Grammar and Pragmatics Flashcards

1
Q

What does grammar enable us to do?

A

Combine words of our language in different ways so that they can convey different meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Components of grammar

A

Syntax

Morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Syntax

A

Deals with organisation of words into large structures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Morphology

A

Dealing with the analysis of word structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Testing syntactic development

A
Shown two videos of a dog and a lion 
Novel verb used "weefed" 
Explained what this made up word meant 
Asked which video the lion weefed the dog 
Two year old points to correct video
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Inflectional morphology uses

A
Marks.. 
Tense (walk, walkED) 
Person (I walk, he walkS)
Number (dog, dogS)
Possession (my dog'S bone)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do you know when children understand the function of inflectional morphemes?

A
The wug test (Berko, 1958) 
Told this is a wug (novel noun) 
The shown there is another one 
Asked there are two \_\_\_\_
If they say wugs then we infer that they have abstract knowledge of inflectional morphemes to reflect the plurality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Developmental trajectory of morphological productivity

A
  • Discover and inflection (make errors of omission) before this
  • Begin to over apply the inflection (he blewed it up, I like mouses - overregularisations)
  • Manage to balance applying inflectional productively and remembering exceptions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Chomsky (1965, 1981)

A

Argued that children cannot learn by creatively copying what they hear around them because of…
The poverty of the stimulus problem
The no negative evidence problem

There are inborn structures in the brain (language acquisition device - LAD) which allow us to organise what we hear into speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The poverty of the stimulus problem

A

Lack of hearing this stimulus before

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The no negative evidence problem

A

No direct feedback that what they say is wrong, nothing to stop children overgeneralising their grammar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a Universal Grammar?

A

Grammatical categories and principles used to generate the grammatical sentences of the world’s languages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Problems with UG

A

No complete account of…
What innate knowledge makes up UG
How children could use it to learn their specific language they are exposed to
Little consideration of possible learning algorithms or children as social beings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Constructivist approaches to language learning

A

There is no problem of the poverty of the stimulus nor of no negative evidence: grammar is learnable an therefore the proposal of an innate grammar is redundant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the emphasis on in the constructivist approach to learning language?

A

Social context of development

Learning mechanisms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the challenge in the constructivist approach to learning language?

A

No fully worked out account of how different learning mechanisms interact to allow children to creatively produce language based on what they have previously heard and stored in memory

17
Q

Learning mechanisms

A
Intention reading 
Imitation 
Statistical learning 
Generalisation 
Analogy making
18
Q

Pragmatics

A

The ability to use language in the context in which we are speaking and the people we are speaking to

19
Q

Pragmatic skills

A
Turn taking 
Using the right expression to refer to something (choosing between he vs the dog vs the spotty dog) 
Understanding implicatures (I ate some biscuits, adults assume this implies I didn't eat them all, children under 4 don't) 
Being able to talk in different registers (talking to a friend vs in a job interview) 
Narrative skills (talking about things not in the here and now)
20
Q

Pragmatic development - infancy

A

Early inclination to engage in conversation, to take turns, to engage one’s interlocutor and check for and maintain comprehension of interest

21
Q

Referential choice preschool years

A

Children sometimes refer to something in an ambiguous way

  • Pointing to something their addressee cannot see
  • Referring to someone as ‘he’ or ‘she’ when the addressee does not know who this is
22
Q

Clarification of ambiguous referencing

A

Children respond well to questions for clarification and this may help them to learn how to refer to things better in the future

23
Q

Scaffolding language development

A

Child-directed speech or motherese
Following in - commenting on object of child’s attention
Adjusting language to child’s level
Expansion of child’s telegraphic speech
Recasts of incomplete or unconventional speech
Clarification requests

24
Q

Atypical development

A

Problems due to…
Hearing loss or difficulty in producing speech sounds
Learning disabilities (Down Syndrome)
Delayed communication or unusual language is one of the diagnostic features of Autism

25
Q

Developmental Language Disorder (DLD)

A

A language impairment that cannot be explained by hearing loss, other developmental disorders or brain injury
Affects 2 in 30 children yet the disorder is hardly heard of

26
Q

Children begin to combine words into sentences some time around ______

A

Their second birthday