Memory Flashcards
Explanations for forgetting what is retroactive interference?
Happens when a newer memory interferes with an older one. For example your teacher has learned so many names this year she has difficulty remembering last years
Explanations for forgetting what is proactive interference
This is where an older memory interferes with an older one for example your teacher learned so many names last year she struggles remembering this year.
Effects on similarity
Interference is worse when memories are similar discovered by mcgeoch and mc Donald studied retroactive interference by changing the amount of similarity between two sets of material . Participant had to learn a list of ten words until they remember with 100% accuracy .
When participants were asked to recall the original list
What is memory ?
Memory is a process in which information is retained about the past
What is the reasearch on coding ?
Baddelet 1966
The method : partcipants were given one of the following 4 sets of words - either
Group one : acoustically similar
Group two : acoustically dissimilar
Group three : semantically similar
Group four : semantically dissimilar
Partcipants were asked to recall words in order correctly immeadiately or following a 20 min task.
What were baddeley coding results ?
When recalling list immeadiately from stm partcipants had difficulty recalling acoustically similar words. If recalling after an interval from Ltm they had problems with semantically similar words.
What can we conclude from baddeleys coding research ?
Suggest that ltm is more likely to rely on semantic coding and stm on acoustic coding.
Weakness of baddeleys coding research ?
It included an artificial task as it was a list of words which isn’t how we use our memory in everyday life. This means that we should be cautious about generalising the findings to other types of memory tasks. For example people may use semantic coding when processing more meaningful words even for stm tasks . This suggests that the finding has limited application and low mundane realism.
What’s Jacob’s research’s on capacity?
Method : ps were presented with a string of digits or letters they had to repeat them in the same order. The number of digits or letters increased until the p failed to remember the correct order.
What were Jacob’s capacity results ?
Most of the time partcipants recalled 9.3 digits or 7.3 letters.
What were Jacob’s capacity conclusions ?
Jacob’s concluded that the stm storage is limited capacity of 5-9 items. Individual differences were found such as stm increasing with age, possibly due to memory techniques such as chunking .
What did miller find?
Miller reviewed research into the capacity of stm and made observations of everyday practice. He noticed that things come in sevens 7 notes on a musical scale, 7 days 7 deadly sins. He argued that the capacity of stm is 7 + 2
He suggested that we use ‘ chunking ‘ to combine individual letters or numbers into larger more meaningful units. Because you can chunk it together and give it a meaning so it’s easier to remember.
Evaluation of Jacob’s 1887 research
Research would not have the controls we have now therefore there will be be extraneous variables that became confounding variables may affect the results . This is a problem as it could affect the validity of the experiment
Evaluation of millers
Cowan reviewed research and concluded stm capacity has 4 chunks which supports millers conclusion as he believed our stm stored chunks of information. However he suggested the capacity’s was 7 pieces of chunked information this suggest he overestimated the chunks of stm and how much it can hold . This suggest millers research may be flawed as it found it can not hold as much as it originally suggested.
What was Peter sons and Peter sons research on duration ?
Method : 24 undergraduate each took part in 8 trials. A ‘ trial ‘ is one test . On each trial the student was given a consonant syllable also known as a trigram. They were also given a 3 digit number to start counting backwards from . On each trial, they were told to stop after a different amount of time 3,6,9 ,12,15 or 18 seconds and then recall the trigram.
Why were they asked to count backwards from three digit number in petersons research ?
Interference task to prevent them from repeating the letters internally which could make it easier to remember. From maintenance rehearsal from the stm.
What were petersons and petersons results ?
After 3 seconds recall 80% of trigrams correctly after 18 secs recall 10% repeated correctly .
What were petersons and petersons conclusions ?
When rehearsal is prevented very little stays in the stm for longer than 18 seconds
Evaluation of petersons and petersons research
It was a lab experiment meaning variables can be highly controlled and less likely to have extraneous variable affecting the experiment and it’s easier to replicate and other researcher can repeat and make the research reliable by finding the same findings and also helps establish a cause and affect relationship.
Meaningless stimuli
There research is based on artificial task and meaningless stimuli like recalling trigrams. As this isn’t part everyday life it has limited application as we can’t. Apply to everyday life therefore has low ecological validity.
What was bahicks method?
Method : 392 aged 17-74 from state Ohio USA partcipants were asked to list the names of ex classmates free recall test they were also shown 50 photos from high school yearbook photo recognition test.
What were bahicks results ?
15 years after leaving school= recognise 90% names and faces. About 60% accurate on free recall. After 48 years = photo recognition was about 70% accurate and free recall 30% accurate
What were bahicks conclusions ?
Evidence of vltms in a real life setting. Recognition is better than recall, so there may be a huge store of information but it’s not always easy access to all of it.
Evaluation of bahicks research
He studied real life meaningful memories this is goods has it has high ecological validity this mean it can be applied to real life everyday memory and can generalise it to how much we recall in everyday life. However there partcipants were all Americans from Ohio therefore lacks population’s validity and can’t generalise his findings to other populations for example students from the uk. We are unable to conclude if other populations would recall the same better or worse after 47 years. There is also no way of knowing exactly why information is recalled well it just shows meaningful information is recalled better.