final exam Flashcards

(74 cards)

1
Q

self fulfilling prophecy and prejudice

A

individuals interact with members of out-group in ways that elicit expected (stereotypical) response

it perpetuates sterotypes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

confirmation bias

A

looking for things that confirm our expectation. don’t pay attention to things that dont even if theres evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

study with interviews and self fulfilling prophecies

A

had people interview white and black applicants

saw if there was a difference in the way they were interviewed.

people who gave interviews responded more coldly with minorities than with whites

taught research assistance cold interview with whites. half white applicants got cold style and half got warm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

subtyping

A

creating smaller subcategories of a schema in order to preserve an existing stereotype

“exceptions to the rule”

anytime people say “theyre different, they don’t count”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

attributions

A

finding the cause of something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ultimate attribution error

A

tendency to make more favorable attributions about members of ones own group than about members of the other group

ex-luck vs ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ultimate attribution error in minorities

A

we think that they make mistakes based on who we are.

we dont do this with in group members and are more likely to think reasons for actions is because of external environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

failure of logic

A

prejudice is based on emotion more than in logic. it can be hard to change using arguments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how to change prejudice, arguments or emotion?

A

you have to target emotional side

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

automatic component

A

thinking and feeling that is nonconscious, unintentional, involuntary and effortless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

controlled component

A

thinking and feeling that is conscious, unintentional, voluntary and effortful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

stereotype threat and how it works

A

its from perspective of the victim

because they know stereotype about group, it puts pressure to show stereotype is not true

this anxiety may cause lower performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

stereotype threat

A

apprehension experienced by members of a group that their behavior may confirm stereotype

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

stereotype threat and gre verbal test study

A

one test said that it is a genuine test of verbal abilities and limitations.
-black students performed worse

another said they were researching difficult verbal problems
-white and black students then perform the same.

the second part of the study had the verbal problem intro but primed race before hand
-blacks did worse. they answered fewer problems. they also reported more anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

other studies of stereotype threat

A

gender and math performance

race and athleticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

stereotype threat effects those who..

A

have strong identity to whatever is being tested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why do we obey

A

Normative social influence
Informational social influence
Self justification/dissonance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Normative social influence

A

We look at others to see if they approve or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Informational social influence

A

Motivated by social cognition. If in a confusing situation, we turn to the “expert”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Self justification dissonance with Milligan study

A

When giving a shock, we say things that make us feel less bad

People don’t skip all the way up the board. They do it button by button

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Propinquity effect

A

Select friendships based off of people around you

The more we see and interact with people, the more likely they are to become our friends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

West gate west study

A

Asked who best friends were within complex.

42% of people chose next door neighbor

Those who were most popular lived in “functional distance”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Functional distance

A

Convenient places we go to a lot. Ex-mailbox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Mere exposure effect

A

The more exposure we have to something, the more positively we are to react to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Mere exposure effect and evolution
Unknown can be dangerous Familiarity might show similarity
26
What are the issues with evolutionary theory
Doesn’t consider cultural influence (If we don’t find differences within culture, it may be evolutionary ) Doesn’t take into consideration LGBTQ
27
Social exchange theory
Reason we interact with people and environment is because we expect to give and receive
28
How to predict satisfaction within relationships
Perceived rewards Perceived cost Comparison level
29
Comparison level
Expectations about level of rewards and cost in a relationship If what we need is equal to or succeeds that idea, we will be more satisfied (Average ratio is 5/2)
30
Low comparison level
Expect high cost and low reward Why people may stay in bad relationships
31
Investment model
Predicts commitment (if we see the relationship will last) Has factors of commitment
32
Factors of commitment in investment model
Satisfaction Investment (if we invest a lot, we are more likely to stay) Alternatives
33
Why may we skip out on satisfying relationships
Not a lot of investment If we think we can do better Ex-we may be satisfied with a job but a good offer comes up and there’s more pay/benefits
34
Definition of pro social behavior
Any act performed with the goal of benefiting another person
35
Altruism
Helping without expectations | It may not exist because we have good feelings from helping others
36
Evolutionary psych and helping
Kin selection Inclusive fitness
37
Kin selection
Behaviors that are helpful to genetic similars are favored because you’re helping your own dna
38
Inclusive fitness
Helping dna of Brice or nephew
39
Study of helping DNA in life or death situation
Immediate relatives Distant relatives Non relatives
40
Social norm of helping
It’s expected that we will help others out
41
Evolution and social rules
Those who learn social rules are more likely to survive
42
Norm of reciprocity
Expectation that helping others will increase the likelihood that we will receive help in the future When we are given something, we feel the need to give back
43
Study examining the likelihood of helping behavior after receiving a favor...(raffle)
One group didn’t get soda, another did, and the other was given by experimenter When the confederate (person who asked for tickets) gave drink, the person gave more tickets
44
Norm is social responsibility
Obligation to help those who depend on us for aid
45
Norm of social justice
Rules about equality, fairness and the just distribution of resources Ex-limitations on welfare (providing help if it’s deserved)
46
Social exchange theory
Examines the rewards and cost of helping
47
Rewards in social exchange theory
It increases likelihood of receiving help
48
Mood management in social exchange theory
We can help as a strategy to manage ones mood and likelihood of helping based off mood
49
Study that regards manipulating mood and likelihood of helping
Given cookie or not (people who were in better mood were more likely to help) Pay phone and helping pick stuff up (people who found dime were more likely to help)
50
Why do mood body increase likelihood to help?
Increases sympathy Elicits and prolongs good mood Good moods increase self awareness (ignoring person who needs help could cause cognitive dissonance)
51
Relief of personal distress
Observers of suffering help in order to relieve their own personal distress
52
Negative state relief hypothesis
Feeling bad about oneself and then helping to relieve some of that distress, even if it’s not related
53
High cost related to decrease in help
``` Physical endangerment Don’t have cognitive resources Don’t have time Social stigma/social approval Money Shame/embarrassment ```
54
Cost benefit ratio
Benefits of help (low would be donating to little league. High would be donating to American cancer society) Low-sit at donation desk High-collect door to door
55
Who is more likely to help regardless of cost
Happy people
56
Sadness and likelihood to help
They only help when cost are low
57
Gender difference and pro social behavior
Men are more likely to help on herioic ways, more likely to help strangers Women help in more nurturing ways . They’re more likely to help friends
58
Cultural differences and helping
In both independent and interdependent cultures, they are more likely to help in group members People in interdependent cultures are less likely to help out group members
59
Urban overload hypothesis
Idea that people living in cities are bombarded with stimulation and Jeep to themselves in order to keep from overload
60
Bystander effect
The greater the number of vista fees, the less likely they are to help Why? Diffusion of responsibility Or plurastic ignorance
61
Pluralistic ignorance
Phenomenon where bystanders assume that nothing is wrong with an emergency because no one else looks concerned
62
Prejudice
Affective How we feel
63
Stereotypes
Cognitive What we think
64
Discrimination
Behavioral How we behave toward x
65
Negative behavior directed against people because of their membership to a particular group
Discrimination
66
Prejudice
Overall attitude Negative feelings toward others based solely on membership in a different group
67
Social categorization
Classification of people into groups basis of common attributes
68
Social identity theory
Personal identity -> self esteem Need for self esteem Social identities ->group achievements and group serving biases
69
Social identity theory calculates
Self esteem
70
Parts of group serving biases
In group favoritism Assumed similarity effect Out group homogeneity effect
71
Out group homogeneity effect
Belief that all members of an out group are all alike
72
Out group serving biases
Negative evaluation/withhold resources Different from self All members are same Simple individuals
73
Minimal group paradigm
Found evidence of group serving biases
74
Stereotype maintenance
Illusionary correlation Confirmatory hypothesis testing Self fulfilling prophecy Subtyping Attributions Failure of logic