Forensics Flashcards
(63 cards)
Canter et al (2004) (evaluation)
- of the top-down approach
Analysed 100 murders in the USA and found that there were no specific disorganised characteristics
Holmes (1989) (evaluation)
- of top-down approach
More types of serial killer: visionary, mission, hedonistic and power/control
Aim and procedure of Canter (2004)
Aim: To test the reliability of the top-down typology by applying it to 100 cases.
Procedure: A content analysis of 100 cases of serial killers from the US. The cases came from published accounts and were cross checked with court reports and officers where possible.
Findings of Canter (2004)
Twice as many disorganised crimes as organised crimes were identified, suggesting that disorganised offenders are more common or easier to identify.
Two behaviours occurred significantly above chance:
- In 70% of cases, the body was concealed.
- In 75% of cases, sexual activity had occurred.
Further analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between organised and disorganised variables.
What does the bottom-up approach look at?
Looks for consistencies in the offender’s behaviour during the crime. These can be inferred from the crime scene or surviving victim accounts.
At what point is an initial assumption made about the offender in the bottom-up approach?
After a statistical analysis using correlational techniques has been carried out on the details of the cases
Possible issues with the bottom-up approach?
Anomalous results Eyewitness testimony Not all crimes are reported Data being lost Human error Leading questions Not all crimes are followed up
Smallest space analysis
A computer program that identifies correlations across patterns of behaviour
Canter and Heritage (evaluation)
+ of bottom up approach
Content analysis of 66 sexual assault cases, used smallest space analysis and found several characteristics common with perpetrators - shows how statistical testing can be used
Lundrigan and Canter (evaluation)
+ of bottom up approach
120 murder cases with serial killers, used smallest space analysis and found spatial consistency and a ‘centre of gravity’
Which crimes is the bottom up approach suited to? (evaluation)
+ of bottom up approach
Can be applied to a wider range of offences
Three types of criminals according to Lombroso
Born criminal - the atavistic
Insane criminal - suffering from mental illness
Criminaloid - mental characteristics predisposed them to criminal behaviour under the right circumstance
Mednick (1984)
Conducted an adoption study of 13000 Danish adoptees. Found criminality in correlation of biological and adoptive parents having a criminal record (24.5%)
Supports diathesis stress
Prefrontal cortex in crime
Raine (2004) found from 71 brain imaging studies that criminals have reduced functioning in the prefrontal cortex. Lowered activity in this area is associated with loss of control
Neurotransmitters in crime
Serotonin: inhibits the prefrontal cortex. Dopamine hyperactivity may enhance this effect.
Noradrenaline: very high and very low levels have been associated with aggression and criminal behaviour. High levels are associated of sympathetic nervous system and the fight or flight response. Low levels would reduce the ability for people to react to perceived threats.
Genetics vs neural (evaluation)
- of neural explanations
Current thinking is that there are many genes involved which can be switched on or off depending on environmental factors
Research (evaluation of neural explanations)
- of neural explanations
Research has been based on aggressiveness rather than offending
Cause of extraversion
Underarousal in nervous system
Cause of neuroticism
Instability in sympathetic nervous system
Cause of psychoticism
Higher levels of testosterone
Sampling size of Eysenck (evaluation)
+ of Eysenck’s theory
Study is generalisable (uses 2422 male controls vs 2070 male prisoners and wide age range 16-69)
Farrington et al (evaluation)
- of Eysenck’s theory
David Farrington et al found no consistent difference between extraverts’ cortical arousal compared to introverts when using EEG measures
Mischel (1988) (evaluation)
- of Eysenck’s theory
Suggested that personality cannot be reduced to a score. We change depending on our situation.
Cognitive distortions
A form of irrational thinking