brothers Dara Shikoh and Shuja.
- After him, Bahadur Shah came to power by defeating and killing his brothers Azam and Kam Baksh.
- He ruled for only five years until he died in 1712, after which his sons began fighting for power.
- This constant internal conflict greatly weakened the empire’s strength and stability, making it more vulnerable to both internal and external threats.
2
Q
What role did Aurangzeb’s policies play in weakening the Mughal Empire?
A
Aurangzeb was unpopular due to his strict policies against non-Muslims.
- He reimposed Jiziya, demolished Hindu temples, and adopted a harsh attitude toward Sikhs.
- He banned activities like painting, music, gambling, and dance.
- While he tried to ban practices like Suttee, his heavy taxes to fund military campaigns and luxurious projects drained the treasury.
- These measures made him unpopular and created challenges for his successors.
3
Q
How did the rise of Maratha power contribute to the decline of the Mughal Empire?
A
- The rise of Maratha power was a serious threat to the Mughal Empire.
- The Marathas, led by Shivaji during Aurangzeb’s reign, used guerrilla warfare to challenge Mughal authority in southern India.
- Aurangzeb’s 25 years campaign in Deccan trying to defeat them, depleted the empire’s resources and lost many top generals.
- By 1737, the Marathas defeated the Mughals near Delhi and expanded their control as far as Bengal.
- By 1760, they had become the most powerful force in India, and the Mughals could do little to stop them. This erosion of central power hastened the empire’s collapse
4
Q
How did the character of later Mughal rulers contribute to the collapse of the empire?
A
Aurangzeb’s successors led extravagant lifestyles, neglected state affairs, and became morally corrupt.
- They failed to defend or consolidate the empire, becoming complacent due to the empire’s past success.
- Their lack of leadership and administrative skill allowed the empire to decay from within and made it increasingly vulnerable to external threats.
5
Q
How did invasions by the Persians and Afghans weaken the Mughal Empire?
A
- Aurangzeb’s death left a weakened empire under inefficient rulers.
- Nadir Shah invaded in 1738-39, looting Delhi and taking immense wealth like gold, jewels, and treasures like the Peacock Throne.
- Afghan leader Ahmed Shah Abdali followed, attacking Mughal territories between 1748 and 1767, plundering wealth, and defeating the Marathas in the 3rd battle of panipat.
- These invasions further destabilized the empire.
6
Q
How did British involvement in India lead to the final collapse of the Mughal Empire?
A
- The rise of British power played a decisive role in the fall of the Mughal Empire.
- Initially coming as traders in 1600, the British took advantage of the declining empire to expand their control.
- Using superior military power, effective administration, and tactics like the Subsidiary Alliance and Doctrine of Lapse, they gradually annexed large parts of India.
- Their army was better trained, better equipped, and supported by a powerful navy and industrial infrastructure from Britain.
- By 1803, they had taken control of Delhi and placed Mughal Emperor Shah Alam under their protection, effectively ending the Mughal Empire’s power.