Holocaust Flashcards
(151 cards)
Zimbardo (2007), Milgram experiment - how it worked
The task is straightforward: one of you will be the “teacher” who gives the “learner” a set of word pairings to memorize. During the test, the teacher will give each key word, and the learner must respond with the correct association. When the learner is right, the teacher gives a verbal reward, such as “Good” or “That’s right.” When the learner is wrong, the teacher is to press a lever on an impressive-looking apparatus that delivers an immediate shock to punish the error
The tenth level (150 volts) is “Strong Shock”; the 17th level (255 volts) is “Intense Shock”; the 25th level (375 volts) is “Danger, Severe Shock.” At the 29th and 30th levels (435 and 450 volts) the control panel is marked simply with an ominous XXX: the pornography of ultimate pain and power.
As the shock levels increase in intensity, so do the learner’s screams, saying he does not think he wants to continue.
As you continue up to even more dangerous shock levels, there is no sound coming from your pupil’s shock chamber
Most participants dissented from time to time and said they did not want to go on, but the researcher would prod them to continue.
the situation was what mattered.
Zimbardo (2007), Milgram experiment - results
two of every three (65 percent) of the volunteers went all the way up to the maximum shock level of 450 volts
Over the course of a year, Milgram carried out 19 different experiments - e.g. transplanted his laboratory to a run-down office building in downtown Bridgeport, Connecticut, and repeated the experiment as a project ostensibly of a private research firm with no connection to Yale.
made hardly any difference
Milgram’s large sample—a thousand ordinary citizens from varied backgrounds—makes the results of his obedience studies among the most generalizable in all the social sciences
Zimbardo (2007), Milgram experiment - maximum obedience
Make the subject a member of a “teaching team,” in which the job of pulling the shock lever to punish the victim is given to another person (a confederate), while the subject assists with other parts of the procedure.
more likely to shock when the learner was remote than in proximity.
Zimbardo (2007), Milgram experiment - resistance to authority
Provide social models—peers who rebel.
Participants also refused to deliver the shocks if the learner said he wanted to be shocked; that’s masochistic, and they are not sadists.
Zimbardo (2007), Thomas Blass
analyzed the rates of obedience in eight studies conducted in the United States and nine replications in European, African, and Asian countries. He found comparably high levels of compliance in all. The 61 percent mean obedience rate found in the U.S. was matched by the 66 percent rate found across all the other national samples. The degree of obedience was not affected by the timing of the studies, which ranged from 1963 to 1985.
Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963)
half a dozen psychiatrists had certified him as “normal.”
“The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal.”
Zimbardo (2007), Interviews of several dozen torturers, Zimbardo, Huggins, Haritos-Fatouros
sadists are selected out of the training process by trainers because they are not controllable.
torturers were not unusual or deviant in any way prior to practicing their new roles, nor were there any persisting deviant tendencies or pathologies among any of them in the years following their work as torturers and executioners. Their transformation was entirely explainable as being the consequence of a number of situational and systemic factors, such as the training they were given to play this new role; their group camaraderie; acceptance of the national security ideology; and their learned belief in socialists and Communists as enemies of their state.
Zimbardo (2007), Mark Sageman, al-Qaeda
normalcy of 400 al-Qaeda members. Three-quarters came from the upper or middle class. Ninety percent came from caring, intact families.
Zimbardo (2007), the most dramatic instances of directed behaviour change…
occur w the the systematic manipulation of the most mundane aspects of human nature over time in confining settings.
This is why evil is so pervasive. Its temptation is just a small turn away
Zimbardo, Stamford Prison Experiment 1971
Subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of “prisoner” or “guard”. Those assigned to play the role of guard were given sticks and sunglasses; those assigned to play the prisoner role were arrested by the Palo Alto police department, deloused, forced to wear chains and prison garments, and transported to the basement of the Stanford psychology department, which had been converted into a makeshift jail.
Several of the guards became progressively more sadistic - particularly at night when they thought the cameras were off, despite being picked by chance out of the same pool as the prisoners.
The experiment very quickly got out of hand. A riot broke out on day two. One prisoner developed a psychosomatic rash all over his body upon finding out that his “parole” had been turned down. After only 6 days (of a planned two weeks), the experiment was shut down, for fear that one of the prisoners would be seriously hurt.
Although the intent of the experiment was to examine captivity, its result has been used to demonstrate the impressionability and obedience of people when provided with a legitimizing ideology and social and institutional support.
Lifton (talk, 1996), mystical component of genocide
- Non-rational
- World perfected by destroying ppl
Lifton (talk, 1996), Holocaust as template for genocidal mentality?
Nazis = best model for genocidal mentality, which applies to all other genocides, consisting of:
- Support for genocide/ acquiescence in
- Participation in/ support for actions/ policy which if carried out would lead to genocide
Lifton (talk, 1996), sequence of events leading to genocide (Holocaust template which applies to other genocides)
- Extreme historical trauma. Near destruction of ppl - defeat in WW1
- Post-ww1, revitalising ideologies - promising to make strong again
- Revitalising ideology becomes genocidal. Group must be destroyed
- Genocidal institutions built
- Intellectionals/ professionals essential - rationale, organisation, technology, lead in carrying out genocide
- Professional killers
- Crossing of genocidal threshold
- Over this, bureaucratic momentum, can’t turn back
- Nazis - decision 1941 - middle echilons trying to figure out what fuhrer wanted but influencing genocide w their cruel behaviour, ensuring some completed before order given
Lifton (talk, 1996), reason why we study genocide
prevent recurrence
Israeli dentist in Haifa - spent three yrs in Auschwitz
Painful interview w Lifton. This world is not this world. Meant that whatever comfort in immediate surrounding, if you’ve known Auschwitz, know genocide which lies beneath surface
Lifton (talk, 1996), evil
anyone can become evil:
- Mengele not so diff from rest of us
- Satan = human creation
- Must recognise universal human potential for evil
Lifton (talk, 1996), modification of Arendt’s banality of evil thesis
Would modify - evil not banal. When evil perpetrated over time, they were no longer banal, they themselves took on evil
Lifton (talk, 1996), antisemitic view of Jews and culture
Hitler - Nordic only culture-creating race.
Jewish race only destroys culture
Nordic race infected by Jewish race, something must be done to remove infection
Lifton (talk, 1996), Nazi doctors and biomedical vision
One Nazi doc interviewed:
- Joined after Nazi rally when said national Socialism nothing but applied biology
Process seen as biological:
- Biocracy
- Run in the name of biological principles
- Example of dangers of claiming scientific truth for genocidal project
- • Nazis told docs not selfish 1-on-1 docs. Docs to the folk. Biological soldiers, cultivators of the genes. Contributing to revitalisation of own people
Lifton (talk, 1996), 5 steps leading Nazi docs to genocide
- Coercive sterilisation. Leading Swiss German, Ansrew Dean, more fanatical geneticist than Nazi, but Nazis offered op to remove bad genes
- Euthanasia - medicalised killing of children. Created by leading German psychiatrist before Germans. Former Nazi doc said easy to kill v young children. Sedatives - seemed like putting to sleep more than killing
- ‘Euthanasia’ - systematic medicalised killing of adults. Gas chambers. Mechanism and practices and personnel for concentration camps. Head = Karl Brandt. ‘decent’ Nazi - well spoken. Saw mission as getting rid of thuggish Nazi elements. Did most of the work among Nazis bc most able. Only programme protested/ discontinued in Germany bc fam mems of many disappearing. Unofficially continued.
- Euthanasia brought into camps, becoming death camps
- Auschwitz and other camps, genocide
Lifton (talk, 1996), medicalization of murder
Gas cock seen as syringe, medicalised
Syringe belongs in hand of physician
Doctors performed selections at the ramp
Lifton (talk, 1996), How could the Nazis do what they did?
Doubling.
- Killers undergo pattern of doubling - form of second self in extreme environment
- Nazis back to Germany on leave from Ausch then be normal husband/ father
- Auschwitz self - normal functions = killing
- This self seems to function as if separate element
- Holistic function - enables adaptation to killing, to vulgar environment, whole style of existence
- Takes away dirty work - can consid other self not responsible
- Can function at unconscious level
- Wanted to adapt bc tho nightmares over 1st days didn’t want to be transferred to eastern front, where death more likely
- Part of adaptation - socialisation process. More experiences Ausch docs wld go with to selection and show how it’s done. We save few lives by allowing into camp
- Splitting of portion of self from rest
- e.g. Schindler - stayed a Nazi - drunk w compatriots. But rescuer self existed alongside, got stronger towards the end
- Doubling could be life-saving - e.g. Ausch survivors
- In doubling, disavowal of what one does. So what they experienced wasn’t killing - knew what doing but didn’t take on the meaning of killing. Pattern by which one can adapt to evil
- Nazi docs still completely responsible, however
- Arrival in Ausch dimension of evil shocking even to cruel Nazis. Needed some socialisation
Lifton (talk, 1996), How could the Nazis do what they did?
Doubling of victims
• Doubling could be life-saving
Lifton (talk, 1996), doubling and evil
• Doubling - psychological means by which one calls forth evil potential or self