forensic psychology Flashcards
(67 cards)
atavistic form
an approach to explaining criminal behaviour historically. this theory suggests criminal behaviour could be a result of genes, and therefore some individuals were pre disposed to commit crimes. this theory further claimed to be able to identify criminals from the shape of their skull, and criminals were more primitive due to their inclination to commit crimes
cognitive distortions
faulty cognitions that lead to irrational thoughts
custodial sentencing
hostile attribution bias
a form of cognitive distortion which may explain some criminal behaviour. this when a person interprets someone else’s behaviour as hostile. e.g. thinking someone is giving you a glare when there not their just looking at you.
minimalisation
another form of cognitive distortions where offenders reduce the severity of their crimes . for example using phrases like” they were asking for it “ instead of rape.
eysenck’s theory of criminal personality
This theory suggest that criminal behaviour was a result of certain personality traits
introversion / extroversion E
neuroticism /stability N
he later addeda third dimension to the existing model
biological basis of behaviour-eysenck believed that personality traits are biological in origin and stem from the nervous system we inherit
offender profiling
profiliers aim to produce a description of an offender that can aid police in their search for criminals such as rapists , murderes and arsonists who commit serial crimes.
they do this by making links between the crime scene and the type of personw who may have comited the crime
Top-down approach Typological profiling
it’s described as a qualitive approach to offender profiling due to looking at the overall picture and using typologies. (types) organised vs disorganised based on crime scene characteristics.
the process:
data assimilation
data complied with police reports, post mortems crime scene photos etc
crime classification
profilers decide whether the crime scene is organised or disorganised
crime reconstruction
hypotheses about crime sequence , offender & victim behaviour etc
profile generation
offenders physical, demographic and behavioural characteristics.
limitation to top-down appraoch
only limited to explaining some crimes , top down profiling is best suited to crimes that reveal important details about the suspect, such as rape arson and cult killings as well as crimes that involve such disturbing practices such as sadistic torture, dissection, of the body and acting out fantasies. more common offences such as burglary and destruction of property ( or even murder or assault during the course of committing these) do not lend themselves to profiling because the resulting crime scene reveals very little about the offender. this shows that the top down approach can be used in some cases however can be limited to explaining all.
another limitation to top-down approach
there is a lack of evidence to support the ‘organised’ and ‘disorganised’ offfender david canter et al 2004 using a technique called smallest space analysis, nalysed data from 100 murders in the usa. the detailsof each case were examined with reference to 39 characteristics thought to be typical of organised and disorganised. Although the findings did indeed suggest evidence of a distinct organised type, this was not the case for disorganised which seems to undermine the classification system as a whole.
nevertheless, the organised/disorganised distinction is still used as a model for proffssional profilers in the us and has widespread support.
Bottom- up approach
A data-driven profiling method analysing crime scene evidence and patterns to build an offender profile without pre-established categories. it looks at even the minor details of the crime and develops a likely hypothesis about the likely characteristic of the offender. it is a British model
investigative psychology
attempts to apply statistical procedures , alongside theory to the analysis of the crime scene evidence. Patterns that occur or coexist across crime scene are used to generate data about the offender. It is based on psychological theory of matching behavioural patterns to generate data on the offender.
interpersonal coherence
people are consistent in their behaviour and therefore there will be links with elements of the crime and how they behave in everyday life.
significance of time and place
this may indicate where the offender is living if the crimes take place with the same forensic centre of gravity
forensic awareness
certain behaviours may reveal an awareness of particular police raining and past experiences e.g. wearing gloves Davies et al 1997 found that rapists who concealed finger prints often had previous convictions of burglary.
geographical profiling
analyses the spatial behaviour of a criminal. it looks at the different= locations of a connected series of crimes, the spatial relationship between different crimes and how they might relate to an offenders place of residence.
What’s circle theory ?
Proposes two models of offender behaviour. People operate within a limited spatial mindset that creates imagined boundaries in which crimes are likely to be committed.
Marauder
Offfender operates near their home base
Commuters
Offender is likely to have travelled a distance away from their usual residence.
Investigative psychology evidence
David and Rupert 1990 conducted an analysis of 66 sexual assault case. The data was examined using small space analysis several behaviours were identified as common in diffferent samples of behaviour such as the use of impersonal language and lack of reaction to the victim. It supports investigative psychology cause it shows behaviour that occur across crime scenes
Geographical profiling evidence
Samantha and David collected information from a 120 murder cases involving serial killers in the us. Smallest space analysis revealed spatial consistency in the behaviour of the killers. The location of each body disposal cite created a centre of gravity presumably because offenders start from their home base they may go in diffferent direction each time they dispose a body but in the end all the different sites create a circular effect around the home base.
Lombrosos research
Examined the facial and cranial features of hundreds of Italian convicts both living and deceased. Proposed that the atavistic form was associated with a number of physical anomalies which were key indicators of criminality. 40% of crime o acts could be accounted for by atavistic characteristic criminals : strong jawline a narrow sloping brow high cheekbones dark skin extras toes nipples or fingers
Murders - bloodshot eyes curly hair and long ears
Sexual deviants. - glinting eyes swollen fleshy lips
Fraudsters - thin reedy lips
Other non physical traits unemployment tattoos and use of criminal slang
Lombrosos reasearch shifted crime reasearch to a more scientific credible realm. Also in trying to describe how particular types of people are likely to commit particular types of crime
Scientific credible he examined living and deceased facial features and found 40% criminal activity could be accounted by atavistic characteristics
Delisi 2012 have drawn attention to racial undertones with his research.many features that Lombrosos identified as criminal and atavistI’d such as curly hair and dark skin are most likely to be found with people among African descent .
Limitation as reasearch is socially sensitive as it will offend those of ethnic minorities