Dilapd Flashcards

(7 cards)

1
Q

Notice for reinstatement of alterations

A

Westminster city Council V HSBC bank=
Dilapidation schedule is considered to be a follow form of notice

the Dilapidations Protocol requires surveyors ‘to specifically identify in the schedule (where appropriate) any notices served by the landlord requiring reinstatement works to be undertaken’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you consider off something odd a chattel

A

Consider whether it can be removed without doing damage to the property or itself. Damage = probs fixture.

Degree of annexation

Why it was attached (permanent alteration or improvement to the property = probs fixture)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Section 18 case law

A

Coldunell ltd v hotel management international limited 2022
Hotel was fully refurbished shortly before being let
Dimination in value was 1.3 million. The reasonable cost for remedial work was 600 K. The statutory Exceeded the cost of works so the landlord doesn’t entitled to the latter info.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the civil procedure rules?

A

A series of rules for the conduct of civil litigation

To encourage parties to avoid gives judges the power to impose sanctions on parties who have behaved unreasonably

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of break clause

A

Reasonable: some leeway. Consider landlords ability to relent the property without delay/ expenditure. FITZROY HOUSE V FINANCIAL TIMES: tenant completed works. LL said no we’re keeping you in, you missed some stuff. Judge said no: there were only trivial breaches.
Substantial/ Material: interchangeable. Treat is as absolute
Absolute: unbreakable
VP: free of chattels, people, interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are you aware of any recent dilapidations cases

A

Peachside Limited V Lee & Keung

End of lease. Ll sought damages for dilapidations. Condition described as warzone with grease

Tried to enforce repairing obligations in two phases.

  1. put the premises back into a lettable state.
  2. Redevelop the premises into an office space.

T argued LL intention was to get dilaps money.

is the dilapidations claim justified,? Was the landlords intention to read develop to an office genuine?

COURT RULED; LL wins (except for acgoods lift - you don’t need this in an office!!) £5ook settlement.
“ the premises in repair would command a reasonable rental for office accommodation”

S18 valuation diff not reduce the damage is recoverable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What would a landlords option be if a tenant was not complying with lease terms mid-lease

A

Section 146 notice under law of property act 1925.

Informs tenant of breach & allows time for them to remedy in reasonable time. If they don’t LL can seek

-forfeiture (remember not to accept rent!)
-damages
-specific performance

Limited by leasehold property repairs act … (if lease 7 years+ 3 years unexpired)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly