Forensic Psychology Flashcards
(110 cards)
top down
What is offender profiling
A tool used by police when solving crimes- with the main aim being to narrow down the field of enquiry and make a list of suspects by looking at the crime scene and evidence
top down
What is the top down approach
Originated from FBI
Used to solve the most severe violent cases by interviewing most serious sexually motivated killers including ted bundy and Charles Manson
Also referred to as ‘typology’ as offenders are organised into organised or disorganised offender categories
top down
What are characteristics LH organised offenders
Plan crime in advance
Precision
Highly controlled
Lack of evidence
Usually married
Socially sound
Above average intelligence
top down
What are some traits of disorganised offenders
Lack of planning
Evidence left
Low iq
Socially awkward
Usually unemployed
Little interest in crime
top down
What are the four main stages of constructing an FBI profile
Data assimilation- evidence is reviewed
Crime scene classification- see if organised or disorganised
Crime reconstruction- hypothesis of how crime happened
Profile generation- hypothesis about offender (stature/behaviour)
top down
What are the strengths of the top down approach?
Supporting evidence- Canter looked at 100 US serial killings by using a ‘smallest space analysis’ which matched characteristics to crimes which matched the FBI typologies
Good generalisability- Meketa (2017) found that in 3 US states there has been an increase of 85% in solving burglaries using top down approach. categories of interpersonal and opportunistic made for this
top down
What are the weaknesses of the top down approach
contrast- Godwin argued that many criminals overlapped categories. suggests organised or disorganised typology is more of a continuum
Low internal validity- canter argues that the sample used of 36 serial killers was too niche and they were all interviewed using unstructured interviews so all questions were different and not comparable. all committed at least two murders and 25 committed multiple
bottom up
What is the bottom up approach
‘British approach’
Uses past data from similar crimes to build a picture of an offender. Investigators will look at crime scene and compare to similar ones in the past. Does not use typologies and is ‘data driven’
bottom up
What are the two main components of the bottom up approach
Investigative psychology
Geographical profiling
bottom up
What is investigative psychology
Compare a currently investigated crime scene to those of the past to find out the type of person that committed the crime by establishing patterns of behaviour
bottom up
What are the three main parts of investigative psychology
Interpersonal coherence- the way the offender behaves at the scene and how they ‘interact’ with the victim
Significance of time and place- shows where the offender is living
Forensic awareness- see how mindful they are of covering their tracks, can show if they have been investigated before
bottom up
What is geographical profiling
Based on spatial consistency
An offenders operational base and never crime locations can be discovered through previous crimes
bottom up
What are the three main parts of geographical profiling
Spatial consistency- people commit crimes within a limited space
Crime mapping- maps previous crimes to find base of criminal
Modus operandi- a particular way of method or doing something
bottom up
Wag are the two types of geographical criminal and what does this mean
Marauder- operates close to home base
Commuter- travels distance from usual residence
bottom up
What are the strengths of the bottom up approach
Supporting evidence- Gary Copson surveyed 48 police departments and bottom up approach was deemed useful in 83% of cases
Supporting evidence- Ludigran and Canter investigated 120 murder cases and found that where killers disposed of bodies formed a circle around their home base, this was more noticeable in marauders. supports canters circle theory
bottom up
What are the weaknesses of the bottom up approach
Mixed results- Copson found that bottom up approach lead to identification of offender in only 3% of cases in 48 police departments surveyed
Significant failures- Rachel nickell was killed and sexually assaulted in Wimbledon park. Colin Stagg was suspect and tracked for 5 months. Case closed due to lack of evidence. Robert Napper arrested 16 years later and had been dismissed prior due to being taller than description of killer
historic explanations
What is atavistic from
An early biological explanation which suggests criminals are subspecies or genetic throwbacks. That rate distinguishable by facial and cranial features
historic explanations
What was Lombroso’s research
Studied over 4000 skulls of dead and alive criminals and concluded 40% of crimes could be accounted for by atavistic characteristics
historic explanations
What are some criminal characteristics?
Narrow, sloping brow
High cheekbones
Facial asymmetry
Dark skin
Prominent jaw
Extra toes, nipples and fingers
historic explanations
What is a Strength of atavism
Changed criminal psychology- Hollin described Lombroso as ‘The father of modern criminology’ This was because he moved crime research towards more scientific measures. Also shows links to offender profiling.
historic explanations
What are the limitations of atavistic explanations
Poorly controlled- lombroso did not compare criminal samples with control non criminal sample so he could not control confounding variables, such as class.
Bad implications- Delisl and other critics have shown how there were racist undertones in Lombroso’s work. For example criminals having curly hair and dark skin.
contradictory evidence- Goring studied 3000 criminals and 3000 non crimi9nals and found no correlation between cranial features and crime
biological explanations
What was Lange’s research into genetic explanations for offending
Studied 17 MZ twins and 13 DZ twins where one of the twins had served time in prison.
Found that 10 of the MZ twins and only 2 of the DZ twins had both spent time in prison
biological explanations
What was Christiansen’s research into genetic explanations for offending
Studied over 3500 twins between 1880 and 1910
Found concordance rates of 35% of MZ twins and found 13% for DZ twins
biological explanations
What did Tiihonen discover about candidate genes
Found that 5-10% off all severe violent crimes in Finland could be attributed to the MAOA and CDH13 genes.
Individuals with both genes were 13x more likely to have a history of violent behaviour.