Exam 2 Flashcards
(76 cards)
Two kinds of argument:
Those trying to prove or demonstrate a conclusion
Those trying to support a conclusion
Arguments that try to DEMONSTRATE a conclusion include schemes like these:
All As are Bs, No Bs are Cs, No As are Cs.
If P then Q, Not-Q, Not-P
Arguments that try to SUPPORT a conclusion include
Generalizing
Reasoning by analogy
Reasoning about cause and effect
RHETORIC
The art of PERSUASION
Ridicule/Sarcasm
âObama made a great spontaneous speech last night. Good thing his teleprompter didnât break down.â
Hyperbole
(hype; exaggeration)
âIs Deborah generous? Sheâd give you her life savings if she thought you were in need.â
Euphemism
(makes it sound better)
âcollateral damageâ; âsleeping aroundâ
Dysphemism
(makes it sound worse)
âjunk foodâ; âgeezerâ
Stereotype
positive or negative) is a cultural belief or idea about a some groupâs attributes, usually simplified or exaggerated
âWhat did he expect marrying her? Sheâs just a dumbblond.â
Proofsurrogate
Suggesting there is a reason to believe something without giving that reason
âClearly she shouldnât have done that.â
Downplayer
âPornography is a problem, but we must protect free speech.â
âThese self-appointed experts on the environment are just trying to scare us.â
Downplayers, just as it sounds, are used to play down or diminish importance
Innuendo
To use innuendo is to insinuate something derogatory.
âI didnât say Bush invaded Iraq to help his buddies in the oil industry. I just said his buddies have done very well since the invasion.â
Loaded question
Rests on an assumption that should have been established but wasnâtâWhen did you stop cheating on your girl friend?â
Weaseler
Wording used to protect a claim from criticism by weakening or qualifying it
âThis may cure your problem.â
What is a fallacy?
An argument that doesnât really support or prove what it is supposed to support or prove
Whatâs a relevance fallacy?
An argument that is not really relevant to its conclusion
âYou tell me itâs dangerous to text when Iâm driving, but I have seen you doing it.â
Argumentum ad hominem
If a speaker or writer attempts to dismiss someoneâs position by discussing the person rather than attacking his or her position, a fallacy is committed
âAccording to Al Gore, global warming is the most serious threat facing us today. Folks, what a crock. Al Gore spends $20,000 each year on electricity in his Tennessee mansion!â
Abusive ad hominem
âWhat Al Gore says about air pollution is a joke! That clown will say anything to get attention!â
The speaker is simply bad-mouthing Mr. Gore.
Circumstantial ad hominem
âWhat Al Gore says about air pollution is pure bull. Al Gore makes a fortune from alternative energy investments. What do you think heâd say?â
Inconsistency ad hominem
âSenator Clinton says we should get out of Iraq. What a bunch of garbage coming from her! She voted for the war, donât forget.â
POISONING THE WELL
Trying to dismiss what someone is going to say, by talking about his/her character or circumstances or consistency.
âSenator Clinton is going to give a talk tonight on Iraq. Well, itâs just gonna be more baloney. That gal will say anything to get a vote.â
Guilt by association
âYou think waterboarding is torture? That sounds like something these left-wing college professors would say.â
Listeners are supposed to think calling waterboarding torture is âguiltyâ by virtue of its alleged association with supposedly left-wing college professors.
GENETIC FALLACY
Rejecting an idea because it came from a presumed defective source.
A fallacy that occurs when someone argues that the origin of a contention in and of itself automatically renders it false
âDoes God exist? Of course not. That idea originated with a bunch of ignorant people who knew nothing about science.â
STRAW MAN
We are witnessing a Straw Man fallacy when a speaker or writer attempts to dismiss a contention by distorting or misrepresenting it
âTwenty percent? You want to tip her 20%???? Hey, maybe you want to give her everything we make, but I frankly think that is ridiculous!â