Gender - Paper 3 Flashcards
Paper 3 (52 cards)
What is the difference between sex and gender?
Sex is innate (biological) in nature whereas gender is at least partly environmental. This would suggest that a person’s sex cannot be changed. A person’s gender however is seen to be a more open concept. It is assumed that a person may be more ‘masculine’ or ‘feminine’ depending on the social context they are in.
What is Imperato-McGinley et al’s study on sex and gender?
Conducted a study on a unique family known as the Batista family who lived in the Dominican Republic. Four of the children were identified as being female at birth and were raised as such, however, they were actually genetically male. This very rare genetic condition meant that when hormonal changes occurred in puberty, their vaginas closed over and they developed penises. All of the boys abandoned their female gender and identified as male from that point forward. This would suggest that gender is flexible.
What are sex-role stereotypes?
Societies expectations of what roles are seen to be appropriate for males or females are often communicated and reinforced by parents, teachers and the media. For example, Furnham and Farrager (2000) analysed TV adverts and found that men are more likely to be shown in autonomous roles in professional contexts whereas women were depicted in familial roles within domestic settings.
Although some sex role stereotypes have an element of truth behind them, many do not, which leads to sexist views being formed. For example, recent research has found that women do seem to cope better with multi-tasking than males but there is no strong evidence to suggest that women struggle to control their emotions in the work place.
What is androgyny?
To show an even balance of qualities or characteristics that are typically associated with the genders. The term comes from the combined ‘andro’ meaning ‘male’ and ‘gyny’ meaning ‘female’. Both males and females can be described as being androgynous. For example, an individual who is aggressive and competitive at work but a kind and sensitive parent is displaying typically male and female characteristics.
Androgynous individuals tend to have more positive psychological health outcomes than typically masculine or typically feminine individuals.
How is androgyny measured?
Bem Sex Role Inventory
What is the Bem Sex Role Inventory?
It is a self-report with 60 items all rated on a seven point likert scale. 20 items are related to stereotypically masculine characteristics, 20 items are related to stereotypically female characteristics and 20 items are gender-neutral filler items. The scores are calculated to identify the individuals overall type. The BSRI is an indicator or psychological well-being and mental health rather than just having masculine or feminine qualities.
Scoring of the BSRI - Scores are then classified on two dimensions – masculinity – femininity and androgynous – undifferentiated:
What are the positive evaluation points of androgyny and measuring it?
Burchardt and Serbin (1982) provided supporting research for a positive correlation between androgyny and good mental health, particularly in relation to lower levels of depression in androgynous females. Androgynous college males also scored lower on social introversion than feminine females. The findings therefore support the importance of androgyny as an indicator of positive mental health.
Furthermore
Peters and Cantrell (1993) used the BSRI to provide supporting evidence that androgynous females had the best quality of relationships, supporting the idea of a positive condition and it being associated with higher interpersonal functioning than individuals who are predominantly masculine or feminine. Therefore this increases the validity of the BSRI as a measure of psychological well being.
What are the negative evaluation points of androgyny and measuring it?
Critics argue that androgyny is not always associated with positive mental health. For example, androgynous individuals may demonstrate negative masculine characteristics such as aggressiveness, and negative feminine characteristics such as being too timid in certain situations. This therefore criticises Bem’s idea of positive psychological wellbeing.
A strength of the BSRI is that it has good test-retest reliability. Research has demonstrated high correlation co-efficients of .76 to .94 over a 4-week period. Furthermore, the shorter version of the test which has 30 items has improved test-retest reliability with a correlation of .90. This therefore suggests that the inventory is a reliable way to measure androgyny.
However
A limitation of the BSRI is that it’s temporal validity has been questioned. This is because it was created by data generated from American students in the 1970s and typical gender behaviour may have changed since then. For example more contemporary research was conducted on a group of 400 undergraduates who were asked to rate the items on the BSRI as masculine or feminine, only two of the items were still considered to be masculine or feminine. This therefore suggests that the BSRI is outdated as a measure of androgyny.
What is the biological perspective of sex and gender?
Sex and gender are the same. Our biological sex determines our gender development
What is the role of chromosomes in gender?
Each person has 23 pairs of chromosomes. Each of these chromosomes carries hundreds of genes containing instructions about physical and behavioural characteristics such as eye colour and predisposition to certain mental illnesses.
One pair of chromosomes are called the sex chromosomes because they determine an individual’s biological sex. A female’s chromosomal structure is XX and a male is XY.
A mother’s egg always contains an X chromosome, the sperm fertilising the egg will carry either an X or Y chromosome. If it carries an X, the baby will then have XX chromosomes and be female, if it carries a Y then the baby will have XY chromosomes and be male.
Up to about 6 weeks into pregnancy, male and female foetuses look the same i.e. their gonads (sexual organs) are no different. However around the 6th week the sex chromosomes will begin to have an effect. If the fertilising sperm contained an X chromosome then the gonads will develop into ovaries. If, however, the sperm had contained a Y chromosome then the gonads would develop into testes.
The Y chromosome carries a gene called the SRY gene which causes testes to develop in an XY embryo. The testes produce androgens (male sex hormones) which cause the embryo to become a male, without them the embryo would develop into a female.
What is the role of hormones in gender?
Chromosomes initially determine a person’s sex but most gender development occurs through the influence of hormones. Prenatally in the womb, hormones act upon brain development and cause the development of reproductive organs. At puberty, a burst of hormonal activity triggers the development of secondary sexual characteristics such as pubic hair. Males and females produce many of the same hormones but in different concentrations.
How does testosterone affect gender development?
Testosterone is a male hormone which is produced prenatally and controls the development of male sex organs. Testosterone also affects brain development both prenatally and later in childhood. Much research has focussed on the behavioural effects of testosterone and its link to aggression. Human and animal studies have demonstrated the influence of increased testosterone on aggressive behaviour.
How does oestrogen affect gender development?
Oestrogen is a female hormone that determines female sexual characteristics and menstruation. The default gender is female and so females do not need hormones to direct prenatal gender development. Oestrogen plays a major role from puberty onwards promoting secondary sexual characteristics such as breast development and directing the menstrual cycle. Oestrogen also causes some women to experience heightened emotions and irritability during their menstrual cycle.
How does oxytocin affect gender development?
Women typically produce oxytocin in much larger amounts than men and is sometimes referred to as the love hormone. Oxytocin is released in massive quantities during labour and after childbirth and makes the new mother feel ‘in love’ with the baby. The hormone stimulates lactation making it possible for women to breast feed and reduces the stress hormone cortisol facilitating bonding. The fact that men produce less Oxytocin has fuelled the stereotype that men are less interested in intimacy and closeness in a relationship.
What are the positive evaluation points for testosterone in sex and gender?
Dabbs et al (1995) found, in a prison population, that offenders with the highest levels of testosterone were more likely to have committed violent or sexually motivated crimes. Van Goozen et al (1995) studied transgender individuals who were undergoing hormone treatment and being injected with hormones of the opposite sex. Transgender women (male-to-female) showed a decrease in aggression and visuo-spatial skills whilst transgender men (female-to-male) showed the opposite. These studies therefore support the role of sex hormones in gender-related behaviour such as aggression.
What are the negative evaluation points of chromosomes and hormones in sex and gender?
Research by Tricker et al. (1996) gave males either 10 weekly injections of testosterone or a placebo and found no significant differences in aggression. This is consistent with further research, which has found that sex hormones had no consistent effect on gender development. This therefore questions the view that sex hormones determine behaviour.
Research into cross cultural gender differences has been used to criticise the role of chromosomes and hormones in sex and gender. Mead (1935) conducted research into three tribes in Papua New Guinea. In the Arapesh, both males and females displayed non-aggressive gentle, typically feminine behaviour. In the Mundugumor tribe both males and females behaved in an masculine way- aggressive and assertive and in the Tchambuli tribe sex role behaviour was completely reversed. This therefore suggests that the environment has a larger influence on gender development as if the main cause was biological (e.g. Hormones) then the same differences would be seen across all tribes.
The biological accounts of gender oversimplify a complex concept. Gender is reduced down to the level of chromosomes and hormones and ignores alternative explanations for gender development. For example, the psychodynamic approach would suggest that childhood experiences such as interactions within the family are important for gender identity. Therefore, just focusing on biological understanding ignores other possible influences, which point to a more complex process in gender development.
A limitation of research into the role of sex hormones such as oestrogen is that it can lead to negative stereotypes. Some people object to the medical category pre-menstrual syndrome on the grounds that it a social construction, which privileges women over men. Therefore, some feminists would argue that by creating these stereotypes women’s emotions are being dismissed by explaining them in biological terms.
What are atypical sex chromsomes?
Klinefelter’s syndrome and Turner’s syndrome
What is Klinefelter’s syndrome?
Individuals who have this condition are biologically male, with the anatomical appearance of males and have an additional X chromosome. Their sex chromosome structure is XXY. Approximately 1 in 1000 males have this condition. Diagnosis often occurs accidentally via a medical examination for some unrelated condition.
Physical characteristics;
* Reduced body hair
* Underdeveloped genitals
* Some breast development at puberty and a ‘softening’ or ‘rounding’ of body contours
* More susceptible to health problems found in females such as breast cancer
Psychological characteristics:
* Poorly developed language skills and reading ability
* Passive and shy
* Lack of interest in sexual activity
* Tend not to respond well in stressful situations
What is Turner’s syndrome?
This is caused by an absence of one of the two allocated X chromosomes and is referred to as XO. This means the individual has 45 chromosomes rather than the usual 46. This occurs in about 1 in 2000 females at birth.
Physical characteristics:
* Underdeveloped ovaries, leading to a lack of monthly periods
* Do not develop breasts at puberty and instead have a broad chest
* Low set ears and a webbed neck
* Physically immature and retain appearance of pre-pubescent girls
Psychological characteristics:
* Higher than average reading ability
* Lower performance on spatial, visual memory and mathematical skills
What are the positive evaluation points of atypical sex chromosome patterns?
A strength of research into atypical sex chromosomes is that the research has practical applications. Herlihy (2012) showed that individuals identified and treated from a very young age has significant benefits compared to those who had been diagnosed in adulthood. Further research is likely to lead to earlier diagnosis and an increased understanding of those issues faced by those syndromes. Such research will therefore have a direct benefit to people who have these atypical chromosomal patterns as well as increasing our understanding of atypical development.
Furthermore
Studies into atypical sex chromosome patterns are beneficial as they contribute towards our understanding of the nature-nurture debate in gender development as a whole. By comparing individuals with these conditions with individuals who have typical chromosomal patterns it allows researchers to identify differences in gender behaviour. For example, individuals with Turner’s syndrome tend to talk more than ‘typical’ girls. This therefore leads researchers to conclude that this is due to chromosomal differences providing evidence for the role of nature in gender development.
What are the negative evaluation points of atypical sex chromosome patterns?
A limitation is that the participants used in studies into atypical sex chromosomes are unique. Individuals with unusual conditions, particularly those with conditions that impact on their physical appearance, are unlikely to be treated the same way by their peers. This means that it is difficult to separate the contribution of nature and nurture on gender. Overall this therefore makes it difficult to generalise findings from case studies to all people who may have the gender conditions.
In addition
A limitation of research into atypical sex chromosome patterns is that is there is a lack of causal relationships. It is possible that the impact of environmental and/or social influences are more important than the research suggests. For example, social maturity in females with Turner’s syndrome may be due to the way others respond to their physical immaturity rather than a biological cause related to their chromosomes. Therefore, it is difficult to establish the cause of social maturity as being due to the atypical chromosome patterns.
A further criticism of research into this area is that there is no such thing as typical and atypical gender behaviour. One of the symptoms of Turner’s syndrome is that females are socially immature compared to the vast majority of females. Research by Maccoby and Jacklin has actually found that there are significantly more gender differences within the sexes than between them. This therefore suggests that assumptions about typical gender behaviour are often based more around stereotypes than fact.
What are the cognitive explanations of gender development?
Kohlberg’s theory and gender schema theory
What is Kohlberg’s theory of gender development? (cognitive)
Kohlberg believes that gender development including gender identity and gender roles is determined by a child’s level of thinking and understanding.
When children have the cognitive ability to understand that gender is fixed and constant, at about 7 years, they develop schemas of appropriate and inappropriate same sex behaviour and characteristics, such as clothing, hairstyles, occupations and personality.
Gender schemas and gender roles develop through environmental interactions in which children actively seek out and imitate same sex models and focus on other gender information of how to behave like a boy or girl, Kohlberg called this self-socialisation.
Kohlberg argues that children go through three distinct stages in the development of full gender identity:
Stage 1: Gender identity and occurs between about 2–3 years. This is when a child understands that they are a boy or a girl, but believe that gender can change.
Stage 2: Gender stability and occurs between 3-5 years. The child understands that their gender is fixed over time and that boys become men and girls become women but they are unable to apply this to other people and other situations. They are also confused by changes in appearance so if a man has long hair, they will think he is a woman.
Stage 3: Gender constancy and occurs between 6–7 years. At this stage the child understands gender remains fixed over time and different situations. Children are cognitively ready to develop appropriate gender roles and behaviour.
What are the strengths of Kohlberg’s theory of gender development?
- McConaghy (1979) found that when a doll was dressed in transparent clothes so there was a discrepancy between its clothing and its genitals, 3 to 4 year old children decided on the dolls gender on the basis of clothing. This study therefore supports Kohlberg’s theory of gender development because it suggests that gender constancy has not yet been achieved by this age in line with what Kohlberg predicts. Furthermore Munroe et al (1984) found that Kohlberg’s three stages of gender identity development was similar and occurred in the same order in six cultures (USA, Kenya, Nepal, Belize and Samoa). This study provides evidence that the three stages may be universal and based on biological maturation of cognitive structures as Kohlberg claims which strengthens the explanation.
- Kohlberg’s explanation of gender development unlike most other explanations can be given credit for taking into account both nature and nurture, because the three stages of gender development are universal and not limited by cultural relativism so are based on nature, and self-socialisation focuses on experiences so is based on nurture. By considering both nature and nurture, it could be argued that this makes Kohlberg’s explanation of gender development more reasonable and therefore acceptable.