Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

AQA A-Level Psychology > Social Influence - Paper 1 > Flashcards

Social Influence - Paper 1 Flashcards

Paper 1

1
Q

What is conformity?

A

A change in a person’s opinion/behaviour as a response to real or imagined group pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is conformity also known as?

A

Majority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When does conformity occur?

A

When an individuals behaviour and/or beliefs are influenced by a larger group of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the weakest form of conformity?

A

Compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is compliance?

A

An individual maintains their private views but goes along with the majority publicly in order to gain approval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is identification?

A

Public and private acceptance of majority influence in order to gain acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is internalisation also known as

A

True conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is internalisation?

A

Individuals genuinely adjust their behaviour and opinions of the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can internalisation also occur?

A

Occurs through minority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is informational social influence?

A

A motivational force to look to others for guidance in order to be correct (desire to be right)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What situation does ISI usually occur?

A

Occurs in unfamiliar/ambiguous situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is normative social influence?

A

A motivational force to be liked and accepted by the group (desire to be liked)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why do we have normative social influence?

A

Wanting others to respect them and not reject them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What research shows NSI?

A

Asch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the positive evaluation points of the explanations of conformity?

A

Research support
ISI: Lucas et al (asked students to answer maths problems that were either easy or difficult, greater conformity to incorrect answers when q’s were difficult
NSI: Asch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the negative evaluation points for the explanations of conformity?

A
  • Oversimplified: both processes could be involved
  • Individual differences: NSI affects some more than others, some have greater need to be liked so are more affected, some have less so are less affected
    McGhee and Teevan: students who have a need to be liked are more likely to conform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the aim of Asch’s study?

A

To see the degree to which individuals would conform to the majority who gave obviously wrong answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was Asch’s sample?

A

123 American male student volunteers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is an issue with Asch’s sample?

A
  • Small sample: both ethnocentric and androcentric
  • Volunteers: were told it was a visual perception test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What was the procedure for Asch’s study?

A
  • Groups of 6/7, pps matched standard line with A, B or C
  • Only one of the pps was genuine, others confederates
  • Real pps second to last
  • Confederates gave unanimous wrong answers on 12/18 trials (critical trials)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What was the conformity rate for Asch’s study?

A

33%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How many pps conformed at least once in Asch’s study?

A

75%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Findings of Asch’s control group

A

Pps made mistakes about 1% of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What was Asch’s conclusion?

A

That a majority can influence a minority even in an unambiguous situation thus demonstrating NSI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What were the post-interview findings in Asch’s study?

A
  1. Distortion of judgement: not sure on accuracy so conformed to the majority
  2. Distortion of perception: didn’t known answer so actually conformed
  3. Distortion of action: avoided ridicule
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the factors effecting conformity

A
  1. Group size
  2. Unanimity
  3. Task difficulty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What percentage was the conformity rate with ONE confederates in Asch’s study?

A

3%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What percentage was the conformity rate with TWO confederates in Asch’s study?

A

13%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What percentage was the conformity rate with THREE confederates in Asch’s study?

A

32%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What happened when Asch’s study reached to 7 confederates?

A

There was no further increase in conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What happened when Asch introduced a confederate who gave right answers? (Broke unanimity of the majority)

A

Conformity dropped to 5% from 33% in original experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What does Unanimity do to social Influence?

A

Conformity rates decline when the majority influence isn’t unanimous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is in important factor in unanimity?

A

Majority’s reduction in agreement rather than an individual gives support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What was the other condition in Asch’s changes to unanimity?

A

The ‘rebel’ confederate went against both confederates and real participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What the results for the rebel going against confederates and participant in Asch’s study?

A

Dropped to 9%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What happens to conformity rates as the task difficulty increases? (Asch)

A

Conformity rate increases. This suggests that when the situation is more ambiguous we are more likely to conform due to ISI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What will individuals do as the task difficulty increases?

A

They will look to others for guidance (ISI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What type of social influence is the dominant force in task difficulty?

A

Informational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What happened in Asch’s study when he increased the task difficulty?

A

Making the lines look more similar so the pps became more likely to conform to wrong answers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What are the positive evaluation points for Asch’s study?

A

Asch’s study of conformity became a paradigm as the accepted way for conducting conformity research.
It is also a lab experiment with a standardised procedure so is replicable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What are the negative evaluation points for Asch’s study?

A
  1. The research is a ‘child of its time’ - the research took place in a period of US history when conformity was high. Perrin and Spencer repeated the study in the UK in 80s using engineering students, found one conforming response out of 396 trials, cultural change has taken place since Asch’s research so lacks temporal and historic validity
  2. Methodological issues:
    Demand characteristics - may have tried to please Asch by behaviour in a way they thought they were intended to lowering internal validity as it is not accurately measured.
    Mundane realism - task of identifying lines is trivial so there was no real reason to conform. The groups don’t resemble groups that occur in real life. Findings cannot be generalised to everyday situations of conformity
  3. Limited application: all male sample, research suggests women might be more conformist (more concerned about social relationships than men). Conformity studies in China where the social group is very important and found much higher conformity rates. His research may only apply to American men (gender and culture bias)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What are the situational variables?

A

Features of an environment, affect the degree to which individuals yield to group pressures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What are the individual variables?

A

Personal characteristics that affect the degree to which individuals yield to group pressures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What are social roles?

A

A part individuals play as members of a social group, which meets the expectations of that situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What study demonstrates social roles?

A

Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What were the aims of Zimbardo’s experiment

A

To see the extent to which people conform to roles of guard/prisoner in a simulation of prison life. Testing dispositional vs situational hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What was the sample in Zimbardo’s study?

A

75 male university student volunteers (told they would be paid $15 a day)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What was wrong with Zimbardo’s sample?

A
  • Small sample
  • Androcentric
  • Same age
  • Volunteers (doing it for money)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What was Zimbardo’s procedure?

A
  1. Mock prison in psychology basement at Stanford
  2. Advertised for students to take part
  3. Students randomly assigned guard or prisoner
  4. For realism, prisoners arrested at home by police, blindfolded, strip-searched, deloused and issued uniform and number
  5. Social roles strictly divided, prisoners daily routine heavily regulated, prisoner names never used
  6. Guards had own uniform, told they had complete power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

What happened with the social roles of the guards and prisoners?

A

They settled into their roles quickly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What is deindiviudation?

A

Taking away someone’s identity - the prisoners had numbers not names

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

What happened to the prisoners after around 36 hours?

A

The pps in the study started to cry and have a mental breakdown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

How many days did it take for the study to be over?

A

6 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

What were Zimbardo’s findings?

A
  1. Guards took their role up with enthusiasm, behaviour increasingly tyrannical and abusive
  2. Guards highlighted difference in social roles by enforced rules and punishment
  3. Within 2 days, prisoners rebelled
  4. Guards put down rebellion with fire extinguishers, prisoners became subdued, depressed and anxious
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

What were the conclusions for Zimbardo’s study?

A

Individuals conform readily to social roles. It revealed the power of the situation to influence people’s behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

What are the positive evaluation points for Zimbardo?

A
  1. Emotionally stable individuals were chosen which increases external validity
  2. Findings can be applied to modern day: Same conformity to social roles was evident in the study in Abu Ghraib, a military prison in Iraq notorious for the torture and abuse of Iraq prisoners by US soldiers in 2003/4. Zimbardo believed that the guards who committed the abuses were the victims of situation factors that made abuse more likely.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

What are the negative evaluation points for Zimbardo’s study?

A
  1. Ethical issues:
    Right to withdraw - a student spoke to Zimbardo because he wanted to leave, Z responded as a superintendent instead of research and persuaded him to stay
    Protection from harm - 5 prisoners left early because of adverse reactions to the physical and mental torment, some guards felt anxious and guilty
  2. Individual differences - not all guards were brutal
  3. Procedure affected by demand characteristics - Reicher and Haslam conducted modern-day replication in UK. Findings different. Prisoners took control, guards harassed. Shows findings aren’t consistent and that people may not conform to social roles in modern day society/
58
Q

What is obedience?

A

Complying with the demands of an authority figure

59
Q

Why does obedience generally have a good influence?

A

Society wouldn’t function in an effective manner otherwise

60
Q

Give an example of negative influences of obedience?

A

The Nazi’s unquestionably killed Jews and Gypsies etc

61
Q

What rights do people in authority have?

A

To give other people orders

62
Q

What was Milgram’s explanation into obedience?

A

Milgram wanted to find out whether ordinary Americans would obey an unjust order from a person of authority

63
Q

What was the aim of Milgram’s experiment?

A

To see if individuals would obey orders of an authority figure that incurred negative consequences

64
Q

What was the sample for Milgram’s study?

A

40 male volunteers

65
Q

What was wrong with Milgram’s sample?

A

Small, ethnocentric, androcentric, age limited and volunteers (paid)

66
Q

What were the people who volunteered for Milgram’s study told?

A

They were told it was a memory test

67
Q

Where was Milgram’s study based?

A

Yale

68
Q

What was the punishment system in Milgram’s study?

A

Increasing electric shocks given to the learner by the teacher if they gave an incorrect answer 15 to 450 volts

69
Q

How did Milgram authenticate his study to participants?

A

The teacher was given a 45V electric shock

70
Q

What was Milgram’s baseline procedure?

A
  1. Genuine participant always had teacher role, confederate learner
  2. Teachers role was to administer a shock every time learner made mistakes
  3. Teacher watched learner being strapped into chair in adjoining room with electrodes attached, teacher also received practice shock
  4. Confederate answered correctly then began to make mistakes, shocks started at 15V and increased in 15V increments to 450
  5. Experiment continued until teacher refused to continue or until 450V was reached and given 4 times
  6. Pps debriefed and taken to meet learner
71
Q

What were Milgram’s baseline findings?

A
  • All participants went to at least 300V
  • 65% of pps went to maximum which was marked as XXX
72
Q

What was the obedience rate for Milgram’s experiment?

A

62%

73
Q

How many pps in Milgram’s study went to 300V?

A

100%

74
Q

What percentage of pps in Milgram’s study went to 450V?

A

65%

75
Q

What were most of the pps showing during Milgram’s experiment?

A

Signs of distress like sweating

76
Q

What were the conclusions for Milgram’s experiment?

A

Under certain circumstances people will willingly go against their moral judgements and will instead obey the demands of a perceived authority figure

77
Q

What type of experiment was Milgram’s study?

A

Controlled observation

78
Q

What were the different IVs in Milgram’s study?

A

Each variation of the study was the IV

79
Q

How did Milgram control for some ethical issues?

A

He debriefed pps by reunited the learner with them (only 2% of pps regretted taking part), consider cost benefit analysis

80
Q

What are the negative evaluation points of Milgram’s baseline study?

A
  1. Demand characteristics - Orne and Holland argued that pps gave very high shocks because they guessed the shocks weren’t real. This is supported by Perry, who found that many pps had been sceptical. One of M’s research assistants divided pps into doubters and believers. This creates a lack of internal validity
  2. Unrepresentative sample - only male pps from America, only gives an insight into obedience in a limited sample that suffers from culture and gender bias so findings may differ across gender and culture making it difficult to generalise to other populations
81
Q

What are the supportive evaluation points of Milgram’s baseline study?

A

Supporting replications:
Blass carried out a statistical analysis of the experiments and studies conducted by other researchers between 1961-85. Later studies found no more or less obedience
Burger found levels of obedience almost identical
This suggests Milgram’s findings still apply today

82
Q

What happened when the pp was paired with an assistant in Milgram’s study?

A

92.5% to 450V

83
Q

What happened in the location variation of Milgram’s study?

A

Obedience fell when the experiment was in less respectable and prestigious surroundings dropped to 47.5% in seedy office

84
Q

AO3 of location variable in Milgram’s study?

A

The drop can be explained by legitimacy of authority, seedy office has lower LoA than Yale meaning they were less likely to take it seriously

85
Q

What happened in the proximity variation of Milgram’s study?

A

Proximity of victim: teacher and learner in same room. Obedience fell when pps forced to see and hear distress caused by their actions (40%)

Touch proximity of victim: teacher had to force the learner’s hand onto electrified plate to get shock. Obedience fell to 30%

Proximity of authority figure: experimenter left room, gave instructions over phone. Obedience fell when supervised less closely

86
Q

AO3 of proximity variable in Milgram’s study?

A

Can be explained through agentic state as authority figure is no longer present, pps feel more responsible for actions. Less likely to see themselves as agents so obedience decreases (20.5%)

87
Q

What happened in the uniform variation of Milgram’s study?

A

In baseline, experimenter wore grey lab coat as symbol of authority. In variation, experiment replaced with ordinary member of public in everyday clothes. Obedience fell to the lowest level of variations

88
Q

AO3 of uniform variable in Milgram’s study?

A

Lack of legitimacy of authority. Ordinary member decreased legitimacy of authority pps less likely to take seriously

89
Q

What are the negative evaluation points of Milgram’s situational variables?

A

Alternative explanation:
Situational variables explanation ignores effect of internal factors such as disposition, personality or obedience e.g., people with authoritarian personality more likely to show blind obedience. Supported by Elms and Milgram who found that those with AP traits more likely to give shocks. Reduces validity.

Obedience alibi:
Milgram’s variations support the view that the situaiton a person finds themselves i mainly responsible for their obedience, has been criticised, psychologists argue it offers an alibi for evil behaviour. Offensive to survivors of Holocaust to suggest Nazis were obeying order and were victims of situational factors beyond their control

90
Q

What is the agentic state?

A

A mental state where we feel no personal responsibility for our behaviour because we believe ourselves to be acting for an authority figure

91
Q

What is the opposite of the Agentic state?

A

Autonomous state

92
Q

What is the Autonomous state?

A

They are free to behave to their own principles and therefore feel a sense of responsibility for their own actions

93
Q

What is an Agentic shift?

A

Milgram suggested that this occurs when a person perceives someone else as an authority figure. When they go from an autonomous state to an agentic state

94
Q

What are binding factors?

A

Aspects of the situation which will allow the person to minimise the damaging effect of their behaviour. They could shift responsibility onto the victim

95
Q

What is legitimacy of authority?

A

We are socialised to recognise authority of people like parents, police and teachers. We are willing to give up some of our independence and to hand control of our behaviour to them

96
Q

What research supports the agentic state?

A

Milgram: researcher placed in a different room to real participant (teacher). Pps instructed to give shocks via telephone. Resulted in fall of obedience from 65% to 20.5%, pps shifted to an autonomous state, saw themselves being responsible.

97
Q

What research supports legitimacy of authority?

A

Milgram: Pps more likely to obey researcher when took place in prestigious setting (65%) compared to run-down office (47.5%)

Bickamn: found when he asked people in NY to lend money to a strange for a parking metre, would obey 49% of time when dressed in street clothes, increased to 92% in security guard’s unfiorm.

98
Q

What is a negative evaluation point against agentic state?

A

Evidence to show obedience is not always due to an agentic shift. Mandel said when Nazi soldiers were ordered to shoot civilians in Poland, were told they could be assigned other duties so personality could play a role in explaining obedience

99
Q

What is an Authoritarian personality?

A

A type of personality that Adorno argued that they were susceptible to obey people who are in authority. They are submissive of those with a higher status and dismissive of inferior.

100
Q

What are the authoritarian personality characteristics?

A
  • Extremely respectful to those in authority
  • Believe that strong and powerful leaders are needed to enforce traditional values
  • Hostile to people of inferior social status
101
Q

What are the origins of an authoritarian personality?

A

Formed in childhood because of harsh parenting as it creates impossibly high standards and sever criticism. This creates resentment and hostility but the child is unable to express this out of fear of punishment os child displaces fears out of others who are weaker

102
Q

What was Adorno’s procedure?

A

Attitudes toward racial minorities were measured in 2000 middle class, white Americans. The F-Scale was also used to measure the different components that make up an authoritarian personality. The scale is a way of measuring personality type

103
Q

What were Adorno’s findings?

A

Those with an authoritarian personality were:
- Contemptuous of those thought to be ‘weak’
- Conscious of other peoples status
- Had fixed stereotypes about other people
A strong postive correlation was found between those with an authoritarian personality and prejudice

104
Q

What was Adorno’s conclusion?

A

People with an authoritarian personality tend to be very obedience to authority because they have enormous respect for authority. They also show contempt for people they perceive as having inferior social status

105
Q

What are the positive evaluation points for authoritarian personality?

A

Elms and Milgram found when 20 obedient pps from Milgram’s research (who delivered 450V) were questioned using the F-scale, they scored higher on authoritarianism. Also view experimenter as more admirable and the learner less so. This supports Adorno that AP makes us more likely to obey

106
Q

What are the negative evaluation points for authoritarian personality?

A

Ignores external causes of obedience:
Evidence from Milgram shows situational variables have greater effect on obedience than disposition. Levels of obedience dropped when researcher gave orders over phone. Bickman showed wearing uniform doubles obedience (49 to 92%). Personality has limited effect on obedience it appears external factors are more important

Cannot explain group obedience:
Unlikely that high levels of obedience, racism and semitism seen in Germany in WW11 could be due to disposition factors. Extremely unlikely that whole population possessed AP

Methodological weaknesses:
Milgram carried out a lab study but Adorno measured people’s attitudes using a scaled. Rating scales are criticised as they are subject to social desirability as pps may not tell the truth to look desirable to the researcher. Questionnaires may not be a valid measure of personality which reduces validity of disposition explanations

107
Q

What are the ethical issues in research into social influence?

A

Deception: Asch misinformed pps of true aim of study. Milgram told pps study was something else, misleads pps into believing that someone was actually shocked. Zimbardo didn’t inform pps of some aspects e.g., arrested at home so didn’t give full informed consent

Protection from harm: Pps in Milgram’s study showed signs of distress. Zimbardo acknowledges the study should be been stopped earlier as some experiences severe emotional distress.
However Milgram and Zimbardo debriefed and carried out psychological assessments

108
Q

What is resistance to social influence?

A

The ways to which individuals attempt to withstand perceived attempts to threaten freedom of choice. (ability to withstand the majority influence or group pressures)

109
Q

What is social support?

A

The idea that you have people in your presence who are resisting conformity or obeying can help you do the same. These people act as models to show that resistance is possible

110
Q

What does Milgram’s research show about social support in resisting social influence?

A

When there was a disobedient confederate in a variation of the study, conformity then dropped to only 10%

111
Q

What research supports social support to resistance to social influence for conformity?

A

Allen and Levine: Not only did conformity rate decrease when dissenter, were present, but this occurred even when the dissenter work thick glasses and said he had difficulty with his vision

112
Q

What limitation of resistance to social influence was shown in Asch’s study?

A

If a non-conforming dissenter began to conform against them so did the naïve participant. Therefore showing the dissent is not long lasting

113
Q

What is locus of control?

A

The extent to which individuals believe they have control over the events that influence their lives

114
Q

What are the characteristics of internal locus of control?

A
  • They can control events in their lives
  • What happens to them is consequence of their own ability and effort
  • More likely to rely less on the opinion of others
  • MORE likely to RESIST social influence
115
Q

What are the characteristics of external locus of control?

A
  • They have a sense that things just happen to them and are largely out of their control
  • What happens to them is determined by external factors such as friends, parents or luck
  • Take less personal responsibility for their actions
  • LESS likely to RESIST social influence
116
Q

Who believed the concept that individuals are more likely to resist social pressures if they have high internal LOC?

A

Rotter (1966) (people with high internal LOC tend to be more confident and need less social approval.

117
Q

What research is there to support locus of control?

A

Crowne et al: completed an Asch-type experience and then measured whether pps had an internal or external LOC. He found that internals conformed less than externals

Holland: repeated Milgram’s baseline study and found 37% of internals did not continue to highest shock level. Only 23% of externals didn’t continue. Internals showed greater resistance to authority. This increases the validity of LOC

118
Q

What research is there that contradicts locus of control?

A

Twenge et al: Meta-analysis over 40 year period of Americans. Over this time people have become more resistant to social influence, increasingly believing in fate suggestive of internal LOC

Correlational evidence: fails to establish cause and effect that internal LOC causes a person to defy authority or not conform. Could be unknown variable apart from type of LOC that causes defiance such as personality so explanation lacks validity

119
Q

What is minority influence?

A

A type of social influence that motivates individuals to reject established majority group norms

120
Q

What type of social influence is minority influence most likely to lead to?

A

Internalisation - both public and private beliefs changed

121
Q

What three factors are the main process in minority influence?

A
  • Consistency
  • Flexibility
  • Commitment
122
Q

What is consistency in terms of minority SI?

A

The minority is deemed most effective when they keep to the same beliefs. It draws the attention to the minorities point of view causing the majority to rethink their own views. This consistency leads the majority to doubt themselves which can lead to behaviour change

Synchronic consistency - when members of the minority are all saying the same thing

Diachronic consistency - they have been saying the same thing for some time now.

123
Q

What is flexibility in terms of minority SI?

A

Members of the minority need to be prepared to adapt their point of view and accept reasonable and valid counter arguments. The key is to strike a balance between consistency and flexibility

124
Q

What is commitment in terms of minority SI?

A

A minority need to be dedicated. This commitment can be demonstrated by taking part in extreme activities to draw attention.
This greater commitment may persuade memory group members to take them seriously. This is the augmentation principle. It states that if risks are involved in putting forward a particular point of view others take those who express those views more seriously
The suffragettes took part in many extreme activities

125
Q

What is the snowball effect?

A

This is where gradually more people convert to the minority, turn it into the majority e.g., Women’s right to vote

126
Q

What research supports consistency in social influence?

A

Moscovici: Draws attention to minorities POV causing majority to rethink and doubt themselves leading to behaviour change. 2/6 pps were confederates
Consistent condition: 2 confederates consistently called the blue slides green on all trials
Inconsistent condition: the two confederates called the slides green 24 times and blue 12 times
A control group also judged the colour of the slides without any confederates present.
Findings:
Consistent condition: pps called slides green in 8.42% of trials and 32% of these pps called a slide green at least once
Inconsistent condition: pps called the slides green on only 1.25% of the trials.

Wood et al: meta-analysis of 97 studies of minority influence found consistent minorities most influential, validate importance of consistency

127
Q

What research contradicts consistency in social influence?

A

Being overly consistent can backfire. If minority consistency adheres to their message without any attempt to modify, they could be viewed as being inflexible and rigid which may cause majority to ignore

128
Q

What research which supports commitment in social influence?

A

Xie et al: found pps communicated on a social network with people who were committed to an alternative viewpoint to their own, this had the most significant influence on them adopting the point of view

129
Q

What research which opposes commitment in social influence?

A

Extreme activities could lead to the minority being viewed as deviant and troublemakers. Members of the majority may avoid aligning themselves with the minority position because they do not want to be seen as deviant themselves

130
Q

What research supports flexibility in social influence?

A

Bremerhaven and Brilmayer: Tested a mock jury situation, group members discussed amount of compensation to be paid to someone involved in ski lift accident. Found when a confederate put forward an alternative POV and refused to change position, this had no influence on the group, when showed flexibility they had influence.

131
Q

What are the positive evaluation points for Moscovici’s study?

A

High controls - lab experiment Consistent minorities have a greater influence on private attitudes.

132
Q

What are the negative evaluation points for Moscovici’s study?

A
  • Lab experiment: Lacks EV
    -Only used female participants: not generalisable to males
  • Unethical: Involved deceit so no informed consent could be given. (may be stressed) Doesn’t identify important factors in minority influence Also, the amount that agreed were relatively small
133
Q

What are the evaluation points against minority influence?

A

CC and F may not be the most important factor in minority influence
Research indicates that if the majority identifies with the minority, they are more likely to change their own views in line with those of the minority
One study showed that a straight majority were influenced more by a minority arguing for gay rights if the minority were straight rather than gay (Maass et al)
This is because the straight majority identified with the straight minority

134
Q

What is social change?

A

This occurs when whole societies, rather than individuals, adopt new attitudes, beliefs and ways of doing things.

E.G: Women’s suffrage, civil rights movement, gay rights

135
Q

How can social change be positive?

A

Increased rights for women’s suffrage that helped develop western cultures in the 1900s

136
Q

How can social change be negative?

A

The adoption of society of eugenic beliefs which saw different races as being inferior, leading to mass extermination e.g., Nazis

137
Q

How can social change occur through minority influence?

A
  • Drawing attention: civil rights marches
  • Consistency: marches and demonstrations over years
  • Commitment: willing to suffer to be taken more seriously, mob violence
  • Snowball effect: once a few members of the majority start to move towards the minority, it will gather momentum. It will then reach a tipping point in 1964 US civil rights act passed
138
Q

How does social change occur through normative social influence?

A

Individuals are led to believe that the majority are behaving differently to the way they behave they may change their behaviour to avoid being seen as socially deviant

139
Q

What lessons about social change come from conformity research?

A

Conform due to NSI. Environmental campaigners use psychological tactics like printing normative messages on bins to bring social change

140
Q

What lessons about social change come from obedience research?

A

Milgram’s research demonstrates how social change may be more likely if the changes start small and increase gradually (gradual commitment). Once a small instruction is obeyed (administering 15V) it becomes much more difficult to resist a bigger one (30V).

141
Q

What research is there to support NSI (Majority social influence) in bringing social change?

A

Nolan: investigated the social influence processes led to a reduction energy consumption in a community. They hung messages on front doors every week for a month. They key message was the most residents were trying to reduce energy usage. As a control some had different messages. Nolan found significant decreases in energy usage in 1st group. This shows conformity can lead to social change

142
Q

What evaluation point goes against minoirty influence in bringing social change?

A

The potential for minorities to influence social change is limited because they are seen as deviant from majority. Members of maj may avoid aligning themselves with minority because don’t want to be seen as deviant. This may prevent social change because they are portrayed as deviant

AQA A-Level Psychology (11 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions