Industrial and Agricultural changes (1917-85) Flashcards
(116 cards)
How did early Bolshevik rhetoric about worker and peasant control contrast with the economic realities after the October Revolution?
The Bolsheviks’ slogans gave the impression that factories, industries, businesses, and farms were now under the control of workers and peasants.
The aristocracy and bourgeoisie were seen as defeated and no longer capable of exploiting the proletariat.
However, Lenin and the Bolshevik leadership understood that this vision was far from reality.
Equal distribution of goods was impossible without actual goods to distribute—something the economy, devastated by war and revolution, could not provide.
Enthusiasm for worker and peasant control clashed with the need for state intervention to rebuild the economy.
What economic challenges did the Bolsheviks face immediately after taking power in 1917?
The economy was in ruins due to the impact of the First World War and the disruption caused by the October Revolution.
Workers and peasants were acting independently, often without direction or coordination with the Bolshevik leadership.
The new government had to find a way to gain control and manage the economy effectively while still adhering to socialist ideals.
Lenin and the Bolsheviks understood that restoring order and production might require limiting the independence of workers and reintroducing centralized control.
What was Lenin’s approach to transitioning from capitalism to socialism?
Lenin admitted there was no clear blueprint for moving from capitalism to socialism and eventually to communism.
He proposed a period of trial and error, acknowledging the need for flexibility and pragmatic solutions.
The initial phase, called state capitalism, involved using the existing bourgeois specialists and managers because of their technical and administrative expertise.
Lenin planned to work with these groups temporarily, until Bolshevik-trained experts could take over.
A key challenge was maintaining Bolshevik control while dealing with workers and peasants who had taken independent action in the wake of the revolution.
What were the key measures of Lenin’s initial economic policy in 1917?
The Land Decree of October 1917 abolished private ownership of land, declaring land was now in the hands of “the people.”
The Decree on Workers’ Control of November 1917 placed factory control in the hands of industrial workers.
On 27 December 1917, all private banks were nationalised and merged with the State Bank to form the People’s Bank of the Russian Republic.
These measures were intended to empower workers and peasants but created significant economic disruption.
What were the negative consequences of early worker and peasant control over the economy?
Workers’ councils often granted themselves large pay increases, which caused inflation and did not improve productivity.
Many managers were dismissed or violently removed, especially by workers taking revenge for past mistreatment.
The loss of industrial and technical expertise further harmed economic output.
The lack of coordination and strategic planning led the Bolsheviks to realise the need for more centralized economic management.
How did the Bolsheviks begin to reassert control over the economy in late 1917?
In December 1917, the Supreme Council of the National Economy (Vesenkha) was established to oversee and supervise economic activity.
This marked the start of increased government involvement in the economy.
The initial period up to the summer of 1918 showed the tensions between worker self-management and the need for central planning.
The pressures of civil war would soon necessitate even greater state control over the economy.
Why was War Communism introduced during the Russian Civil War?
It was introduced to supply the Red Army with enough food and resources to win the civil war.
The extreme conditions demanded greater government control over the economy.
Some historians argue War Communism was driven by communist ideology; others believe it was a pragmatic response to chaos caused by WWI and the civil war.
It marked a shift from early attempts at worker control to centralised state control.
What was the ideological basis behind War Communism?
War Communism aligned with the long-term Bolshevik goal of abolishing private enterprise.
Some Bolsheviks saw WWI as destroying the old capitalist system, opening the door to building socialism on Marxist lines.
Inflation was misinterpreted by some as evidence of capitalism’s collapse and liberation through bartering.
This led to premature large-scale nationalisation, such as the June 1918 nationalisation of all industries with 10+ workers.
The leadership saw civil war chaos as an opportunity to extend state control, influenced by revolutionary optimism.
What practical factors influenced the introduction of War Communism?
The Russian economy was near total collapse, and drastic state measures were needed to survive.
Winning the civil war required efficient resource distribution, which necessitated central planning.
Many European countries had introduced state control during WWI for similar reasons—this wasn’t purely ideological.
The need to stabilise production and distribution led to forced restructuring.
How was War Communism a reaction to early Bolshevik excesses?
Initial worker-control policies proved unworkable in a civil war context.
The abolition of army ranks was reversed to restore discipline.
Factory managers were reintroduced to impose order in industry.
The Bolsheviks realised that giving power directly to the workers without oversight hindered productivity and wartime mobilisation.
What were the main features of War Communism?
Nationalisation of all industry without compensation; only workplaces with fewer than 10 workers were exempt.
All industry was placed under the control of the Supreme Council of the National Economy (Vesenkha).
Workers’ Councils were replaced by hierarchical management structures to restore discipline.
Harsh, military-style discipline was enforced, including the death penalty for striking workers.
The unemployed were conscripted into Labour Armies for state projects like road building.
Workers were expected to volunteer for unpaid Communist Saturdays, serving the Party.
All private trade was banned, but a black market emerged due to the state’s inability to meet demand.
Money was devalued by inflation, leading to a barter economy; wages were often paid in goods instead of cash.
Why was the NEP introduced in 1921?
War Communism had failed to convert communist ideology into sustainable policy, especially after the civil war ended.
The social, economic, and political crisis of 1921 forced the Bolsheviks to shift policy direction.
The New Economic Policy was introduced as a pragmatic response to growing unrest and economic collapse.
It marked a retreat from War Communism and a move towards a mixed economy to stabilise the country.
What were the key economic reasons for ending War Communism and introducing the NEP?
By 1921, heavy industry production had fallen to 20% of 1913 levels; some sectors had stopped functioning altogether.
Food production dropped to just 48% of 1913 levels, leading to mass famine and starvation.
Transport and distribution systems had collapsed, making it difficult to move goods.
Diseases such as typhus and smallpox spread due to malnutrition, killing over 20 million people in the 1920s.
Soldiers returning from war needed reintegration into civilian life, further straining the economy.
War Communism could not meet the demands of the post-war environment.
Why was War Communism unpopular with the Russian people?
Rationing was based on class: Red Army and industrial workers got the most, bourgeoisie often received nothing.
Factory workers resented the return of managers and strict hierarchies, undermining earlier promises of self-management.
Government control felt increasingly authoritarian and disconnected from workers’ needs.
The population saw state repression and control intensify, causing widespread dissatisfaction.
What was the Tambov Rising and why was it significant?
What was the Tambov Rising and why was it significant?
A major peasant uprising in central Russia (1920–21) triggered by grain requisitioning and threats to the mir (village commune).
Peasants violently resisted requisition teams, especially in the Volga basin, North Caucasus, and Western Siberia.
The Tambov Revolt required 50,000 Red Army troops to suppress it.
Its scale and seriousness highlighted rural anger and increased pressure to change policy.
What happened in the Kronstadt Mutiny and what impact did it have on Bolshevik policy?
The mutiny occurred at the Kronstadt naval base outside Petrograd in 1921.
Sailors—once key supporters of the Revolution—rebelled against Bolshevik authoritarianism.
Their slogan was “Soviets without Bolsheviks,” calling for more worker control and less party dominance.
Though the mutiny was crushed, it deeply shocked Lenin and the leadership.
Lenin described it as lighting up the situation “like a flash of lightning.”
It became a key catalyst for the introduction of the NEP, showing that continued repression was unsustainable.
What did the NEP represent in terms of economic policy?
It marked a retreat from the extreme centralisation of War Communism.
The NEP introduced a mixed economy, allowing a degree of private enterprise alongside state control.
It aimed to revive production, restore trade, and ease tensions with peasants and workers.
Lenin saw it as a necessary, temporary concession to rebuild the economy and retain Bolshevik power.
What was the NEP and when was it introduced?
The New Economic Policy (NEP) was introduced in 1921 as a response to the failures of War Communism.
It represented a retreat from full state control towards a mixed economy.
The NEP aimed to revive agriculture, industry, and trade while maintaining political control.
Lenin saw it as a temporary measure: “One step backwards, two steps forward.”
What changes did the NEP bring to agriculture?
Grain requisitioning was abolished and replaced by a system of taxation.
Peasants were allowed to sell surplus food on the open market for profit.
There was no forced collectivisation; the mir (village commune) remained the basis of rural organisation.
These concessions aimed to boost food production and win peasant support.
What were the key changes in industry under the NEP?
Small-scale industry was returned to private ownership.
The state retained control of the “commanding heights” — heavy industry, transport, and banking.
State factories used piecework and bonuses to raise productivity, a tactic borrowed from capitalist practices.
A currency was reintroduced in 1921 to pay wages, replacing the barter system of War Communism.
How did the NEP affect trade and the market economy?
Private trading was legalised to end the reliance on the black market.
Many local authorities had already turned a blind eye to illegal trading before this formal policy change.
The reappearance of markets encouraged the growth of small businesses and petty traders.
Who were the Nepmen, and why were they controversial?
The Nepmen were private traders and small-scale entrepreneurs who profited under the NEP.
They symbolised the return of capitalist values and inequality.
Many Bolsheviks on the party’s left wing viewed them with hostility and saw them as enemies of socialism.
Their presence reflected the compromises of the NEP and the abandonment of strict ideological goals.
Why was the NEP seen as a betrayal by some Bolsheviks?
It allowed private trade, private ownership, and capitalist incentives like bonuses and wages.
The return to a money-based economy and the success of Nepmen felt like ideological backsliding.
Left-wing Bolsheviks tolerated the NEP only as a temporary retreat needed for survival.
Lenin defended it as a necessary step to stabilise the economy before a future move towards socialism.
Did the NEP lead to political liberalisation?
No — while there was economic compromise, there was no political relaxation.
The NEP was introduced alongside a crackdown on opposition parties.
Mensheviks were arrested and all other political parties were outlawed.
The Bolsheviks maintained a one-party state, despite the shift in economic policy