geo coasts fieldwork Flashcards
(40 cards)
pfwk interpretation of data and whether proven 1
The data shows as you go further north, the gradient gradually gets flatter disproving the original hypothesis
pfwk key concept 2
The amount of risk is increased by the population present and the value of the properties that could be damaged therefore we need Zoopla to determine the prices
pfwk method and data presentation 2
Flood risk survey shown in a table
pfwk data interpretation and whether proven 2
all areas had a low flood risk showing that good decisions had been made
all areas received between the range of 2 to -6 out of 45 therefore proving the original hypothesis
pfwk evaluation 2
the zoopla prices are more estimated values so it’s not as accurate, we don’t know the value of anything inside the houses
pfwk sub-hypothesis 3
The most effective forms of coastal managements were where you had sea walls, rip rap (rock armour) and beach replenishment
pfwk key concept 3
using geology maps, we can investigate the source of different rock types and investigate whether they’re eroded easily and therefore if hard or soft forms of coastal management is needed
pfwk method and data presentation 3
cost benefit analysis shown in a table
bipolar evaluation shown in a radar chart
pfwk data interpretation and whether proven 3
the data showed that the benefits in Beesands (3.12), Torcross (2.19) and Sunnydale (17.1) outweighed the costs and ergo proving the original hypothesis
The radar chart shows the coastal management in the areas were highly effective against flooding with low construction costs but high maintenance costs, also proving the hypothesis
pfwk evaluation 3
They are good strategies but considering they cost a lot and not a lot of people live there, it’s not considered to be as important
secondary data in order of usefulness
1) Geology map
2) Zoopla
3) Windrose
methods in order of safest
1) beach profiles
2) Cost benefit analysis
3) bipolar evaluation
4) flood risk survey
methods in order of accessibility
1) beach profiles
2) bipolar evaluation
3) flood risk survey
4) cost benefit analysis
methods in order of answering the question
1) cost benefit analysis (assesses all elements)
2) beach profiles
3) flood risk survey
4) bipolar evaluation
outcomes in order of reliability
1) cost benefit analysis
2) flood risk survey
3) beach profiles
4) bipolar evaluation
outcomes in order of accuracy
1) beach profiles
2) cost benefit analysis
3) flood risk survey
4) bipolar evaluation
outcomes in order of validity
1) cost benefit analysis
2) beach profiles
3) flood risk survey
4) bipolar evaluation
human fieldwork key hypothesis
The quality of life will be better in Chillington than in Slapton
why we chose the human fieldwork location
safety - rural areas are safe
accessibility - we can walk because everything is in close proximity + A379 so we can do it all in one trip
question- links to our question
definition of a rural area
an area with a population of less than 10,000 people, sparsely populated and either left as wilderness or with farming/tourism as a major economic activity
definition of quality of life
the standard of health, comfort, and happiness experienced by an individual or group
hfwk sub-hypothesis 1 and whether proven
The quality of the environment will be better in Slapton - proven
hfwk sub-hypothesis 2 and whether proven
Service decline has been greatest in Slapton - proven
hfwk key concept 1
Environmental quality will increase with distance from the A379 because those transport links bring cars and therefore pollution, also Slapton is in the AONB therefore the environment is a lot more protected than Chillington