forensic psychology Flashcards

(67 cards)

1
Q

atavistic form

A

an approach to explaining criminal behaviour historically. this theory suggests criminal behaviour could be a result of genes, and therefore some individuals were pre disposed to commit crimes. this theory further claimed to be able to identify criminals from the shape of their skull, and criminals were more primitive due to their inclination to commit crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

cognitive distortions

A

faulty cognitions that lead to irrational thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

custodial sentencing

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

hostile attribution bias

A

a form of cognitive distortion which may explain some criminal behaviour. this when a person interprets someone else’s behaviour as hostile. e.g. thinking someone is giving you a glare when there not their just looking at you.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

minimalisation

A

another form of cognitive distortions where offenders reduce the severity of their crimes . for example using phrases like” they were asking for it “ instead of rape.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

eysenck’s theory of criminal personality

A

This theory suggest that criminal behaviour was a result of certain personality traits
introversion / extroversion E
neuroticism /stability N
he later addeda third dimension to the existing model
biological basis of behaviour-eysenck believed that personality traits are biological in origin and stem from the nervous system we inherit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

offender profiling

A

profiliers aim to produce a description of an offender that can aid police in their search for criminals such as rapists , murderes and arsonists who commit serial crimes.
they do this by making links between the crime scene and the type of personw who may have comited the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Top-down approach Typological profiling

A

it’s described as a qualitive approach to offender profiling due to looking at the overall picture and using typologies. (types) organised vs disorganised based on crime scene characteristics.
the process:
data assimilation
data complied with police reports, post mortems crime scene photos etc
crime classification
profilers decide whether the crime scene is organised or disorganised
crime reconstruction
hypotheses about crime sequence , offender & victim behaviour etc
profile generation
offenders physical, demographic and behavioural characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

limitation to top-down appraoch

A

only limited to explaining some crimes , top down profiling is best suited to crimes that reveal important details about the suspect, such as rape arson and cult killings as well as crimes that involve such disturbing practices such as sadistic torture, dissection, of the body and acting out fantasies. more common offences such as burglary and destruction of property ( or even murder or assault during the course of committing these) do not lend themselves to profiling because the resulting crime scene reveals very little about the offender. this shows that the top down approach can be used in some cases however can be limited to explaining all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

another limitation to top-down approach

A

there is a lack of evidence to support the ‘organised’ and ‘disorganised’ offfender david canter et al 2004 using a technique called smallest space analysis, nalysed data from 100 murders in the usa. the detailsof each case were examined with reference to 39 characteristics thought to be typical of organised and disorganised. Although the findings did indeed suggest evidence of a distinct organised type, this was not the case for disorganised which seems to undermine the classification system as a whole.
nevertheless, the organised/disorganised distinction is still used as a model for proffssional profilers in the us and has widespread support.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bottom- up approach

A

A data-driven profiling method analysing crime scene evidence and patterns to build an offender profile without pre-established categories. it looks at even the minor details of the crime and develops a likely hypothesis about the likely characteristic of the offender. it is a British model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

investigative psychology

A

attempts to apply statistical procedures , alongside theory to the analysis of the crime scene evidence. Patterns that occur or coexist across crime scene are used to generate data about the offender. It is based on psychological theory of matching behavioural patterns to generate data on the offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

interpersonal coherence

A

people are consistent in their behaviour and therefore there will be links with elements of the crime and how they behave in everyday life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

significance of time and place

A

this may indicate where the offender is living if the crimes take place with the same forensic centre of gravity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

forensic awareness

A

certain behaviours may reveal an awareness of particular police raining and past experiences e.g. wearing gloves Davies et al 1997 found that rapists who concealed finger prints often had previous convictions of burglary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

geographical profiling

A

analyses the spatial behaviour of a criminal. it looks at the different= locations of a connected series of crimes, the spatial relationship between different crimes and how they might relate to an offenders place of residence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What’s circle theory ?

A

Proposes two models of offender behaviour. People operate within a limited spatial mindset that creates imagined boundaries in which crimes are likely to be committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Marauder

A

Offfender operates near their home base

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Commuters

A

Offender is likely to have travelled a distance away from their usual residence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Investigative psychology evidence

A

David and Rupert 1990 conducted an analysis of 66 sexual assault case. The data was examined using small space analysis several behaviours were identified as common in diffferent samples of behaviour such as the use of impersonal language and lack of reaction to the victim. It supports investigative psychology cause it shows behaviour that occur across crime scenes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Geographical profiling evidence

A

Samantha and David collected information from a 120 murder cases involving serial killers in the us. Smallest space analysis revealed spatial consistency in the behaviour of the killers. The location of each body disposal cite created a centre of gravity presumably because offenders start from their home base they may go in diffferent direction each time they dispose a body but in the end all the different sites create a circular effect around the home base.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Lombrosos research

A

Examined the facial and cranial features of hundreds of Italian convicts both living and deceased. Proposed that the atavistic form was associated with a number of physical anomalies which were key indicators of criminality. 40% of crime o acts could be accounted for by atavistic characteristic criminals : strong jawline a narrow sloping brow high cheekbones dark skin extras toes nipples or fingers
Murders - bloodshot eyes curly hair and long ears
Sexual deviants. - glinting eyes swollen fleshy lips
Fraudsters - thin reedy lips
Other non physical traits unemployment tattoos and use of criminal slang

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Lombrosos reasearch shifted crime reasearch to a more scientific credible realm. Also in trying to describe how particular types of people are likely to commit particular types of crime

A

Scientific credible he examined living and deceased facial features and found 40% criminal activity could be accounted by atavistic characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Delisi 2012 have drawn attention to racial undertones with his research.many features that Lombrosos identified as criminal and atavistI’d such as curly hair and dark skin are most likely to be found with people among African descent .

A

Limitation as reasearch is socially sensitive as it will offend those of ethnic minorities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
No evidence he didn’t compare his criminal sample with a control group
it is possible that had he done so the significant differences in atavistic form that lombroso also failed to account for other important variables within his research. many of the criminals he studied had suffered from a history of psychological disorders which may have confounded the findings. control groups are important as it shows it noty just a coincidence and make it scientific credible
26
even if they have atavistic elements in their facial appearance that Lombroso suggested this does not necessarily mean that this is the cause of their offending .
we still don't know the cause of their offending whether its your environment or if its innate and you've inherited it. nature vs nurture
27
neural explanation
evidence suggests there may be differences in the brains of criminals and non- criminals . most have investigated those with antisocail personality disorder psychopathy. apd is associated with reduced emotional responses and a lack of empathy , common in convicted criminals
28
what did raine find?
Raine used pet scans to comparethe brain of two groups .raine found that there was reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex.he also found an 11%reduction in the volume of grey matter in the prefrontal cortex of people with apd vs controls lowered activity in this area is associated with impulsiveness and loss of control
29
what are mirror neurons?
mirror neurons are a type of brain cell that activate both when we perform an action and when we observe someone else performing that same action. this mirroring mechanism is thought to play a significant role in how we understand and empathise with others. Keyser's et al 2011dound that only when asked would criminal emphasis with someone experiencing pain would their mirror neurons activate. this suggests that apd individuals do not lack empathy but can switch it on and off unlike normal people.
30
genetic explanation
genetic explanations for crime suggest that would be offenders inherit a gene or combination of genes that predispose them to commit a crime.
31
twin studies
suggest that offenders inherit a gene or combination of genes that predispose them to commit crime. Lange 1930 studied 13 identical mz and 17 non identical dz twins where on of each twin had served time in prisons 10 mz but only 2 dz had both served time in prisons Lange concluded genetics must be predominant part in the offender behaviour Christiansen 1977 studied 87 mz and 147 dz and found 33% of mz and 12% dz had also both offended this supports lange suggestion that genetics are a major factor in offending
32
candidate gene
Jari Tihonen et al 2014 analysed genes from 900 offenders revealed abnormalites on two genes associated with violent crime the maoa gene which controls dopamine and serotonin levels in the brain and linked to aggressive behaviour cdh13 gene linked with substance abuse and add this combination made it 13 times more likely the individual would have a history of violent behaviour
33
diathesis stress model
genetic predisposition + environmental effect = criminality it shows that we are genetically predisposed to violent behaviour and can trigger it dues to the right environment effecting leading to criminality. This known as diathesis stress model
34
extraversion
people with high e scores are risk takers, seek sensation and stimulation. they also do not condition easily and not learn from mistakes biological basis - under aroused nervous system meaning they constantly seek excitement stimulator and are likley to engage i risk taking and dangerous behaviours which may explain some offending behaviour
35
neuroticism
people with high n scores are overanxious, nervous and react very strongly to averse negative stimuli a high n score results in a high degree of instability biological basis- more reactive sympathetic nervous system ie greater response to threat thet are unstable overreact to threats
36
psychoticism
people who score high are aggressive antisocial, cold and egocentric biological basis-high levels testosterene more likely to be aggressive
37
the role of socailisation
eysenck saw criminal behaviour as developmentally immature as it is selfish and concerned with immediate gratification socialisation teaches children to be able to delay gratification and be more socially oriented however people with high n and e scores are hard to condition because of their nervous system they cannot learn to respond to antisocial impulses with anxiety and therefore are more likely to act antisocially
38
Eysenck compared 2070 male prisoners scores on the epi with 2422 male controls. On measures of psychoticism , extraversion and neuroticism prisoners recorded high score than controls
this supports his theory that criminals have certain personality types
39
bartol and Holanchock 1979 studied Hispanic African - American offenders in a maximum security prison in new York and divided these into six groups based on their criminal history and the nature of their offences .it was found that all six groups were less extravert than a non criminal control group
the researcher suggested that this was because their sample was a very different cultural group than that investigated by Eysenck. This questions the generalisability of the criminal personality theory.
40
the score or label given to any person depends on the answers they provide on personality questionaire such as the epi. the traits may apply to them but there answers may not refelect reality. for example when asked are you lively most people may answer sometimes but have to choose between yes and no and so may choose socially desireable answer are not entirely truthful.
however, this is countered by the use of lie scales such as are all of your habit good and desirable? people who choose yes to many of these questions are deemed as dishonest and answering in a socially desireable way and so their data is discarded. this suggests that personality questonaires may validly measure personality and so be useful in the measurement of the criminal personality but that results should be treated with caution as it may be possible to answer in socailly desirable and therefore dishonest ways without being detected by the lie scales.
41
level of moral reasoning
kohlberg proposed that peoples decisions and judgements on issues of right and wrong can be summarised in a stage theory of moral development the higher the stage the more sophisticated the reasoning. studies such as kohlberg et al 1973 have found that criminals have a lower level of moral reasoning than non- criminals violent youths ere significantly lower in their moral development tha non-violent youths even after controlling for social back grounds. lower level of moral reasoning more likely to be a criminal
42
pre convential
children accept the rules of authority figures and judge actions by their consequences. actions that result in punishments are bad those those that bring rewards are goods stage one - punishment and obedience focuses on rules enforced by punishment stage two - instrumental purpose- what counts as right is defined by one's own needs rules are obeyed for personal gain
43
conventional level
individuals continue to believe that conformity to social rules is desirable but this is not out of self interest. Maintaining current social system ensures positive human relationships and social order. stage 3- good boy/ girl what is right is defined by what others expect rules are obeyed for approval stage 4- social order- reference to duties of each citizen rules are obeyed to maintain social order
44
post conventional level
individual moves beyond unquestioning compliance to the norms of the social system. The individual now defines morality in terms of abstract moral principles that apply to all societies and situations . stage 5- social contract : individual rights may be more important than the law. stage 6 - universal ethical principles the individual establishes his or her own rules in accordance with a personal set of ethical principles
45
what did Kohlberg study find?
found that criminals have a lower level of moral reasoning than non-criminals. violent youths were significantly lower in their moral development than non- violent youths even after controlling for social back ground lower level of moral reasoning more likely to be criminal
46
what are cognitive distortion?
cognitive distortions are a way of irrational thinking. distortions are a way that reality has become twisted so that what is perceived no longer represents what is true
47
what is hostile attribution bias?
which assumes that other peoples actions are in some way a negative reaction to the self. e,g you walk into a room where two colleagues are talking and they stop and you think its about you
48
what's the research for hostile attribution bias?
- research has shown that there is a relationship between hostile attribution bias and aggression (Schoenberg and Justyne 2014) - 55 violent offenders were shown emotionally ambiguous facial expressesions, when compared with a control group the violent offenders were significantly more likely to perceive the images as angry and hostile. - dodge and Frame 1982 found that children identified as being aggressive were more likely to interpret an 'ambigous' provocation as hostile.
49
what is minimalization?
- a type of cognitive distortion that downplays the effect of the crime by the offender bandura 1973 - a form of self- deception, the offender does not accept the full reality of the situations and will attempt to rationalise what they have done. e.g. a burglar who justifies stealing to provide for his family - this involves strategies where the act might be trivialised or sometimes the victim is blamed - a way of reducing the offenders feeling of guilt
50
what's the research for minimalization?
Kennedy & grubin 1992 found the majority of sex offenders tended to blame the victim 1/4 of those interviewed thought the abuse was a positive thing for the victim barbaree 1991 found that amongst 26 convicted rapists 54% denied they had committed an offence at all and 40%minimised the harm that they had caused the victim pollock and hashmall 1991 report that 35% of a sample of child molesters said that the crime they committed was non- sexual 36% said that the victims had consented
51
research evidence to support Kohlberg moral development evaluating cognitive explanations
There is research evidence to support kohlberg's theory of moral development. palmer and hollin 1998 compared moral reasoning between 210 female non- offenders 122 male non- offenders and 126 convicted offenders using 11 moral dilemma related questions. the delinquent group showed less mature moral reasoning than the non- delinquent group. this shows that they have a lower level of moral reasoning . that people engage in criminal activity have a lower level of moral reasoning so there acting in self interest and not what's right.
52
research evidence to support hostile attribution bias evaluating cognitive explanations
There is research evidence to support hostile attribution bias. Schonenberg and Justye 2014 presented 55 violent offenders with images of emotionally ambiguous expressions. when compared with matched control participants , the violent offenders were significantly more likely to perceive the images as angry and hostile. this says that people with hostile attribution bias people react negative to them self are retaining when they are actually starting therefore more likely to commit violent crimes.
53
what is differential association?
An explanation for offending which proposes that through interaction with others individual learn values, attitudes, techniques and motive for criminal behaviour.
54
what did Sutherland 1924 suggest?
- criminal behaviour is learnt through association with different people - if criminal association outweighs non- criminal association offending behaviour will occur
55
what are the key areas for differential association theory ?
1crime as learned behaviour 2 pro- criminal attitudes 3 learning criminal acts
56
what is meant by learned attitude towards crime?
- pro- criminal attitude= criminality - Sutherland argues if the number of pro criminal attitudes a person acquires outweighs the number of anti-criminal attitudes, then they will go on to offend. - DA suggests that we should be able to carry out a simple mathematical calculation to predict the likelihood of someone committing a crime all we need to know is : the frequency , intensity & duration of their exposure to criminal & non-criminal norm& values
57
what is meant by learning criminal acts?
In addition to learning about why they might want to commit a crime, criminals may also learn how to carry out crimes may also learn how to carry out crimes e.g. how to break into someone's house through a locked window how to spot the signs of an empty house the delicate touch of a pick pocket this can help explain re-offending when people are released from prison as they learn specific techniques from inmates learning can happen through observation & imitation -direct/indirect operant conditioning- being rewarded or punishedfor their behaviour - role models
58
explains different types of crimes evaluating differential association theory
differential association theory can account for crime within all sectors of society. some types of crime such as burglary might be clustered within inner-city working class communities other are more prevalent amongst more wealthy groups in society. Sutherland was particularly interested in white collar or corporate crime and how this may be a feature of middle class social groups who share deviant norms values. it explains different types of crimes.why we have different crimes in different sections of society and why crimes may differ across cultures.
59
realistic solutions to the problem of crime evaluating differential association theory
Differential association theory draws attention to the fact that dysfunctional social circumstances and environments may be more to blame for criminality than dysfunctional people, as was advocated by atavistic form. the theory marked an important shift from 'blaming 'individual factors to pointing to social factors. this approach is more desirable because it offers a more realistic solution to the problem of crime because learning environments can be changed instead of genetics.
60
what are the two psychodynamic explanations that abide by the freudian principle that the roots of criminal behaviour is formed in childhood are:
1 Blackburn's idea of the inadequate superego 2 bowlby's maternal deprivation theory
61
what is Blackburn's idea of the inadequate superego?
Blackburn 1993 argued that if the superego(morality) is deficient or inadequate then criminal behaviour is inevitable because the id is given free reign and not properly controlled. Three types of superegos have been proposed to explain criminality
62
what are the three types of superego?
the weak superego- if the same sex parent during phallic stage the child cannot internalise a fully formed superego as there is no opportunity for identification this would make immoral or criminal behaviour more likely. deviant superego - if the superego the child internalises has immoral or deviant values this would lead to offending behaviour for instance a boy that is raised by a criminal father is likely to not associate guilt with wrong doing. over-harsh superego - A healthy superego is like a kind but firm internal parent it has rules but is also forgiving of transgressions. in contrast, an excessively punitive or overly harsh superego means individual is crippled by guilt and anxiety.
63
what is Bowlby's maternal deprivation theory?
- Bowlby 1944 argued that the inability to form meaningful relationships in adulthood was dependant upon the child forming a warm, continuous relationship with a mother figure ie they have a healthy internal working model - the maternal bond was seen by Bowlby as unique, superior to any other and vital to the child well being and development - failure to establish such a bond during the first few years of life means the child will experience a number of damaging and irreversible consequence in later life
64
what is affectionless psychopathy?
- one of these is the development of a particular personality type, known as affectionless psychopathy, characterised by a lack of guilty empathy and feelings for others. - such maternally deprived individuals are likely to engage in acts of delinquency and cannot develop close relationships with others, as they lack the necessary early experience to do so.
65
what did he find in the 44 juvenile thieves study?
- he found through interviews with the thieves and their families, that 14 of the sample he studied showed personality and behavioural characteristics that could be classified as 'affectionless psychopathy'. people with affectionless psychopathy don't have an internal working model as they are maternally deprived and don't understand what an attachment or good relationship looks like.
66
psychodynamic explanation lacks scientific credibility
psychodynamic explanations in general suffer from a lack of falsifiability. the many unconscious concepts within Freudian theory mean that applications to crime, such as those considered here, are not open to empirical testing. in the absence of supporting evidence ,arguments such as the inadequate superego can only be judged on their face value rather than their scientific worth. for this reason, psychodynamic explanations are regarded as pseudoscientific ( fake science) and may contribute little to our understanding or how to prevent it . to be fair Bowlby did provide evidence to support his assertions - through his 44 thieves study has been criticised on methodological grounds .as it lacks scientific credibility blackburn because not testable and doesnt provide causation on why same sex parent of child absence would cause a child to commit more crimes. bowlby had a small sample and research bias as he had preconceptions which may have influenced his interviewees responses .
67
Blackburn's theory is deterministic
there is very little evidence that children raised without a same sex parent are less law abiding as adults( or fail to develop a conscious ) - this contradicts blackburn's weak superego arguement. similarily, if children who are raised by deviant parents go on to commit crime themselves , this could be due to the influence of genetics or socialisation , rather than the formation of a deviant superego. finally , the idea that criminal behaviour reflects an unconscious desire for punishment seems implausible ,as most offenders go to great lengths to conceal their crimes which suggest they want to avoid punishment at all costs.