essay plans Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

teleological vs. deontological

A

focus on Kant vs. situation ethics

teleological, situational vs. deontological, absolutist

love vs. duty

6 props vs. ci

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cis always lead to moral decisions

A

deontological, duty
1st ci
2nd ci

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Kantian ethics is the most helpful approach to moral decision ,making regarding business ethics

A

deontological emphasis on duty vs. hedonism, higher/lower pleasures (CSR)

1st ci vs. hedonic calculus (whistleblowing)

2nd ci vs. singer (globalisation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

assess aquinas view of conscience

A

ratio and synderesis
marks us out from other beings
imago dei
fall, however rule of syneresis = orientated to good. have innate knowledge
can get it wrong = apparent gods
must educate reason through church teachings and divine law

conscientia
2 parts of conscience 
deriving 2nd p and applying them
consicientia = decision made 
prudence 

ignorance
vincible
invincible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

everyone knows what good means

A

ethical naturalism

emotivism

intuitionism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the end justifies thee means

A

SE

util and bentham

util and mill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ethical system with no clear absolute results in antinomianism

A

NL, reason

Kant, duty

SE, love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

act vs. rule util/mill vs. bentham

A

quantity vs. qual

human rights vs. no human rights

act vs. rule, case study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

consequences > rules

A

PP vs. HC
CIs vs. 6 props
mill uses both consequences and rules with weak rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

success I achieving telos is best basis

A

NL, telos with god
kant and duty, achieving duty
SE, achieving love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

double effect and justifying euthanasia?

A

act cannot be bad in itself

good consequences must outweigh bad

proportionately good reason to permit evil act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

deontological vs/ teleological

A

general kant vs. general situation
reason vs love
PPs vs. 6 props

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

kant = ben approach to business

A

deontological/reason vs. teleo/pleasure
1st ci vs. HC
2nd CI vs. Singer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

companies have no duty to be ethical

A

friedman
CSR
globalisation and externalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

CSR is meaningless

A

friedman
reputation
duty to recognise impact of business, externalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

capitalism can only lead to evil

A

globalisation. can but should recognise duty and externalities
friedman, trickle down economics
CSR

17
Q

good ethics = useless for business

A

friedman

CSR, better reputation

USP, positive financial impact

18
Q

globalisation can only be good

A
free market economy, stimulates trade (h.. wage gap)
interdependency, spread of new ideas (h... externalities)
cheap labour (h... exploitation)
19
Q

sanctity of life is most important

A

sofL
bible
aquinas

q of l
singer
flecther

personhood
selling
warren

20
Q

a person should have autonomy over life

A

quality of life, singer/mill
weak sanctity of life, flether
personhood, warren

21
Q

sanctity of life has no relevance

A

strong sofl, bible, rcc, aquinas
weak sofl, fletcher
q of l is best

22
Q

love is most important, yes

A

SE, personhood and love
NL, sofl, reason
QofL, love, singer

23
Q

NL is too inflexible for Ruth

A

deontological and reason
double effect
PP

24
Q

passive is the same as active

A

no, SofL, RCC, double effect
yes, weak sofL
yes, qofl/persohood

25
sofl vs. qofl
general nl vs. se case study
26
conscience is nothing but superego
freud aquinas fromm is mid way
27
aquinas vs. freud
conscience = derive from reason. verb. syndereiss/conscientia vs. does to exist, super ego, reflection of upbringing guilt prudence, ignorance vs. father figure, guilt follows us in adulthood due to fear of authority god, ratio, god given vs. no god, sex. prehistoric ancestors e.g. primal horde. psychosexual stages, fixations
28
RE views on sexual ethics are outdate
homo general synod lev 20 preamrital cofe John sentamu extramarital ex 20 natural law
29
SE and sexual ethics
teleological vs. NL deont (extramarital) love vs. pleasure (premarital) props vs. cis (homo)
30
NL and sexual ethics
deontology vs. teleological, fletcher (extramarital) reason and nature vs. Bentham and mill (homo) PPs vs. CIs (premarital)
31
kant and sexual
deontology vs. teleological, fletcher (premarital) duty vs. pleasure (extramarital) Cis vs. pp (homo)
32
util and sex
teleological vs. pp deontology extramarital HC vs. love premarital h/l vs. CIs homo
33
human nature = orientated towards good
NL freud, guilt. construction of society Dawkins, evolution
34
is agape religious
agape n bible fletcher, synonymous to Aristotle flourish. 6 props case study, mrs bergemier. adultery is not RE