Genetic Explanation for Sz - Biological Explanation Flashcards

1
Q

What are concordance rates?

A

Probability that a family member will also develop a disease

e.g. Sz (expressed as a %)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the genetic explanation of Sz focus on?

A

Focuses on idea that Sz is linked to a gene

Passed on in families

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does the genetic explanation suggest about genes and Sz?

A

Genes predispose individuals to Sz

If we share more genes with a family member and they have Sz it make us more likely to also get Sz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the likelihood of 3rd degree relatives developing Sz if one of them has it?

A

Doubles likelihood of you developing Sz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the likelihood of 1st degree relatives developing Sz if one of them has it?

A

10% chance you will develop Sz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the likelihood of MZ twins developing Sz if one of them has it?

A

share 100% of genes

50-60% chance of developing Sz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the supporting evidence/strengths of the genetic explanation for Sz?

A

Heston (1966)

Tsang et al (1999)

Psychology in society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the refuting evidence/weaknesses of the genetic explanation for Sz?

A

Reductionist

Nature-nurture debate

Rosenthal’s diathesis-stress model of Sz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is Heston (1966) supporting evidence for the genetic explanation for Sz?

A

Heston studied individuals who were born between 1915-1945 to Sz mothers and adopted from birth

Rate of Sz in those born to Sz mothers was 10.6% compared with 0% in those not born to Sz individuals

Supports concordance rate evidence for 1st degree relative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is Tsang et al (1999) supporting evidence for the genetic explanation for Sz?

A

Conducted a case study of 12 adults who were 1st degree relative of patients with Sz

Evaluated for negative and cognitive symptoms of Sz and found it was possible to both identify such symptoms and potentially reverse these using a drug called Risperidone

Supports genetic component of Sz in 1st degree relative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is psychology in society a strength of the genetic explanation for Sz?

A

Recognising genetic aspect of Sz is important for people with a history of Sz in their families

Alerts them that they are at higher risk of developing that disorder themselves

Based on this information they could avoid stressful occupations or drug use that may trigger the condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why is reductionism a weakness of the genetic explanation for Sz?

A

The explanation is an example of genetic reductionism

Focuses on parts rather than the ‘whole’ characteristic

Such genetic explanations ignore environmental factors such as nurture and the role that parenting and stressors may play in the onset of Sz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is nature-nurture a weakness of the genetic explanation for Sz?

A

Only studying individuals within the same environment which doesn’t allow for question between whether Sz is genetic or environmental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is Rosenthal’s diathesis-stress model of Sz refuting evidence of the genetic explanation for Sz?

A

Twin and adoption studies don’t show 100% concordance in people with the same genes

Suggests that something non-biological is at work too, like the environment a person lives in

Genes may give a person a predisposition to develop Sz but a trigger such as stress is needed to bring the symptoms out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly