Final ch.17, 7, 18, 24-25 Flashcards
(89 cards)
Ch. 17 Plate tectonics
Plate tectonics - scientific theory that describes the large-scale motion of Earth’s lithosphere - theory that Earth’s outer shell is divided into several plates that glide over the mantle
- For centuries, scientists (usually shunned for doing so) have claimed that earth’s crust is “dynamic”
- –Continental drift –> plate tectonics
Brief timeline of continental drift
Brief timeline • 1564 - Ortelius - First modern atlas • 1858 - Antonio Snider-Pelligrini ○ Catastrophism ○ Noah's flood ○ Fossils ○ Not popular ○ Shape and "fit" of the continents was initial evidence • 1908 - Frank Taylor ○ Fit is enhanced by fitting continental shelf at the break and not the shore line
Continental drift
Wegner (1880-1930) - meteorologist who started a revolution
- -The predecessor to modern plate tectonics
- Hypothesis due to similar shapes and fossils
- -Made continental drift maps in 1915 of Pangea - “not widely accepted”
evidence for continental drift
Paleoclimate
- -Evidence of extreme climate changes as compared to the present
- —Coal deposits in Antarctica
- —-Evidence from: evaporates, Eolian deposits, coral reefs, glaciation (300Mya)
Paleontological
- –Similar fossils on opposite sides of Atlantic ocean
- – Plants and animals
- Glossopteris on all southern continents (largest and most well known extinct ferns)
- – No mechanism to transport them across the ocean
- -Ancient Mosasaurs habitat (fossils in BOTH South America and Africa on opposite sides…where it would have split) - like a mini lizard crocodile
- –Permian freshwater reptiles
Rock types and structures
- –Distinct rocks on both sides of the ocean
- -Cape fold belt and equivalent - S. Africa and —Appalachian Mtns. And equivalent - US, Canada, Scotland and Norway
- –Only occur in rocks > 145 Mya
development of plate tectonic theory
Wegener’s theory received?
- -“less bound by restrictions or tied down by awkward, ugly facts than most of its rival theories” - its appeal lies in the fact that it has few restrictive rules
- -“author offers no direct proof of its verity” - “Facts and principles opposed to it have been ignored”
- -“it is an impossible hypothesis!!”
- Original evidence for the CONTINENTAL DRIFT was from the continents
- Tech. advances in 1950s and 60s allowed for investigation of sea floor
- Geophysics and paleomagnetism provided new data
- Seafloor spreading proposed by Hess in 1962 - considered new data on ocean floor
geology of ocean floor
Topography of the ocean basins
- –Basins are divided by a large ridge system
- – Ridge system is continuous around the entire globe
- –Central rift valley within the ridge
Physical properties
- –Composed of basalt
- -Younger and thinner than most continental rocks
- –No evidence of crustal deformation - FOLDED MOUNTAINS
Seafloor spreading proposed 1960 - Hess
- Proposed mechanisms
- Mantle convection
- –Rifting and volcanism along ridge system
- -Continents pushed along –Recycling of oceanic crust by subduction
Polar wandering
- –Earth’s north magnetic pole moved
- –Polar wandering paths varied by continent
- –But multiple poles are not possible
Magnetic reversals
- –Earth’s magnetic field polarity has reversed through time
- –Normal polarity - N(magnetic) = N(geographic)
- –Reversed polarity - N(magnetic) = S(geographic)
- -At least 12 reversals in last 4 million years
Vine and Matthews (1963) tested Hess’s hypothesis using magnetism
- -Magnetic polarity reversals recorded in ocean floor
- –Magma cools forming new crust
- –Polarity at time of cooling preserved
Magnetic polarity stripes in ocean crust parallel ridges
- –Symmetrical on either side of the ridge
- –Give age of seafloor
- -Rates of plate motion may be calculated
- –Youngest sediments resting directly on basalt near the ridge
- –Sediment just above the basalt gets older moving away from the ridge
- -Accumulation rates of approx. 3 mm per 1000 years
Plate boundaries - divergent
Plate margins --Lithosphere divided into plates ---Structural features, not land and ocean ---Ridges, trenches and mountains --- Not permanent
DIVERGENT PLATE BOUNDARIES
- -plate splits and pulls apart - almost all are submerged under sea
- -zone of spreading —> rifting and continent splits
- -As continents separate, new oceanic crust and lithosphere is formed and ocean bsin becomes wider
- -tensional stresses that produce NORMAL FAULTS along margins of separating plates - magma injected up, cools and becomes part of moving plates
- -some of most active VOLCANIC areas on earth
- -Mid-Atlantic ridge
–Oceanic-oceanic crust
○ Mid-oceanic ridge with central rift valley
○ Surface covered with lava flows and pillow basalts
○ Fissures are parallel the ridge axis
○ Hydrothermal vents form chimney structure
○ Unique ecological community
—Continental-continental crust
○ Rift valley
§ East African Rift valley
○ Causes sea floor spreading as the plates diverge across
○ Forms a Mid-ocean ridge
convergent plate margins
plates collide and one moves down into the mantle - lots of igneous activity - earthquakes, metamorphism, mountain building
Oceanic-oceanic
- – Volcanoes in an ISLAND arc
- –Japan
- -one is thrust under called SUBDUCTION - marked by deep sea trench - into asthenosphere where heated and absorbed into mantle
Oceanic-continental
- -Subduction zone
- -Volcanoes in a –Cascade range
- -lighter crust resists subduction and overrides oceanic plate - may form mtn. belt - roots with magma
Continental-continental
- –Intensely folded/faulted mountain belts
- –Metamorphic rocks dominate
- Igneous rocks included
- -neither can subside into mantle…makes high mountain range - Himalayan man.
transform fault margins
Transform faults are large vertical fractures or faults in the crust
- -zones of SHEARING plates slide past without creating or destroying lithosphere
- -occur along transform fault - which is strike-slip fault btwn plates - movement is horizontal and parallel to fault
- Movement is side to side
- –May extend for long distances
- –In oceanic crust, deep valleys are formed
- –May extend onto continents
- -San Andreas Fault (California)
Volcanic hotspots in Hawaii - Yellowstone - Bermuda
plate motion - rates and mechanisms
wo ways to look at plate motion
- Relative velocity - the movement of one plate relative to another
- Absolute velocity - compares plate movement to a fixed position
- –Hotspots
Tectonic mechanisms - convection of heat from the core and mantle drives tectonics
- -Layering at 660 km
- –Convection of heat from the core and mantle drives tectonics
- –Slab pull
- –Ridge push
reading key points - ch. 17
- -Transform plate boundary connecting the Caribbean trench with the Middle Am. trench - on order is ridges and valleys, high plateaus, grabens, and volcanoes
- –Theory of continental drift was proposed in early 1900s and supported by geological evidence - lack of knowledge of nature of oceanic crust prevented the complete theory to be developed
Major breakthrough in development of plate tectonics theory occurred in 1960 when the topography of the ocean floors was mapped and magnetic and seismic characteristics of oceanic crust were determined
pt. 2 reading key points - ch. 17
Most tectonic activity occurs along plate boundaries
Direction of relative motion of plates is indicated by
- –A trend of the oceanic ridge —Seismic data
- –Magnetic stripes on the seafloor
- –Ages of chains of volcanic islands and seamounts
- –The motion of a plate is described in terms of rotation around a pole
- –Heat from the mantle (generated by radioactivity) and from the core is probably the fundamental cause of Earth’s internal convection
The major forces acing on plates are
○ Slab-pull
○ Ridge-push
○ Basal drag
○ Friction along transform faults and subduction zones
○ Most imp. Are slab-pull and ridge push in making plates move
continental drift
Theory considered as profound as Darwin of biology and Copernicus with the sun as center
—Predecessor of plate tectonic theory was continental drift - after world maps were created, Scientists could see continents (S Am. And Africa) that fit together like puzzle - Antonia Snider-Pelligrini put continents together - also looked at fossil evidence I N Am. And Europe that were on opposite sides like they had been together
Alfred Wegener, German - was first to seriously investigate theory of continental drift - based on shapes of continents and geologic fossil evidence in Brazil and Africa - he drew map of three stages beg. With large mass called Pangaea (“all land”)
- –He thought less dense silicic continental rock plowed through denser rocks of ocean floor driven by forces related to rotation of the earth
- –Most rejected his idea - some geologic evidence supported
paleontological evidence for continental drift
- –Fossils of land animals were found on both sides of Atlantic…would be unable to cross so must have been connected
- –Specifically fossils of Glossopteris, a fernlike plant found in rocks of same age from S Am., S Africa, India and Antarctica - could not have been transported by wind bc too large
- –Also reptile Lystrosaurus - same period - S continents, Antarctica, Asia
- –Also geologic factors end abruptly at coast of one continent and cont. at another facing across Atlantic - folded mountain ranges at Cap of Good Hope at S tip of Africa appear in similar age and style near Buenos Aires, Argentina - folded Appalachian mountains also (E US and similar in Ireland, Scotland, Norway)
During latter part of Paleozoic Era (300M years ago), glaciers covered continents in S Hemisphere and all continents show evidence of glaciation - however, today all continents except Antarctica are near equator where glaciation could never occur
- –Glaciers cannot occur in the ocean, they originate on land and move toward edge of continents!…so bc there is evidence of glaciation on various continents…they must have been anciently concentrated in one area
- –Coal in Antarctica shows that abundant plant life once was there - now covered in ice
Just lots of evidence of climate change (due to moving) in the salt, rocks, reefs
- –Wegener was criticized bc he failed to explain what forces would permit continents of granite to plow through oceans of rock - theory was not developed further until WWII
- –Theory - continents grouped together at end of PALEOZOIC ERA
developing theory of plate tectonics
Continental drift theory was supported…but diff. to accept completely bc no effective way to study the ocean floor - Early 1960s bc new instruments allowed scientists to map the topography of the ocean floor and study it
—Echo-sounding devices to study ocean floor topography - revealed several ocean basins are divided by a great ridge…65,000 km long - at the crest of the ridge is a central valley which is a rift valley that is splitting apart under tension (LONGEST MOUNTAIN RANGE ON THE PLANET)
Showed diff. btwn continental and oceanic crust - ocean crust is YOUNGER and THINNER, composed of basalt…so diff. composition than granite continental crust - oceanic crust not folded mountain structures so not subjected to strong compressional forces putting weight on the crust
—1960, Hess proposed theory of seafloor spreading using echo soundings data and continental drift theory
Argued they are spreading apart by convection currents in the mantle - moving away from oceanic ridge and towards deep-sea trenches where oceanic crust descends back into the mantle and is reabsorbed - spreading produces fractures in crust where magma from mantle shoots up to become new oceanic crust (ocean floor is regenerated every 200-300 M years)
Paleomagnetism
Earth has internally generated magnetic field - magnet with N and S magnetic pole
- –Electromagnetic/dynamo theory - outer core of liquid iron convects and the motion generates electrical currents that establish a magnetic field
- –Began by studying rocks - basalt is rich in iron and becomes magnetized by earth’s magnetic field as they cool
- –The mineral grains therefore become “fossil” magnets to show orientation of earth’s magnetic field during time of cooling - preserve record of paleomagnetism
- –Also works in iron-oxide grains in sandstones of sedimentary rocks
These rocks show that earth’s north magnetic pole has steadily changed over time - N magnetic pole has moved Northward and Westward to where it is today
Poles moving throughout time
Most logical explanation is that there has always been only one magnetic pole that has been fixed, while the continents moved with respect to it –> paleomagnetism data supports theory of continental drift
- –Also studying magnetic properties of volcanic rock shows that polarity of earth’s magnetic field has reversed many times over history
- –Normal polarity - periods when magnetic field was oriented as it is today with N magnetic pole in N and close to current position
- –These periods have been followed by periods when locations of N magnetic pole and S were reversed - called reverse polarity, which began 2.5M years ago - present period of normal polarity began 780,000 years ago
Polarity chrons - the major intervals of alternating polarity (1M years apart)
—Used paleomagnetism to test Hess’s theory of seafloor spreading - thought that if it had occurred it would be recorded in the magnetism of basalts in oceanic crust
—If it had reversed, new basalt forming at the crest of oceanic ridge would be magnetized according to polarity at time it cooled - as ocean floor spreads it would show symmetrical series of magnetic stripes (alternating reverse and normal polarities)
○ Also imp. To note that patterns of magnetic stripes on the ocean, on either side of ridge, match the patterns found in a sequence of recent basalts on continents (shown in continental rocks too)
Compelling evidence that seafloor is spreading and of continental drift
– Imp. Bc help determine age of seafloor and measure rates of plate movement
evidence from sediment on ocean floor
Some of most convincing evidence for plate tectonics comes from recent drilling in sediment on ocean floor - deep sea drilling project starting in 1968 with Glomar Challenger ship
- –Confirms conclusions from paleomagnetism studies by samples of fossils accumulated on diff. portions of ocean floor
- –Similar to predictions of plate tectonics theory - the YOUNGEST sediment resting on basalt of ocean floor is near oceanic ridge, where new crust is created - older rocks also thicker!
Away from ridge, becomes progressively older - oldest near coast of continents - the oldest rocks on ocean floor are 200M years old but continental crust rocks can be 3.8B years old
—Certain types of sediment increase floor spreading - plankton can only survive in warm, nutrient rich water near equator - when they die, their skeletons create layer of soft, white chalk on seafloor - but have found evidence of chalk layer north of today’s equator in Pacific…evidence seafloor has spread
plate geography
Plate boundaries reflect earth’s internal dynamics - are most significant geologic elements - to understand their location, have to pay attention to earth’s structural features
—ectonic plates - earth’s outer rigid lithosphere is divided into 7 major plates and several smaller sub-plates
○ Major plates outlines by oceanic ridges, trenches, and young mountain systems
○ Pacific, Eurasian, N American, S American, African, Australian, Antarctic plates
§ Continents are not moving separately from oceanic crust…both parts are moving lithospheric plates that extend into mantle
○ Largest is Pacific plate, covers 1/5 of earth’s surface and mostly composed of oceanic crust - other large plates contain both oceanic and continental crust
Indiv. Plates are in constant motion and cont. change in size and shape - plates without continental crust can be completely consumed in subduction zones
Plate boundaries
–Plates move together - if one part moves, the whole plate moves - nearly all major tectonic activity occurs along plate boundaries
plate motion
So rotation around imaginary axis
— Plate 1 moves around the axis AR (Axis of plate rotation), one pole of which is the point P (pole of rotation)
Diff. parts of a plate move at diff. velocities - max. velocity near equator of rotation and min. velocity at poles of rotation - pole would have zero velocity bc it is a fixed point around which the plate moves - gets higher as reaches equator
Direction of movement is determined multiple ways
- –Trends of oceanic ridge and transform faults are related to location of pole of rotation
- –Pacific plate is moving NW direction - bordered by several small plates of subduction zones
IMP: plate margins are not fixed but can moves as much as plates themselves - Antarctica and Africa plates are enlarged as new lithosphere generated but no subduction zones so ridges are moving outward
—If 2 divergent plate boundaries are not separated by subduction zone - new lithosphere is formed so have o spread and move apart
rates of plate motion
Rates determines in 2 ways
—Think of 2 cars driving 50 km/hr - their relative velocity is 100 km/hr but compared to your fixed position, cars have an absolute velocity of 50 km/hr
- Relative velocity - compares the movement of one plate with respect to another plate
- -To determine need to know
- –Transform faults show direction of movement - Absolute velocity - compares plate movement to a fixed reference frame
- – If we assume that hotspots are stationary, then the tracks of hotspot volcanoes are tangible records of a plate’s absolute velocity and its direction of movement
- –Can be measured directly using satellites and lasers
- –The velocities and directions measured are complementary records of plate movement - plates are moving at diff. rates
- –Think of relative movement of Africa with respect to Europe
- –Relative movement -Europe is S towards Africa since separated by subduction zone
However, absolute motion of both plates is Northward - Europe is moving slower than Africa so a convergent margin has developed btwn them
Fastest moving plates have a large plate of the plate boundary as a subduction zone - slower moving plates lack subduction boundaries
driving mechanisms of plate tectonics
Ultimately energy that drives plate tectonics is heat transported out of hot core and mantle to earth’s surface - type of convection and result of earth’s effort to cool and reach thermal equilibrium
One of 1st models - convection cells within mantle carried plates - that plates played little or not active part in the convection
- -Convection mantle would cause lithosphere to split, and moving mantle would carry lithosphere toward subduction zone
- Distance btwn plate boundaries thought to be caused by size of convection cell
- –More successful model of convection theory says plates are active participants in convection process
- Lithosphere is cold upper layer of convection cell - bc of greater density, lithosphere sinks - subduction occurs not bc plate is pulled down by descending mantle but bc the plate becomes denser than the underlying asthenosphere
- –Upward flow from asthenosphere is caused by plates spreading
forces that influence motion of plates (PICTURE!) - Slab pull, ridge push
- Slab-pull
- –Pull exerted on plate as the dense oceanic slab descends under its own weight into asthenosphere in a subduction zone - slab sinks bc it is denser than the asthenosphere and it pulls the rest of the lithosphere with it
- –Major driving force!!! - bc inc. amt. of subduction zones = inc. velocity
- — Denser area (happens in Hawaii) sinks, bc cooler and denser, which pulls solid crust apart - large slabs of crust break and split, causes molten lava to rise from below and create zone of new cooling crust - Ridge-push
- –Gravity makes lithosphere slip off elevated edge
- –2nd most imp. Factor of tectonic plates -related to elevation of the ridge
- –Asthenosphere acts as slippery layer beneath the slab and lithosphere slides downhill